DS Forums

 
 

The Mitchell and Friends show...


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13-01-2010, 13:26
BaileyBigIdiot
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,328

I dont think that Eastenders needs another Mitchell. In the show right now we have Phil, Peggy, Ben, Billy, Ronnie, Roxy, Glenda and Danny entering the show and Archie as just gone.

I think with another Mitchell it will be more screen time for them, i think they might as well call it the Mitchell and friends show.

I like the Mitchells but i like them when there isnt to many of them such as just having Phil, Ronnie and Roxy have the main storylines in the Mitchell family I would axe Billy as he is just given the same storyline over and over again and Peggy is leaving. we dont need all these other Mitchells. all of this is imo of course

So do you think that the Mitchells screen time be cut down and let them have abit of a rest or do you think give them more?
BaileyBigIdiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 13-01-2010, 13:43
layne
 
Posts: n/a
I don't think they need more mitchells.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 13:46
2shy2007
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40,800
We need only 3 Mitchells,Ben,Philand Billy, dump the rest of them they are awful,miserable sour faced things they are

Trimthe blonde ones, Corrie trimmed the Connors, EE can do the same witrh the most annoying family in soaplabd
2shy2007 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 13:49
Pop_Art
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Finally back in the UK!
Posts: 4,640
People are so poor in their research.

Maybe you should go and count just how MASSIVE the Branning/Jackson's will be once Carol and Billy roll back up. They are the biggest family on the show and every scene from February is likely to contain at least one of them.
Pop_Art is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 13:54
Maidenfan666
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St Andrews, Scotland
Posts: 6,334
Im not bothered as long as the new dude is a good character.
Maidenfan666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 14:04
trunkster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,968
Why not call it 'The Mitchells'? As I seem to remember EE very nearly became 'The Slaters' a few years back.
trunkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 14:06
samj_namesake
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,059
Why not call it 'The Mitchells'? As I seem to remember EE very nearly became 'The Slaters' a few years back.
Question: why does every post you make involve the

just curious
samj_namesake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 14:08
trunkster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,968
Question: why does every post you make involve the

just curious
Are you stalking me?
trunkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 14:13
samj_namesake
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,059
Are you stalking me?
you wish

Nope just happened to notice you post in a few threads I've been posting in today and saw you continuously use the face
samj_namesake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 14:15
trunkster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,968
you wish

Nope just happened to notice you post in a few threads I've been posting in today and saw you continuously use the face
How very observant of you
trunkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 14:25
BaileyBigIdiot
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,328
People are so poor in their research.

Maybe you should go and count just how MASSIVE the Branning/Jackson's will be once Carol and Billy roll back up. They are the biggest family on the show and every scene from February is likely to contain at least one of them.
I know there is going to be alot of Branning and Jacksons on screen at once but at the moment and for the past two years the Mitchells are never of screen at least twice in a week never less you will have one Mitchell storyline, i just think its to much and the current Jacksons are a young family so they normally only have Bianca, Whitney and Ricky getting the main storylines and Ricky's storylines normally revolve around Bianca.
BaileyBigIdiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 14:34
alias alias
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Firefox♂
Posts: 8,304
Question: why does every post you make involve the

just curious
The wind changed
alias alias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 14:56
Maidenfan666
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St Andrews, Scotland
Posts: 6,334
Question: why does every post you make involve the

just curious
Ive no idea why that person is personally using it, but typically it is a sign of ignorance, a sign of someone trying to be condescending or rude.
Maidenfan666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 15:03
trunkster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,968
Ive no idea why that person is personally using it, but typically it is a sign of ignorance, a sign of someone trying to be condescending or rude.

So what's your problem?
trunkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 15:07
BaileyBigIdiot
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,328
So this thread has turned into one asking why does a certain person use alot. it really is edge of the seat stuff
BaileyBigIdiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 15:09
Sammix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 686
Well, according to this http://tv.sky.com/eastenders-spoiler...as-new-admirer it looks like the new Mitchell is going to have a pretty good storyline straight away so I don't object. Like someone else said, as long as they keep giving them good storylines...
Sammix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 15:15
samj_namesake
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,059
So this thread has turned into one asking why does a certain person use alot. it really is edge of the seat stuff
lmao and I started it, I feel so proud
samj_namesake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 22:11
umr3000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,900
Love em' or hate em' The Mitchells have played a big part in regards to how the show has shaped up in the last 20 years or so, including some real strong storylines, and characters. They have truly been the heart of the show.

In my opinion i do not think one family should dominate the show copmpletely, it should be shared out and balanced.
I think with Archie dead, Peggy leaving soon, maybe Billy should follow suit, i honestly think the character has run out of steam and should be axed. I would like Danny and Glenda to remain in the show on a permanent basis alongside Ronnie, Roxy and Phil. Ben is okay, but should only be used as a semi regular, he is bareable in small doses.
umr3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 22:36
Brunosgal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,980
Well, according to this http://tv.sky.com/eastenders-spoiler...as-new-admirer it looks like the new Mitchell is going to have a pretty good storyline straight away so I don't object. Like someone else said, as long as they keep giving them good storylines...
the mitchells have to go in2 another storyline like they dont have enough storylines of there own
Brunosgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 23:27
hattersfan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 745
Love em' or hate em' The Mitchells have played a big part in regards to how the show has shaped up in the last 20 years or so, including some real strong storylines, and characters. They have truly been the heart of the show.

In my opinion i do not think one family should dominate the show copmpletely, it should be shared out and balanced.
I think with Archie dead, Peggy leaving soon, maybe Billy should follow suit, i honestly think the character has run out of steam and should be axed. I would like Danny and Glenda to remain in the show on a permanent basis alongside Ronnie, Roxy and Phil. Ben is okay, but should only be used as a semi regular, he is bareable in small doses.
Wherever Piggy goes then mummy's boy Philth won't be far behind so hopefully we'll soon see the last of the potato headed toper. His son 'weak sperm' will have to go with him too so happy days could soon be hear again.
hattersfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2010, 23:37
blue_cobalt
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,408
Am glad Piggy is finally leaving. Philth, Bent and Bully should all go to, but I would keep Glenda, Danny, Ronnie and Roxy. They have much more potential that the "old" Mitchells
blue_cobalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2010, 07:45
kreed82
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,086
Am glad Piggy is finally leaving. Philth, Bent and Bully should all go to, but I would keep Glenda, Danny, Ronnie and Roxy. They have much more potential that the "old" Mitchells
Glenda and ronnie dont sound like mitchells..If you fade out the billys,phil and peggys u will just have roxy lumbered between 2 posh birds
Im not bothered as long as the new dude is a good character.
but ryan already fills the youngish soap hunk qouta.What the hell is the point of this guy
kreed82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-2010, 05:17
EE_springer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 222
While I agree, and have said before, that EE is becoming a bit more like "The Mitchells", I'm not sure calling it "The Mitchells and Friends Show" would work. That implies that the Mitchells actually have friends.
EE_springer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:04.