Originally Posted by The_Cuckoo:
“Why am I the only person in the whole world, that thinks Dr. WHO is terrible?
I'm a huge sci-fi fan, and I think the idea of Dr. WHO is brilliant. I stopped watching ages ago because I thought it was so crummy, but decided to give the last two episodes a go, and I thought it was one of the worst things I'd ever seen!
I honestly can't see why so many people enjoy it so much. I think the plots are unoriginal and unimaginative and clearly written by someone who clearly has very little grasp of science fiction, the editing is abysmal - everything seems to get dragged out endlessly, the dialogue is equally uninspiring, the sets looks rubbish, and the acting is far from anything impressive.
When I see so many great sci-fi series out there, I find Dr. WHO embarrassing at best by comparison. What makes so many people watch?”
I'm going to respond your post as diplomatically and sincerely as possible because, according to your successive responses, you have yet to receive a satisfactory response to your initial post.
Obviously your "am I the only one..." comment isn't meant literally so I shan't reply to it accept to say it's down to personal opinions and taste - personally, I love a range of programmes: Doctor Who, anything by Charlie Brooker, 30 Rock, Lost, Life On Mars to name a few. Maybe not particularly highbrow but I'm sure you'd agree a fairly broad range of stuff.
The whole concept of Doctor Who is indeed fantastic - a hero with numerous lifelines, a universe of enemies and civilizations etc. At what point did you start watching? And when did you stop? The last two episodes certainly weren't the finest since 2005 but, for many, I think they were spectacular enough yet poetic to please hardcore fans and occasional viewers alike. Similarly, I wouldn't say it was Russell T Davies' finest writing either, but I think to say it's one of the worst things you've ever seen is a huge disservice to something that has been created with love, admiration and respect for it's 40-odd year history.
Might I ask why you say it is unoriginal? I don't watch too much sci-fi so the occasional accusations of "Buffy rip off" etc pass me by. I agree that the end of part one of End of Time lasted waaaay too long, and there have been a few times where poor editing decision have been made, but I think that the nearly 60 episodes of Doctor Who since 2005 have been a triumph - Blink, Girl in the Fireplace, The Stolen Earth, Turn Left, Midnight are just a few memorable episodes that I think rank as some of the best hours of TV.
On the accusation of unimpressive acting, I'd like you to name some examples of "impressive acting"? I don't tend to get too emotive whilst watching TV, but there have been a couple of times while watching Doctor Who that David Tennant's performances have made me shed a tear, left me heartbroken and filled me with joy - surely the mark of a great actor?
I think that when you say it's written by someone with no grasp of Sci Fi kinda misses the point. Any drama, any GOOD drama (be it period, soap or sci fi) is, essentially, about relationships - between a police officer and the killer he is hunting; the woman searching for her missing child; the family sharing their home with an alien. A good writer, a good drama, should transcend genre and allow the viewer to relate in some way to what they are witnessing. I may not entirely understand what a paradox machine is, or what Deus ex Machina means, but I DO understand how it feels to be torn away from someone you love, how you sometimes have to make a heartbreaking decision, or how good it feels to sometimes just escape. A good writer should connect with an audience regardless of genre.
I can't pretend to tell you why so many people watch Doctor Who, but I hope that my post explains in some way why
I watch it and that, because I've given your original post some respect, you will do me the same.