does anyone else here think that andy is the most annoying character in easenders at the moment, they should never have bought him back after Kat dumped him. and the latest storyline with him sleeping with kat is stupid, eastenders is getting two gangland orientated with the arrival of him and Den.

i say bring back Peggy as soon as possible so maybe she can take over Sam, because she is getting a little too annoying, she needs to be knocked down a peg or too, and then her character will be good again.

He is a total prat

But peggy is worse cant act never could GWANT

andy is the most unrealistic gangsters EVER.

EastEnders' attempts at some kind of gangland menace are pretty laughable - about as convincing as Brookside - *thinks* - even LESS convincing than poor Brookie. But it's like Phil going from being the "good" brother to some kind of East End hardman after Ross Kemp's departure... they try to convince us these characters are gangsters... I know nothing about organised crime but I don't think these loada muppets would get very far!

I agree that the storyline of Andy's character should have completed after the scene where he collected his belongings from Kat.

Yeah someone kill him off quick! He is starting to get on my nerves! Big Gangster wannabe...Give it up Andy you will never be a Kray lol

EE derserves Andy Pandy the pantomime gangster who arrived as a swop for Gabriel the Apeman Kent the pantomime peeler off the Bill.

They both derseve to die as neither of them add anything to their respective programs

Big Pat and Big Mo now they could put the frightners on anyone Scary or what!!!!

What does this prat DO, apart from run the bookies and make the odd loan?

S**gs females connected with the Vic as well

I can't comment on how realistic he is (or i'd have to kill you and put a horses head in your bed)

But I think he's a good character to help stur things up around the square. I hope he stays.

He's just a really lame version of Steve, but at least we know his storyline is going to involve a slap in the face for Sam, so it's ok by me if he stays a bit longer

I think they should just kill him off. Phil and Grant should come back and dispose of him!

That prat pisses me off, he should go to the Italian American gangster streets of New York (where he thinks he belongs because he's so "hard") so we can later hear that he got the shit kicked out of him on his first night there!

by a 94 yr old granny.

I actually really like Andy - and i find him strangely sexy

I understand what you're all saying about him not being menacing enough though - but maybe he'll get more 'violent' in time ?

Maybe but i still dont think EEs needs him as a character at the moment, without him more storlines could be developed further. he isnt an important character and this on going loan bussiness with hi and alfie at the mo is so boring.

That's what I thought too. EE are always trying to clone old characters by bringing in second rate 2-dimensional ones who they hope will bring in the same success.

Andy's a prize git, they should definitely drop him.

He's a ganster wannabe..what kind of beating was that for Alfie anyways? I've seen worse down at the local :P

He even has all his fingers left

I don't reckon he really cared about warning Andy about the loan. He just wanted Kat to realise something was wrong, and rock the boat. He's just a home-wrecker really, he wants toforce Alfie to lie and destroy Kat's faith in him. He also wants to back her into a corner so she'll have to take him up on his "indecent proposal"...

Here's a question: Why didn't the Slaters go to Belinda for the money? Seems much more logical to me.

That is a really good point.

Now North London may have a different breed of hardman/gangster to the EE, but having met a couple of well known North London 'families' in my time, I have to say Andy is about as gangsterish (wayhey, I've made up a word ) as next door's three legged cat. (apologies to next door's cat!)