Originally Posted by icedragon:
“My slight exaggeration was not absurd”
It was absurd -- and was not slight --
compared to what I said.
Quote:
“ - I'm not accusing you - I said how it appeared to me.”
"You're being disingenuous here" is accusing me. The part behind "appear" was accusing me too. You've continued such accusations in this post.
Quote:
“ And I explained my point quite clearly - nothing secret about it.”
So what is the
unexaggerated version of "If they spent the whole two months doing nothing but skating about", and where did you post it?
Quote:
“I didn't say a backflip on ice either but you appeared to take it that I did by referring to one in the context of the show.”
I referred to in the the context of
your comparison.
Quote:
“You can't possibly know unless you are at the training rinks for the same amount of time they are, whether they spend all their time on lifts or not. I would think not as indeed Daniella showed this week.”
I didn't say they spent all their time on lifts. But spending a lot of time on lifts would fit with their skating difficulties and also with the content of the routines that have little (or no) skating and spend most of the time on lifts.
Daniella's routine had a lot of skating in it, and we could see she spent a lot of time on the skating. Is there anything that shows Emily, for example, has been spending so large a proportion of her time on skating?
Even if the only way to get Emily and other weak skaters to do more skating practice was to put more skating in their routines, then
that could be done.
I just don't like seeing contestants' chances suffer because they seem to be doing "no" skating or to "just" being carried or held up by their partner. Surely it must be possible to make some change there, and I don't understand why anyone would resist the idea so strongly.
Quote:
“You may think 6 weeks is plenty of time to learn to skate - I, from experience of learning to skate as an adult say it is not a long time and I've explained all that above but it apparently doesn't fit your theory or chosen viewpoint.”
Most of the celebs manage to get far enough in the 6 weeks.
Quote:
“The first skate UK course covers little more than gliding forwards (not even yet stroking) and and learning how to get up from a fall and that is given over a period of about 6 weeks. Yes obviously their training is more intensive but it allows little time for practice which is where the confidence begins to grow.”
How do you know it allows little time for practice? Have you seen their training, for example? Any solid evidence here would be helpful, and appreciated.
Quote:
“if you were an adult who had learned to skate as an adult as the DOI contestants (mostly) are, then I'd think your viewpoint on how long it should take them had more validity.”
You aren't going only by your own experience but also by what you've seen other do. I have also seen adults learn to skate as adults. But I say again: I don't like seeing contestants' chances suffer because they seem to be doing "no" skating or to "just" being carried or held up by their partner; and surely it must be possible to make some change there, so that the weaker skaters are a bit less weak and frightened.
You seem to think it isn't possible.