DS Forums

 
 

It would have been better if...


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15-01-2010, 20:35
kathplatform
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bridge over troubled waters
Posts: 675

Archie had put in his will that he wanted the names of everyone in albert square in a hat (in other words the cast plus a few extras) and whatever name was pulled out thats who got the vic.

Would have been great if Shirley got it.

If this happened who would you like behind the vic?

I would have loved if Janene had got the vic. "Celebration drinks on me?" LOL.
kathplatform is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 15-01-2010, 20:37
BaileyBigIdiot
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,328
I would still end up being a Mitchell, thats the way Diederick Santer wants it.
BaileyBigIdiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-2010, 20:40
Stupid_Head
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 36,061
Hopefully once Santer leaves, Kirkwood is "brave" enough to move the Mitchells out of the pub. It's very dull now.
Stupid_Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-2010, 21:30
BaileyBigIdiot
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,328
Hopefully once Santer leaves, Kirkwood is "brave" enough to move the Mitchells out of the pub. It's very dull now.
I think its because is predictable anyone that crosses one Mitchell crosses them all, never mess with a Mitchell, "Its all about the family!", "Get out of my pub!". You always know anything good that happens to Ronnie turns to misery, Roxy always ends up sleeping with someone, Phil is never as good as Grant in Peggys eyes, Ben moaning about his life, Peggy hates anyone that doesnt do what she wants them to do and Billy always getting the worst in life i mean a stool for god sake could they not have given him Archies house.
BaileyBigIdiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-2010, 21:53
Bertypop
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridge Street
Posts: 3,085
...and Billy always getting the worst in life i mean a stool for god sake could they not have given him Archies house.
In one way, I liked Archie giving Billy the stool - it made a point to the rest of the Mitchells about how they treat their family. Also, Archie never really liked Billy, he just used him, hence why he didn't get anything material.

What I didn't like about it was that it sort of gave the game away that a Mitchell was going to get the pub.

It said something along the lines of "...so that he can never again be cast out from the bosom of his family." The Mitchell's couldn't cast him out if they didn't own the pub.
Bertypop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-2010, 21:55
BaileyBigIdiot
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,328
In one way, I liked Archie giving Billy the stool - it made a point to the rest of the Mitchells about how they treat their family. Also, Archie never really liked Billy, he just used him, hence why he didn't get anything material.

What I didn't like about it was that it sort of gave the game away that a Mitchell was going to get the pub.

It said something along the lines of "...so that he can never again be cast out from the bosom of his family." The Mitchell's couldn't cast him out if they didn't own the pub.
But i think it would have been a brilliant twist if it turned out that Billy got it, peggys face would be a picture, i was so glad she never got it she was expecting to get it aswell over confident cow.
BaileyBigIdiot is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:07.