Originally Posted by Jess321204:
“Well,tell me why he won 'best newcomer' if he is such a crap actor?
i'm afraid a lot of people would beg to differ with you.Your so called opinion didn't sound like an opinion to me.You just sounded like somebody who gets a kick out of slagging people off.I am NOT slagging YOU off for your opinion - but this thread has turned into 'lets see who can insult Nigel the most'”
Well, calling people sad losers for their opinion is hardly going to win you much support is it? I don't get a kick out of 'slagging people off', this whole thread was started as a light hearted response to all the Nigel Harman 'mania' that's been going on and which I think is undeserved due to his bad acting. Some have agreed with me, some have disagreed. Everybody is entitled to their opinion. However, people that just write on these forums calling everyone sad losers and pea brained without actually giving valid arguments are frankly a waste of forum space. I'm all for people expressing an opinion but not just arbitrarily disagreeing because it differs from their opinion.
Yes, he won best newcomer at various soap magazine awards; that doesn't make him a good actor to me. These things are usually based on magazines like Heat's bigging up of said celebrities and whilst I read and enjoy Heat magazine, I certainly don't think that what they say is gospel. A good actor is someone believeable, who makes me empathise with their character. Nigel Harman does not do this for me I'm afraid, but there are plenty of actors who do. I am entitled to express an opinion without being told I am slagging people off. I personally prefer Coronation Street - you obviously prefer EastEnders. Therefore, you are a sad pea brained loser. See, totally unreasonable isn't it?