Originally Posted by shortiefluff:
“Emma wasn't asked for her opinion but as her mark was 2.0 lower she clearly deduted 2 pts from her previous week, and while some of it was due to a weaker performance, under the rules she deducted 0.5 for his stumble and 1.5 for the performance, which i have no problem with, but Hayley's fall was a far worse mistake and therefore should have been punished as such, if a wobbles a 0.5, a fall is more, regardless of the fact that it was 1 mistake. Yes i know im backtracking on my desire for a 0.5 punishment for each mistake but a fall does not equate to a wobble. Hayley was marked down for her mistake, Mikey was moreso, that is the only basis of my musings.
And as I have said in numerous posts, I like many of the contenders in the field, Hayley is 1 of those but she has to be marked accordingly and by the same rules as the others in the comp. Mikey was undermarked, Hayley should have been compared to him, yes she was better than him, but her mistake means by not as big a margin as the end result indicated and Daniella was virtually flawless yet was below her despite being her equal on the night.
This is a subjective competition for the viewer, but Hayley was not the best on the night and shouldn't have been given the best mark, and Mikey's mark so low. I did not write about Hayley to turn it into a Hayley vs. Mikey thing, just to illustrarte the voting disparity of last week. Nor did I focus exclusively just on her, and I dislike the fact that my posts are being disected and other aspects ignored to make another point that isn't relevant to my original 1, that certain contestants were overmarked, otherse'under.
And as its a subjective programme, Im entitled to my opinion and to express my thoughts, which is that Hayley is this years teachers pet. My belief for this is based on her very high score for a routine which wasn't better than the previous week and a fall, whereas her nearest competitor was clearly penalised beyond the wobble and bad performance. The judges need a bit more parity with the vote.
I love a good debate, but its not a debate when some tell me my opinions wrong rather than disagree.
It is now a little over 48hrs to the next dances, so surely this subject is now moot?”
Well that's one way to have the last word.
All the points I made were relevant to your posts - as can be confirmed by the fact the I responded directly to remarks as quoted; and of course I referred to the overmarking and undermarking - but I don't mind repeating myself.
imo Hayley was
not overmarked - Mikey
was slight undermarked.
btw I see you formed the same opinion last night - i.e. Hayley overmarked. Well I think I will steer clear of your posts from now on - what is the point of offering an opinion to a self styled
'Anyone but Hayley?'
Unfortunately I was away for the weekend so had no opportunity to respond.
Please indicate where I told you your opinions are wrong - then we can let the matter rest.