There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !
is david seaman still with frankie?
2 of 3
Originally Posted by vincent's mojo:
“SORRY is this true about david seaman and frankie?”
“SORRY is this true about david seaman and frankie?”
this is news to me aswell
Originally Posted by Leicester_Hunk:
“Actually people put themselves in the public eye and these forums exist to discuss such things so it is relevant to discuss it, whether it is "our business" or not!!!”
“Actually people put themselves in the public eye and these forums exist to discuss such things so it is relevant to discuss it, whether it is "our business" or not!!!”
Originally Posted by conchie:
“The moment you choose a profession or lifestyle that brings with it the title of celebrity in any form, you have to accept you leave your privacy to a huge extent behind you. If your privacy is of massive importance to you as a person, you simply don't put yourself in the pubic eye, full stop.
The story about Frankie and David was widely reported on in the papers at the time, and its a perfectly reasonable enquiry for someone to make as to whether or not they are still together.”
“The moment you choose a profession or lifestyle that brings with it the title of celebrity in any form, you have to accept you leave your privacy to a huge extent behind you. If your privacy is of massive importance to you as a person, you simply don't put yourself in the pubic eye, full stop.
The story about Frankie and David was widely reported on in the papers at the time, and its a perfectly reasonable enquiry for someone to make as to whether or not they are still together.”
Sorry but having a talent for a profession that by its very nature puts you in the public does not make you, your family, friends or private life fair game for the public. That's absolute nonsense. How realistic is it for someone to say "I'd like to be a sportsperson/singer/actor (etc) but I don't want anyone to know who I am" ? Rubbish.
Someone's talent or attributes and the profession that it makes them suitable for, or that they desire to pursue, should not make them subject to press and public intrusion. They are human beings. Buying someone's records or a ticket to one of their shows, films, games does not buy you a right to their life.
Originally Posted by conchie:
“There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !”
“There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !”
The reasons I didn't feel at all sorry for Debbie (his wife) when I heard about him and Frankie are that I've met her and she's rather hard nosed and unpleasant and, more to the point, he was married when she met him (when she was the receptionist at Arsenal) and she knew this but had no reservations about throwing herself at him.
What goes around comes around but perhaps Frankie was Debbie's karma.
Originally Posted by WakingUpInVegas:
“Really!!! I would have never of guessed she was 36, looks much younger”
“Really!!! I would have never of guessed she was 36, looks much younger”
Only because she is so tiny.
I'm another one who was blissfully ignorant of this relationship. Made me chuckle though - talk about Little & Large.
Originally Posted by conchie:
“The moment you choose a profession or lifestyle that brings with it the title of celebrity in any form, you have to accept you leave your privacy to a huge extent behind you. If your privacy is of massive importance to you as a person, you simply don't put yourself in the pubic eye, full stop.
The story about Frankie and David was widely reported on in the papers at the time, and its a perfectly reasonable enquiry for someone to make as to whether or not they are still together.”
“The moment you choose a profession or lifestyle that brings with it the title of celebrity in any form, you have to accept you leave your privacy to a huge extent behind you. If your privacy is of massive importance to you as a person, you simply don't put yourself in the pubic eye, full stop.
The story about Frankie and David was widely reported on in the papers at the time, and its a perfectly reasonable enquiry for someone to make as to whether or not they are still together.”
When David Seaman started out, footballers were not ever classed as celebrities. Even Frankie isnt really a celebrity.
Originally Posted by conchie:
“There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !”
“There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !”
And thats a major generalisation isnt it? And very much far from the truth.
For a forum where celebrity gossip is it's raison d'etre, there are some remarkably "holier than thou" comments on this thread?
Originally Posted by conchie:
“There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !”
“There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !”
she must know she's skating on thin ice if she thinks he'll be faithful to her....
I'd hate to be with a bloke that has all those 'access' visits to fit in.....
Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of David and Frankie's relationship, anyone in the public eye does have to accept that their dirty linen will be aired in public and that people who have nothing to do with them personally will discuss what they do in all walks of life. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with this; I do find myself interested to a certain point in some aspects of certain celebrities lives outside their chosen celebrity sphere but I'd hope to not pass judgement on them.
Whenever anyone becomes famous, people who watch them in whatever sphere has made them famous do tend to want to know more about them. It becomes a kind of celebrity circle in which, the more famous someone gets, the more interest is generated in them, the more the press tries to uncover about them, the more is known about them, the more famous they get and the more interest is generated in them...
Saying that the celebrity shouldn't have to endure this intrusive interest in their private life is only true to an extent. If a celebrity has become famous for having a real talent (sporting/creative etc) and does not try to exploit every photo opportunity but keeps their other half/family out of the media as far as possible then yes, fair enough, I think their privacy should be respected. Tom Daly, for example, should be able to train for 2012 without having paparazzi outside his house wondering if he's got himself a girlfriend yet. David Seaman is a bit less clear. Yes, he originally became famous because of a sporting talent and didn't necessarily sign up to the showbiz goldfish bowl. However, since his retirement from football, he's not exactly tried to stay out of the public eye. And the problem with that is that the sort of celebrity he's now become relies to a certain extent on gossip to maintain it.
Whenever anyone becomes famous, people who watch them in whatever sphere has made them famous do tend to want to know more about them. It becomes a kind of celebrity circle in which, the more famous someone gets, the more interest is generated in them, the more the press tries to uncover about them, the more is known about them, the more famous they get and the more interest is generated in them...
Saying that the celebrity shouldn't have to endure this intrusive interest in their private life is only true to an extent. If a celebrity has become famous for having a real talent (sporting/creative etc) and does not try to exploit every photo opportunity but keeps their other half/family out of the media as far as possible then yes, fair enough, I think their privacy should be respected. Tom Daly, for example, should be able to train for 2012 without having paparazzi outside his house wondering if he's got himself a girlfriend yet. David Seaman is a bit less clear. Yes, he originally became famous because of a sporting talent and didn't necessarily sign up to the showbiz goldfish bowl. However, since his retirement from football, he's not exactly tried to stay out of the public eye. And the problem with that is that the sort of celebrity he's now become relies to a certain extent on gossip to maintain it.
Well, I am extremely late to this one! Picked it up via DS mentioning Frankie on Twitter this morning - so had to Google it.
Anyway, they are still together two years down the line, so hopefully it may be a keeper.
Always sad when couples split up, but I guess that's life.
Anyway, they are still together two years down the line, so hopefully it may be a keeper.
Always sad when couples split up, but I guess that's life.
Originally Posted by conchie:
“There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !”
“There is a great saying Frankie might do well to listen to.......
If he cheats with you.........he will cheat on you !!!
Simples !”
Bit of advice for Karen and Chris there!!!!
Originally Posted by ms2608:
“Well, I am extremely late to this one! Picked it up via DS mentioning Frankie on Twitter this morning - so had to Google it.
Anyway, they are still together two years down the line, so hopefully it may be a keeper.
Always sad when couples split up, but I guess that's life.”
“Well, I am extremely late to this one! Picked it up via DS mentioning Frankie on Twitter this morning - so had to Google it.
Anyway, they are still together two years down the line, so hopefully it may be a keeper.
Always sad when couples split up, but I guess that's life.”
'a keeper?' Nice one!
Something must have gone horribly wrong. I read an article once about how when he was proposing to Debbie he lit the whole garden with candles. Rather liked him then. And why does he keep having kids if he's going to walk out on them?
Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“Something must have gone horribly wrong. I read an article once about how when he was proposing to Debbie he lit the whole garden with candles. Rather liked him then. And why does he keep having kids if he's going to walk out on them?”
“Something must have gone horribly wrong. I read an article once about how when he was proposing to Debbie he lit the whole garden with candles. Rather liked him then. And why does he keep having kids if he's going to walk out on them?”
He's not the only on DOI that has left their children for some teenage crush, they need to grow up and stop being so selfish.
Originally Posted by ms2608:
“Anyway, they are still together two years down the line, so hopefully it may be a keeper. ”
“Anyway, they are still together two years down the line, so hopefully it may be a keeper. ”
He's a retired keeper
Originally Posted by ms2608:
“Well, I am extremely late to this one! Picked it up via DS mentioning Frankie on Twitter this morning - so had to Google it.
Anyway, they are still together two years down the line, so hopefully it may be a keeper.
Always sad when couples split up, but I guess that's life.”
“Well, I am extremely late to this one! Picked it up via DS mentioning Frankie on Twitter this morning - so had to Google it.
Anyway, they are still together two years down the line, so hopefully it may be a keeper.
Always sad when couples split up, but I guess that's life.”
I think Frankie will need a lot longer than two years before she starts to feel secure - provided of course she doesn't have children. It seems David isn't too keen once his children reach the ages between 7 and 9. He walked out on his first marriage when his children were 7 and 8 and the youngsters from his second marriage when they were 8 and nine.
Not exactly a great track record.
Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“Something must have gone horribly wrong. I read an article once about how when he was proposing to Debbie he lit the whole garden with candles. Rather liked him then. And why does he keep having kids if he's going to walk out on them?”
“Something must have gone horribly wrong. I read an article once about how when he was proposing to Debbie he lit the whole garden with candles. Rather liked him then. And why does he keep having kids if he's going to walk out on them?”
Because he doesn't plan to walk out on them I would think.
Originally Posted by Snow_Leopard:
“Because he doesn't plan to walk out on them I would think.”
“Because he doesn't plan to walk out on them I would think.”
Planned or not , it is completely and utterly selfish to leave children, they should come first .
Originally Posted by kitten12:
“For a forum where celebrity gossip is it's raison d'etre, there are some remarkably "holier than thou" comments on this thread?”
“For a forum where celebrity gossip is it's raison d'etre, there are some remarkably "holier than thou" comments on this thread?”
It is ever the case. It does make me laugh though.
Originally Posted by Snow_Leopard:
“Because he doesn't plan to walk out on them I would think.”
“Because he doesn't plan to walk out on them I would think.”
Well perhaps he should engage his brain before he engages any other part of his anatomy
Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“Well perhaps he should engage his brain before he engages any other part of his anatomy”
“Well perhaps he should engage his brain before he engages any other part of his anatomy”
Seaman by name ...
Originally Posted by Mynametoday:
“Planned or not , it is completely and utterly selfish to leave children, they should come first .”
“Planned or not , it is completely and utterly selfish to leave children, they should come first .”
I think there are circumstances when it isn't. Some of the stories in the news prove that children can be better off without bad parents.
2 of 3
