DS Forums

 
 

Is that really Jacko?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24-09-2001, 18:30
Gopher
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,789

Is any1 else a little suspicious that in his new video Michael Jackson appears in about 1% of it?Anytime it shows him doing any of his trademark fancy dancing his face is deliberately darkened so as not to see his face?Which leaves me wondering if its really him dancing at all?
Gopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 24-09-2001, 18:40
steveplatt83
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London
Posts: 362
i think it is him but he is just a little ashamed to let people see his face! he has his hat covering some of it then big shadow over the rest! u can just about see his mouth and now and again it looks like he is wearing a mask! the video isnt all that anyway! the only good point is chris tucker!
steveplatt83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2001, 21:27
Mossy Monk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,192
i think it is him, and it really isn't a great video. anyone see the long version yet? is it any good? it would wanna be for $3million
Mossy Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2001, 13:36
micksea241
 
Posts: n/a
It is Jacko that's in this new video and boy he looks old. For whatever age he is he looks as if he's in his 60's/70's. It must be all the plastic surgeory that he had.

$3 million dollars to make a Jacko video is nothing compared he spent $15 million making the Thriller video and $32 million making the video to Black & White.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-09-2001, 18:33
Gopher
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,789
How the flying f*ck did he manage to spend 3 mil on it ?I mean take it into consideration
A camera and sound crew
A director
About a dozen or less extras
A fake bar scene
Chris Tucker
And all that costs 3 million all together?Bloody hellfire!!!
Gopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-09-2001, 09:55
paulhudson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 19
Its definatey him, in the long version of the video he shows his face. Its a good song, not so sure about the video...
paulhudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2001, 15:47
Thomasd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Thetford
Posts: 4
The reason it cost $3 million was probably Chris Tucker. You know what hes like
Thomasd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2001, 19:08
Gopher
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,789
I think i noticed Marlon Brando by the bar as well,so that could help count it up.
Gopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2001, 19:10
Gopher
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,789
Speaking of the video i saw one of his old ones on Play UK yesterday[didnt get the name]and it bears remarkable resemblence to the new one.
Gopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2001, 01:12
Mossy Monk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,192
probably Smooth Criminal seeing as everyone is playing it since Alien Ant Farm did the cover
Mossy Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2001, 18:20
Jason C
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bexleyheath, SE London
Posts: 17,413
Originally posted by micksea241
$3 million dollars to make a Jacko video is nothing compared he spent $15 million making the Thriller video and $32 million making the video to Black & White.
What? The "Thriller" and "Black & White" videos didn't cost anywhere near those amounts.

I think "Scream" is the most expensive video of all time at $5.5m.
Jason C is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:14.