Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“I don't think Sharron can ever be accused of lacking backbone - as you would know had you ever emulated the achievements she reached in her field of expertise.
An international athlete doesn't deliver medals at all levels of competition by being spineless. The only faeces I saw last night was sitting slap, bang in the middle of the judges panel.”
Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“I disagree with you so my post is ridiculous and I'm silly; another poster on another thread disagreed with you and you considered their post silly.
Is a post only intelligent if the point of view coincides with your own?
As for being offensive - where is the insult in my comments? Sharron Davies is one of the most successful swimmers this country has ever produced - and could not have achieved her goals by whinging and lacking guts. Like all international athletes she trained long and hard from a very young age to achieve success. She's had to face disappointment and come back fighting, - and I reiterate my opinion that had you achieved similar success you would withdraw your allegation that she lacks backbone.
Now where is the insult in that?
As for my comment on Jason, would it have been more acceptable had I responded to the 'faeces' remark with the riposte 'It takes one to know one!' It seems to me trading insults is the only language he understands.
We should send him a copy of Charles Kingsley's Water Babies, with particular reference to Mrs. BeDoneByAsYouDid - though I doubt if he would understand the principle of 'you reap as you sow.'”
1. I did not say your post was ridiculous because I disagreed with your opinion, I said it was ridiculous because you were trying to be offensive to me (your "as you would know etc remark) while complaining about someone being offensive.
2. I made no remark about about SD having a backbone during her swimming career - I was very obviously talking about her trying to develop one for DoI. She has had a couple of comments directed at her she didn't like - so what! She seems to go into melt down at the drop of a hat. JG's comments are often stupid (although he often gets it right as well) - but that is all they are, why the hell is she behaving as if she morally assaulted - frankly she should be delighted he was "mean" to her, otherwise she may already have gone.
3. And to complain about someone using a faeces remark - then use an equally asinine one in your own post is, well, silly.