I see nothing wrong with replacing an actor with another one playing the same role. They could have brought back Den Watts years ago, and no-one would have remembered the original. Who needs the same Michelle Fowler actress back? Get another one. These guys are ten a penny, and think they've won the lottery when they get a regular gig on a soap, paying much more than their talent is worth.
If any lippy thespian steps out of line, I say sack them toute suite and replace them. It's not difficult, and the previous actor would be forgotten in a couple of weeks. Maybe you would want to hang onto the talented ones, but I say, if in doubt, chuck em out!
If done on a regular basis, it wouldn't be such a news story with all of the associated hoo ha. They did it with Dr Who, Sam Mitchell, Tracy Barlow etc. These actors don't own the characters. If Eastenders want to bring back Grant Mitchell, why don't they just do it without making the appeals to baldy boy?
This way we get the storylines we, and the writers, want and the actors can feel free to move on to "pursue other more demanding ventures".
Rudi
I originally posted this on another thread, but felt it was relevant to start a new thread on the subject.
If any lippy thespian steps out of line, I say sack them toute suite and replace them. It's not difficult, and the previous actor would be forgotten in a couple of weeks. Maybe you would want to hang onto the talented ones, but I say, if in doubt, chuck em out!
If done on a regular basis, it wouldn't be such a news story with all of the associated hoo ha. They did it with Dr Who, Sam Mitchell, Tracy Barlow etc. These actors don't own the characters. If Eastenders want to bring back Grant Mitchell, why don't they just do it without making the appeals to baldy boy?
This way we get the storylines we, and the writers, want and the actors can feel free to move on to "pursue other more demanding ventures".
Rudi
I originally posted this on another thread, but felt it was relevant to start a new thread on the subject.
its a start