Then if that's the case, why am I being caused to have repeat it all again

I would ask what Kate has in the pipeline, knowing you are a Kate fan. But to be honest I couldn't really care less what Kate has or hasn't in the pipeline


I don't know, Kate's Devils don't do too bad a job on the speculating front

Err, I think the word you are looking for is 'artful'

I see -well it is not good is it?
Is he advertising gloves or something? is that the idea? (he looks a bit threatening to me)
I do not remember Alex's bottom being that hairy in BB3-what happenned to back,crack and sac-which seems to be breaking news as I type.

But if the photo was here all the time -what was the arguement about-Alex's fans could have produced it at any time.It was not in the calender-so what? Why is it a big issue?

Perhaps the odd thing is this is not one of the pictures I remember from pre BB3 portfolio.This is the real oddity.
Perhaps we can take this opportunity to get to the bottom of this once and for all-before we all get distracted by BB5 and have jobs to do.


Presumably Alex's fans will know if they are on his website somewhere-or maybe he himself can shed light on them-it is not something you are goimg to forget is it?-after all it seems to have become a vital issue on this forum for some unknown reason.

(I would have preferred any talk on bottoms to have been about Katie's bottom-this is after all a thread on Kate-seems Alex fans cannot be polite)

Thats a good point....so....ermm......Kates bottom - we saw it when she stipped off nude to get in the pool right?

One of the Sunday tabloids has 'Our' Katie on the front page today, viewed from the rear, wearing only knickers

Plus a story inside, page 5, about her and Woody with the bubble gum picture already discussed here


I think it was The Star, but their website is so crappy I can't find even find a picture of their own front page

oops - sorry Star readers, i was looking on the wrong website........


here it is

iirc ... wasnt the bum shot of alex for a campaign about guys wearing condoms to fight against aids and his cosmo pics were for the fight against testicular cancer .... i maybe wrong but i thought it was

for me theres a big difference to doing these kind of shoots for those reasons than getting your kit off to try and get a job and more publicity ....lets face it thats blatantly the reason kates does this .....anyone who doesnt mind their boyfriend videoing them when having nookie then wouldnt bat an eye at pushing themselves into the limelight like this

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home Porn ?
Whats all that about ?
I must have missed it .
Details please ?

just been reading this thread is great as a comic strip sprayed my computer when I read that bit of Avalon about how fans of other bb housemates must be upset cos they dont get the coverage of kate she had some piccies and few lines in a gossip column alison for one was on tv last night like or loathe her had 5 big pieces in magazines this week has just finished celeb fit club and now on the way to hollywood to do some interviews - and you think kates the most successful - gawd funny really funny

If you had seen the first two weeks of BB3 or followed Kate and Alison at all closely since you would know that Kate is Alison's Biggest Fan and er vice versa.
These odd people on here who do not like Kate think it is a clever way of getting at her to attack her friend in a rude way.

i agree with you Alison is the true winner of Big Brother-all 4 of them put together!

OF it was in the papers just as she went into the house it was the loaded ex boyfriend that she talked about in the house she was worried he might sell the videos to the papers but he promised her he wouldnt

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ !!
Didn`t know Alison was really a group of Quads .

Its the poor mother giving birth that I feel sorry for .

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blimey !
I bet the Kate Fans were very indignant about that.
They call an exposed bottom " Soft Porn " ,
so I bet ,
KATE ,admitting to " FULL SEX ON CAMERA " ,
Really upset them , didn`t it ?

( Don`t know how I missed it .)

Bet your glad you did tho

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems like with fuss about the,
" Kate/ Radio job ", and the" Alex / pretty blonde "
both being untrue ,
nobody answered the above.

Never mind ,
I dare say , sooner or later
we`ll see :
KATE`S HOME PORN MOVIES.
being sold in the back pages of Sunday Sport , etc.
Wonder how that will please her Fans ,
" who always look forward to seeing more of her . "

Last edited by OLD FOGEY : 27-04-2004 at 19:25

Both stories are true as far as I know.
FM's just built more into them than was the case-at least as far as the Kate story is concerned.

You seem very obsessed with Kate even though you say you do not like her or indeed hers-I can almost hear you drooling.

The tape story is old news -did you not see it at the time-did it pass you by?
You won't see them-they were for private consumption and will remain so I am sure.(they are inflammable material)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wasn`t that what Pamela Anderson said ?

Alex is an "arse"...obviously

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah , the true character of another Kate Fan ,
rises to the surface.
Someone touch a nerve ?


P.S.
Are Moderators as rare as Unicorns ?

I think you remember incorrectly.

According to the tabs that republished it as part of their usual digging frenzy of housemates' pasts...

the bum pic (among others) was from a More magazine shoot for the 1998 world cup. I think he was suppose to be some sort of David Seaman...hence the gear and goalie gloves. The frontal pics was posing with a union flag thong.

More magazine is aimed at the J17 teenage girl market... therefore most likely it was intended for young girlies' titillation rather than any noble cause.

To be fair I suppose some people such as Avolon can reasonably describe that as "porn" --- def. [re pics] "images of person(s) in varying states of nudity, the primary purpose of which is to cause sexual arousal in the viewer".

so there we have it ....

kate does porn

But, by the sounds of it porn has to include nudity?

Kate has never shown any of her bits has she? She always keeps them covered.

(Apart from those "unoffical" topless ones a while back)