DS Forums

 
 

The Ratings Thread (Part 7)


Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-03-2010, 20:58
gottago
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 13,404
Is this basically an X Factor style competition for comedians - how does it rate? Surprised ITV haven't brought it over especially as they're looking for more entertainment shows for Fridays, though on second thoughts with it being a second revival I'm guessing it doesn't pull in many viewers.
I'm sure Last Comic Standing has been done by a British broadcaster before but I can't think where or when. I do remember there was a late night programme on ITV1 called Take the Mic which may have been similar.
gottago is offline Follow this poster on Twitter  
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 05-03-2010, 20:59
jake lyle
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,924
Odd that it took ITV over a year to recreate a programme which had already been shown on BBC.

Book some celebs, install ice rink, hire some judges - including Nicky Slater (he was on BBC version 1st, maybe he had inside info for ITV producers)

I wonder how ITV managed to pull it off

ITV used some of the same pros from strictly Ice dancing, David Seaman won Strictly ICE dancing and 14 months later was a contestant on Dancing on ice.Jason Gardener was even a judge on Strictly dance fever

Actually, Strictly Ice Dancing was commissioned before Dancing on Ice/Stars on Thin Ice:


Sources here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2004...v.broadcasting
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4042753.stm
http://strictlydancing.utopian-total...ing-shows.html

Planning of both shows probably started at a similar time, so I'm not saying ITV1 copied Strictly Ice Dancing but BBC1 did get in there first with the official announcement and commissioning of their show.
No doubt about it though, that Dancing on Ice wouldn't have been commissioned had it not been for the success of Strictly Come Dancing.
Yes, this is what I thought to. My memory isnt so bad after all
jake lyle is online now  
Old 05-03-2010, 21:33
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
Actually, Strictly Ice Dancing was commissioned before Dancing on Ice/Stars on Thin Ice:


Sources here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2004...v.broadcasting
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4042753.stm
http://strictlydancing.utopian-total...ing-shows.html

Planning of both shows probably started at a similar time, so I'm not saying ITV1 copied Strictly Ice Dancing but BBC1 did get in there first with the official announcement and commissioning of their show. No doubt about it though, that Dancing on Ice wouldn't have been commissioned had it not been for the success of Strictly Come Dancing.
You learn something new everyday. That trusts me to believe Wiki when I doubled checked which was comissioned first.

Anyway, I don't think it matters in this case. The fact is that ABC are comissioning an ITV made show and the BBC have come in and will make the money from it.
Fudd is online now  
Old 05-03-2010, 21:58
Score
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,130
Is this basically an X Factor style competition for comedians - how does it rate? Surprised ITV haven't brought it over especially as they're looking for more entertainment shows for Fridays, though on second thoughts with it being a second revival I'm guessing it doesn't pull in many viewers.
The 2007 run on Wednesdays averaged 6.4m and a 2.7 in the demo, which for a Summer series is perfectly decent. In 2008 though it was moved to Thursdays and it dropped to 4.9m and 2.0, and was therefore axed. A year off may benefit it, but it may just harm it further. It could do ok for ITV, as stand up comedy is popular at the moment, and it would skew young for them, but the format would need to be perfected.
Score is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 22:33
Arthur Cucumber
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 480
You learn something new everyday. That trusts me to believe Wiki when I doubled checked which was comissioned first.

Anyway, I don't think it matters in this case. The fact is that ABC are comissioning an ITV made show and the BBC have come in and will make the money from it.
How so? The only thing that makes Dancing on Ice distinctive from Strictly Ice Dancing is the presence of Torville and Dean, and I assume they're not heading to ABC any time soon... The BBC will make money from a format they first aired six years ago. No big deal. Shame on ITV for not getting in there first, whether that be down to incompetence, offering a less attractive proposition or having an inferior reputation abroad.
Arthur Cucumber is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 22:35
Agent F
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 37,641
What about a second series of Collision with an entirely different cast? Like BBC1 did with Criminal Justice and Five days.
The concept's a bit too narrow I think - at least with Criminal Justice and Five Days you can adapt many stories to suit the format. Collision would always have to involve a, well, collision.
Agent F is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 22:38
rzt
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,788
The 2007 run on Wednesdays averaged 6.4m and a 2.7 in the demo, which for a Summer series is perfectly decent. In 2008 though it was moved to Thursdays and it dropped to 4.9m and 2.0, and was therefore axed. A year off may benefit it, but it may just harm it further. It could do ok for ITV, as stand up comedy is popular at the moment, and it would skew young for them, but the format would need to be perfected.
Just read that Fearne Cotton hosted the 2008 series, so I'm not surprised ratings dropped !

Cheers for the numbers - the 2007 figures seem okay and I think the show is something worth looking into for ITV as I bet it'd rate relatively well among the key demos (it couldn't get any worse than Michael Winner!).
rzt is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 22:52
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
How so? The only thing that makes Dancing on Ice distinctive from Strictly Ice Dancing is the presence of Torville and Dean, and I assume they're not heading to ABC any time soon... The BBC will make money from a format they first aired six years ago. No big deal. Shame on ITV for not getting in there first, whether that be down to incompetence, offering a less attractive proposition or having an inferior reputation abroad.
This is the point that bugs me. The first two points - well that's ITV issue, and an issue they need to sort out. But they're never going to improve their reputation if they're not given a chance. But BBC Worldwide has (probably rightly) got such an excellent reputation that I can't think of any other British company (or indeed European company) that has such an impact on America, or indeed worldwide that spreads it's wings so widely that other companies don't appear to be given a chance (not saying they don't have a chance, but they're not given one).

I'll lay it out in one sentence so it's easier to shoot me down: The BBC (BBC Worldwide anyway) seem to be acting more as a business than a broadcaster. For a non-commercial broadcaster, supported by the public, that just seems slightly wrong to me.

I admit that others see it differently, and that's fair enough. It's all personal opinion, but for what it's worth, that's mine.
Fudd is online now  
Old 05-03-2010, 22:54
Score
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,130
Just read that Fearne Cotton hosted the 2008 series, so I'm not surprised ratings dropped !

Cheers for the numbers - the 2007 figures seem okay and I think the show is something worth looking into for ITV as I bet it'd rate relatively well among the key demos (it couldn't get any worse than Michael Winner!).
Well that would explain it!

I agree that they should look into it, and if this Summer's run does ok I won't be surprised if they do as the current Friday tacic seems to 'throw everything at the wall and see what sticks' which I actually think is good as at least they're trying with new formats. As for Winner, I watched it tonight, and whilst it would clearly be better in the afternoon, I actually found it quite entertaining. It's clearly not something to be taken seriously, and it was quite funny in places, but it just isn't primetime material. ITV could do a lot worse than recommissioning it for an afternoon slot, though.
Score is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 22:59
Danslink
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,101
BBC Northern Ireland did a Last Comic Standing style competition called...

Find Me the Funny
Danslink is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:01
Charnham
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
I'll lay it out in one sentence so it's easier to shoot me down: The BBC (BBC Worldwide anyway) seem to be acting more as a business than a broadcaster.
isnt the point of BBCWW that they act like a business and make money from BBC shows or formats on the international market?

ITV do not have the high ground when it comes to BBCWW, currently two of there shows have BBCWW money invested in them, so if ITV want to start slagging BBCWW off, they should (if it were possible) give that money back.

Meanwhile I think the main reason ABC went with BBCWW format, is that they could call the new show either a "spin-off" or "from the producers of Dancing With the Stars" which is something they would quite like to say about the show, as it links it with Dancing With the Stars.

It also allows them to continue to work with a group of people they already work with well (at least I assume they do) and make it easier for say a judge from Dancing With the Stars, to appear on "Ice Dancing with the Stars"

These things may seem small, but along with the fact ABC know BBCWW can make this show for them, its easy to see why they made this decision.
Charnham is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:10
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
isnt the point of BBCWW that they act like a business and make money from BBC shows or formats on the international market?
Though it says a lot when even Mark Thompson is wondering whether it's too big/powerful (albeit he may be saying that to appease the Tories). I just think it's become too overbearing now, too dominant - unnecessarily so.

ITV do not have the high ground when it comes to BBCWW, currently two of there shows have BBCWW money invested in them, so if ITV want to start slagging BBCWW off, they should (if it were possible) give that money back.
Which two shows are they? Actually...is Primeval getting BBC WW backing? I know another company is helping ITV out with that.

Meanwhile I think the main reason ABC went with BBCWW format, is that they could call the new show either a "spin-off" or "from the producers of Dancing With the Stars" which is something they would quite like to say about the show, as it links it with Dancing With the Stars.

It also allows them to continue to work with a group of people they already work with well (at least I assume they do) and make it easier for say a judge from Dancing With the Stars, to appear on "Ice Dancing with the Stars"

These things may seem small, but along with the fact ABC know BBCWW can make this show for them, its easy to see why they made this decision.
That's true. I think the title is a big thing - by linking it in with Dancing with the Stars they'll probably draw in more viewers. I doubt the BBC would've allowed the 'copying' of the title if ABC had used ITV.
Fudd is online now  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:10
jake lyle
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,924
isnt the point of BBCWW that they act like a business and make money from BBC shows or formats on the international market?

.
Thats exactly their remit.
jake lyle is online now  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:21
jake lyle
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,924
Though it says a lot when even Mark Thompson is wondering whether it's too big/powerful (albeit he may be saying that to appease the Tories). I just think it's become too overbearing now, too dominant - unnecessarily so.
.
He was referring to the non tv arm, publishing radio times, lonely planet etc. Selling and exploiting its tv formats and rights is one thing that none of the political parties disagree with.

That's true. I think the title is a big thing - by linking it in with Dancing with the Stars they'll probably draw in more viewers. I doubt the BBC would've allowed the 'copying' of the title if ABC had used ITV
Obviously. As I said today Itv shoped it around in America and other countries and networks found it too derivative of DWTS.
Fox already tried Skating with celebrities.
Dancing with the stars on ice would be a natural spin off for ABC.

If CBS/NBC picked up DOI independent of DWTS branded a rip off and tacky.
jake lyle is online now  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:24
Jonwo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,020

Which two shows are they? Actually...is Primeval getting BBC WW backing? I know another company is helping ITV out with that.
Primeval is being produced by BBC America, ITV, Prosieben and UKTV, BBC America is owned by BBC Worldwide and Discovery but is has to acquire content from BBC WW and other producers like ITV Global etc
Jonwo is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:26
iaindb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,948
The concept's a bit too narrow I think - at least with Criminal Justice and Five Days you can adapt many stories to suit the format. Collision would always have to involve a, well, collision.
Like Midsomer Murders always involves a murder in a quaint little English village, all from the same part of the country. And it's never just one murder, always a serial killer.

Series 1 of collision was a multiple pile-up. Series 2 could be, for example, a head-on crash involving 2 cars, then across the week we see the effect the crash has on the people's lives. Just hand the task to the talented Anthony Horowitz and I'm sure he'll come up with a suitable story.

I just thought ITV would want to make a second series giving the ratings success of series 1 and series 2 of Five Days.
iaindb is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:33
Charnham
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
Thats exactly their remit.
I would guess that it is rare that ITV & BBCWW would have two formats that are very similar, as is the case here, on the international market.

Which two shows are they? Actually...is Primeval getting BBC WW backing? I know another company is helping ITV out with that.
Primeval is the main one, but there is a small amount of BBC WW money involved in Taggart, I dont think its alot (its officially from UK TV channel Alibi) but its enough for STV to consider it a "partner"


That's true. I think the title is a big thing - by linking it in with Dancing with the Stars they'll probably draw in more viewers. I doubt the BBC would've allowed the 'copying' of the title if ABC had used ITV.
this is very true, BBCWW would be quite right to object if an ITV format was being sold as a spin-off of one its formats.
Charnham is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:34
jake lyle
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,924
I'll lay it out in one sentence so it's easier to shoot me down: The BBC (BBC Worldwide anyway) seem to be acting more as a business than a broadcaster. For a non-commercial broadcaster, supported by the public, that just seems slightly wrong to me.
Its a commercial subsidary of the BBC not a charity for ITV rip offs.


Its mission is to create, acquire, develop and exploit media content and brands around the world in order to maximise the value of the BBC's assets for the benefit of the UK licence payer

http://www.bbcworldwide.com/about-us.aspx
jake lyle is online now  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:41
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
I would guess that it is rare that ITV & BBCWW would have two formats that are very similar, as is the case here, on the international market.

Primeval is the main one, but there is a small amount of BBC WW money involved in Taggart, I dont think its alot (its officially from UK TV channel Alibi) but its enough for STV to consider it a "partner"
With relations between ITV and STV I bet that ITV wouldn't mind giving BBC WW the money back and axing Taggart.

Its a commercial subsidary of the BBC not a charity for ITV rip offs.

http://www.bbcworldwide.com/about-us.aspx
In other words: it's there to make money - even though the BBC get the license fee as it is.
Fudd is online now  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:49
Charnham
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
With relations between ITV and STV I bet that ITV wouldn't mind giving BBC WW the money back and axing Taggart.
this is a recent decision, but if things get any worse between ITV & STV, I know what you mean.

In other words: it's there to make money - even though the BBC get the license fee as it is.
this is the grey area in which BBCWW exisits, in the international market it normally is not a problem.

Its at home it becomes a problem.

Put it this way, should Doctor Who fans be denied the chance to buy a Doctor Who DVD, because the BBC WW will make some profit from that? How do you suggest a Doctor Who DVD makes it to market? should an independent company buy the rights, and bring the DVD to market? would it be right that a profit making company, makes money from the sales of Doctor Who DVD, something created using licence fee payers money.
Charnham is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:50
C14E
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
The only reason the skating show is coming from BBC WW is because of the DWTS link. The Executive Producer has actually worked on DWTS and the director still does. The show will almost certainly air in the usual DWTS slot.

It's nothing to do with ITV Studios not trying or failing so there's no "shame" on their part. They got their show made with FOX several years ago and it failed. And BBC WW (as a production company) aren't some kind of powerhouse in the US, they had no pilots this year and the only show they seem to have apart from DWTS is "Moving Up", a minor reality series on cable network TLC. A string of shows in 2008 and 2009 flopped. Torchwood and Gavin & Stacey were in development this year at FOX & ABC but didn't make it past script stage.

ITV Studios have a hand in Kitchen Nightmares USA and own Hells Kitchen. If FOX wanted to make a skating show again, they would turn to ITV Studios.
C14E is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 23:53
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
this is a recent decision, but if things get any worse between ITV & STV, I know what you mean.

this is the grey area in which BBCWW exisits, in the international market it normally is not a problem.

Its at home it becomes a problem.

Put it this way, should Doctor Who fans be denied the chance to buy a Doctor Who DVD, because the BBC WW will make some profit from that? How do you suggest a Doctor Who DVD makes it to market? should an independent company buy the rights, and bring the DVD to market? would it be right that a profit making company, makes money from the sales of Doctor Who DVD, something created using licence fee payers money.
I'd argue the other way round funnily enough - I'd say at home it shouldn't be a problem. If BBC want to sell Doctor Who merchandise, why not? Same with EastEnders, Ashes to Ashes etc. I'd even go as far as saying that if they want to sell their own shows abroad, that shouldn't be an issue.

For me, what BBC Worldwide shouldn't be doing is either making programmes for other companies abroad that are not to be aired on the BBC or making programmes that are owned by other companies.

I'm defeating my own argument here when I say I object BBC WW making money - I guess I don't really. What I do object is the way they handle things some of the time.
Fudd is online now  
Old 06-03-2010, 00:00
Charnham
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
For me, what BBC Worldwide shouldn't be doing is either making programmes for other companies abroad that are not to be aired on the BBC or making programmes that are owned by other companies.
so BBC WW should not have made Dancing with the Stars with ABC? im sure BBCWW has made alot of money from selling the Strictly Come Dancing format around the world, and that money has gone back to the BBC to top up the licence fee.

I dont see what is wrong with that.

What I do object is the way they handle things some of the time.
the grey area BBCWW exisits invites alot of criticism from all sides, but in this case there was a good reason ABC would have use the BBCWW format and not the ITV format, ITV might well speak up and try to take advantage of public ignorance, but they would be wrong.
Charnham is offline  
Old 06-03-2010, 00:11
Jonwo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,020
Series 1 of collision was a multiple pile-up. Series 2 could be, for example, a head-on crash involving 2 cars, then across the week we see the effect the crash has on the people's lives. Just hand the task to the talented Anthony Horowitz and I'm sure he'll come up with a suitable story.

I just thought ITV would want to make a second series giving the ratings success of series 1 and series 2 of Five Days.
Collision would be a little harder to do but I think Murderland could work well as a stripped series across five days and from five different perpectives rather than the three in the first Murderland.

There is a risk with stripped series that viewers may tire of it.
Jonwo is offline  
Old 06-03-2010, 00:12
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
so BBC WW should not have made Dancing with the Stars with ABC? im sure BBCWW has made alot of money from selling the Strictly Come Dancing format around the world, and that money has gone back to the BBC to top up the licence fee.

I dont see what is wrong with that.
Dancing with the Stars (US) is aired on Watch which is a subsidary (sp) of the BBC, so arguably that is still being aired by the BBC.

The issue with the other versions is that this just increases the difference between BBC and the commercial stations, the BBC has even more money to play with while the country's in recession. BBC WW has such an impact that it's difficult for the other British companies to compete.

the grey area BBCWW exisits invites alot of criticism from all sides, but in this case there was a good reason ABC would have use the BBCWW format and not the ITV format, ITV might well speak up and try to take advantage of public ignorance, but they would be wrong.
I'm surprised ITV haven't spoken up yet to be honest. There are good reasons why ABC may have chosen BBC WW, but BBC WW could've been reasonable and said 'no' as they don;'t produce the original (I know I'll definitely be shot down on this one, but oh well )
Fudd is online now  
 
Closed Thread




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42.