|
||||||||
Jeggings |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Down to earth
Posts: 13,673
|
Quote:
Ladies some of you really shouldn't be wearing them.
You do have to be very thin though... |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: By the Sea
Posts: 8,641
|
Quote:
Charlie Brooker on missing out on fashion trends:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...beauty.fashion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: I'm an oik!
Posts: 9,572
|
Quote:
I know. But some of us look great in them.
You do have to be very thin though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 8,047
|
Quote:
Mine aren't like that, they are like proper, stretchy, very thin denim. They are brilliant, I promise you. I got them from George at ASDA.
Quote:
Why are they hideous?
They're similar to skinny jeans, just much more comfortable imo, although I do love skinny jeans as well ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: xxxxx
Posts: 793
|
Quote:
They don't sound too bad. All the ones I've seen are made of the same material as leggings, that cheap sweaty lycra material.
Just a personal opinion, I guess. I don't mind skinny jeans, but these (the ones I've seen) look like 'fake jeans' but with added clinginess and camel toe... I don't really see the point, just wear actual jeans? Plus, even if you did, the long top would hide a multitude of sins!I'm a recent convert and have decided I love jeggings, even at my age! |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Down to earth
Posts: 13,673
|
Quote:
But bear in mind, too thin is even worse than too fat where leggings are concerned!
![]() Depends what you think is too thin I don't think Sienna Miller is for example... |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Down to earth
Posts: 13,673
|
Quote:
Yes, they're leggings with a denim print on them. They're hideous, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 24,469
|
Quote:
There's no such thing as worse than too fat in leggings. It's the worst thing ever.
Depends what you think is too thin I don't think Sienna Miller is for example... (sorry) |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,015
|
Quote:
I know. But some of us look great in them.
You do have to be very thin though... Why? Is there a fashion law? If something feels comfortable on you, doesn't expose private parts to everyone...then if it comes in your size, by all means wear it. Who gives a crap what other people think? |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 65,903
|
Quote:
Why? Is there a fashion law?
If something feels comfortable on you, doesn't expose private parts to everyone...then if it comes in your size, by all means wear it. Who gives a crap what other people think? Too right. People will be delighted to know that Outfit stock them up to a size 26. They are very comfortable (not that I personally take the size 26, but if I did I would wear those and enjoy doing it). I've never wondered whether I have a camel toe in them, but since I always wear a thigh length jacket you would have to lie on the pavement to check. If someone is that desperate, I am happy to entertain them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 863
|
I haven't got any but I might get some now
![]() I like leggings but only with skirts or dresses. You've got to be perfect to wear leggings alone (and even then they're not very flattering) and I'm definitely not that. They do look good with skirts, dresses or shorts though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8,596
|
I think jeggings are brutal looking things, they look like action man or whatever dolls it was that had the trousers painted on or something, I think they are so daggy.
I do wear leggings but only with certain things never ever with them fully exposed (my beehind is always covered is what I mean) it's too much like walking around with a pair of tights on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Essex
Posts: 534
|
I have a pair, paid about £8 for them from Primark and they are very comfortable.
I'm not a large lady, size 12 but short so I wear them tucked into Uggs and with a longer top over them to cover any slight hint of camel toe and backside
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,321
|
I saw a largest lady wearing them today and the was a very large camel toe effect.
Actually the camel toe was so distinctive that a couple of lads tried to park their bikes in there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 5,420
|
I HATE jeggings, they're vile garments. I think they should all be rounded up and burnt ASAP. Even on thin women I think they look awful, particularly if they're acid wash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,015
|
Quote:
Why? Is there a fashion law?
If something feels comfortable on you, doesn't expose private parts to everyone...then if it comes in your size, by all means wear it. Who gives a crap what other people think? Quote:
Too right. People will be delighted to know that Outfit stock them up to a size 26. They are very comfortable (not that I personally take the size 26, but if I did I would wear those and enjoy doing it). I've never wondered whether I have a camel toe in them, but since I always wear a thigh length jacket you would have to lie on the pavement to check. If someone is that desperate, I am happy to entertain them. LMAO!! You go girl! |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,462
|
Quote:
There's no such thing as worse than too fat in leggings.
Case in point: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2777/...ed6cd0b5_o.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4,904
|
Jeggings ewww but they are 'out' now so it doesn't matter
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 65,903
|
Quote:
I saw a largest lady wearing them today and the was a very large camel toe effect.
Actually the camel toe was so distinctive that a couple of lads tried to park their bikes in there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,743
|
Quote:
Yes, they're leggings with a denim print on them. They're hideous, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,362
|
I think that men look odd in the colour pink and when they wear cardigans, but I would never tell them or hold it against them. Even Gordon Brown wears pink ties.
My OH wouldn't be seen dead in that colour. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,304
|
I wasn't a fan but got a pair recently from uniqlo and they are very comfortable and look like skinny jeans but without the high price tag. They are also a dark color so more flattering. I thought jeggings were hideous on most people when I'd see on the high st, girls wearing ones that were made of thin material and you can see the lumps and bumps, and the color was fading on the thighs, as well as visible camel toe. But the uniqlo ones are very good and all the things I hated about them just doesn't happen with these ones.
They fit into boots with minimal fuss and considering they cost me £15 as opposed to my skinny jeans that cost over £100 - it was a bargain! |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,574
|
Quote:
Ladies some of you really shouldn't be wearing them.
Lol some people on here.. :yawn: ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,792
|
They are vile, hopefully they won't be in fashion too much longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,792
|
Quote:
I saw a largest lady wearing them today and the was a very large camel toe effect.
Actually the camel toe was so distinctive that a couple of lads tried to park their bikes in there.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:48.




