If this story is to be believed, the DOI is permanently off my viewing list.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view...-nets-200-000/
I despair at how these TV execs minds work. I wouldn't pay the nasty little man 2p a show - in fact I wouldn't have employed him beyond series 1.
"Jason may be controversial but, without him, the panel would be dull."
Without him the programme would be pleasant to watch, not cringe making.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view...-nets-200-000/
I despair at how these TV execs minds work. I wouldn't pay the nasty little man 2p a show - in fact I wouldn't have employed him beyond series 1.
"Jason may be controversial but, without him, the panel would be dull."
Without him the programme would be pleasant to watch, not cringe making.



