Jason is losing what little credibility he may have had with his remarks throughout the week.
He can offer constructive criticism and he can make salient points about performances (although I don't see the need to camouflage quite so many in relatively obscure similes). However, he now seems to be displaying his bias so obviously that something should really be said. Both Sharron last week and Emily this were victims of this; I definitely feel he'd pre-judged them and both mark and comments were decided before watching the routine (if he actually did properly watch the routine). Saying that someone should go before they've actually performed is wrong when you're responsible for judging them - how can anyone have any confidence in your objectivity once you've done that?
He can offer constructive criticism and he can make salient points about performances (although I don't see the need to camouflage quite so many in relatively obscure similes). However, he now seems to be displaying his bias so obviously that something should really be said. Both Sharron last week and Emily this were victims of this; I definitely feel he'd pre-judged them and both mark and comments were decided before watching the routine (if he actually did properly watch the routine). Saying that someone should go before they've actually performed is wrong when you're responsible for judging them - how can anyone have any confidence in your objectivity once you've done that?





.