Originally Posted by mushymanrob:
“of course it matters, it matters that historic facts are upheld...
...and bjork has? imho i dont rate bjork one bit. kate bush is our greatest ever female talent bar none. siouxsie ovehyped?
..... yeah right, thats why her self created music and fashions are still very much alive today in the indie scene, besides she unwittingly created 'goth' . if anything she is not getting the true recognition she richly deserves.
i think you are being too hard on them m8, they are still much more then 'another name on the back of an 80's compilation cd'...”
“of course it matters, it matters that historic facts are upheld...
...and bjork has? imho i dont rate bjork one bit. kate bush is our greatest ever female talent bar none. siouxsie ovehyped?
..... yeah right, thats why her self created music and fashions are still very much alive today in the indie scene, besides she unwittingly created 'goth' . if anything she is not getting the true recognition she richly deserves. i think you are being too hard on them m8, they are still much more then 'another name on the back of an 80's compilation cd'...”
As I said, they have their places in history - nobody could and would deny that, however thesedays they simply ARE 80s icons.
You dont rate Bjork so im going to assume your knowledge of her is minimal at best. She is an innovator - each album sounds different and uses different technology which she puts her all into. Couple that with her dedication to touring, providing quality multiformat releases to her fans and of course providing launchpads for new artists to release their music...I dunno, I dont see how she can be slated?



