Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“I already agreed with you on that point, and I could see where you were coming from. I'm equally sure though, that some people who have for weeks stated that Hayley is overmarked (ergo they implied that the judges don't know what they are doing; and there were quite a few of them on here), are now using the "judges know what they are doing" stance when it comes to defending Daniella
. We are after all human, and it depends where our loyalties lie. ”
“I already agreed with you on that point, and I could see where you were coming from. I'm equally sure though, that some people who have for weeks stated that Hayley is overmarked (ergo they implied that the judges don't know what they are doing; and there were quite a few of them on here), are now using the "judges know what they are doing" stance when it comes to defending Daniella
. We are after all human, and it depends where our loyalties lie. ”
Disagreeing with the judges, or saying someone is over-marked, is not implying that the judges don't know what they're doing.
We are not stuck with a choice only between agreeing with the judges vs saying they don't know what they're doing or that they're lying or that they've been "taken in" or any of the other things that have been used to imply that there's something questionable about disagreeing with the judges.
This week, the same mistake is being made in a different form when people who disagree with the judges take it further and say the judges are "manipulating" the results or similar.





.
).”
”
.