Originally Posted by mandyxxxx:
“I don't like Jason because of his unnecessarily personal comments and whilst I know the producers believe that they have to have a pantomime villain on the panel, I believe it is totally unnecessary and even sometimes inappropriate and distracting. However.....I do know what you mean about some of Jason's less personal comments. When he forgets to play his "role" and talks to the contestants as real people he can talk sense. If only he would do that all the time
”
“I don't like Jason because of his unnecessarily personal comments and whilst I know the producers believe that they have to have a pantomime villain on the panel, I believe it is totally unnecessary and even sometimes inappropriate and distracting. However.....I do know what you mean about some of Jason's less personal comments. When he forgets to play his "role" and talks to the contestants as real people he can talk sense. If only he would do that all the time
I agree he can talk sense. Pity he chooses not to sometimes, and that he is so childish and unprofessional much of the time. That's what I find disturbing, especially in a judge.
The whole point of a judge is to fair, and he is not. Is he a person fit to decide on the merit of things? By his behaviour on and off the panel I think it is 'fair' to say that this is not the case. Deciding who he is going to 'get' beforehand and thinking up insults which are not as clever as he seems to think they are, saying spitefully, "You can have him!" to Holly and so on ad nauseum.
It's good to have a quirky character, for enlivening things - maybe a comedian - but judges should not behave like mindless idiots.



