• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 8) (Merged)
<<
<
153 of 201
>>
>
Brekkie
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“It's about quality not quantity, Jake. ”

Sky News and quality- I don't think so!


Any predictions for election night then. It's obvious the BBC will win hands down and ITV will be beat at least 2:1 - probably 3:1. I think C4's Alternative Election Night will suffer from it being a close call - it would have done better in 2001/2005 when the result wasn't really in doubt, so I'm betting 1.5m at most.


I think the real battle is with HD - could Sky News HD top BBC HD?
rzt
05-05-2010
Strong ratings for EastEnders and Holby City last night - they're both about 1m up from the equivalent episodes last year. Luther started very well and the BBC could be onto something here - they need to find new drama hits with returnable potential as quite a few of their current ones are near the end of their lifespans (Waking the Dead, A2A, Spooks...). The important number for Luther will be next week to see how much the drop-off is. I hope it holds 5m+ as I enjoyed it, but judging by the DS thread I'm probably in the minority.

Same old story for ITV1: poor. On Five, CSI got completely squeezed out by the two other crime dramas (mainly Luther). I can't remember the last time it fell to as low as 1.8m. La La Land on BBC3 is rating poorly considering it got a 1m inheritance from the 'Enders repeat.
gottago
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“It's about quality not quantity, Jake. ”

Er... where's the quality then?!
Dancc
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by gottago:
“Er... where's the quality then?!”

I've already cited one example of excellent journalism by a Five/BSkyB journalist in the past 24 hours, that's quite enough for the moment.

I do think overall Sky have a stronger team. Only notable exception is Kay Burley but she has been there since the beginning and it seems they are too scared to get rid of her.
D.M.N.
05-05-2010
I think I'll stick with BBC. Don't really want to see Sky getting all happy as the Conservative votes come through.

Same old story in ratings: Good night for BBC, bad night for ITV. Surprising, because on Sunday and Monday it was the other way around.

Maybe ITV only deliver on Bank Holidays?

- Easter Monday: Frost brings 8m+.
- May 4th: ITV win night.
- May 31st: Britain's Got Talent brings ???m.
Salv*
05-05-2010
Theres defenitley a strong BBC1 lineup there last night... with very strong ratings from Holby City and Luther.

ITV yet again, the Tuesday flop zone took action. The Bill's ratings are just so bad at the moment.

Decent night for C4 suprisingly with three shows in a row getting 2m+ which doesnt happen much on there.
mlt11
05-05-2010
News ratings last night?
jake lyle
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“.

I do think overall Sky have a stronger team.”


[spits drink out at the screen.]
I suppose you didn't see Niall Pattersons reports outside bigotgate womans house last week.

Quote:
“Amazingly, Gordon Brown's apology was not even the most pathetic of the day, with that honour held by Sky reporter Niall Paterson. "Mrs Duffy is a Sky News viewer," he told the camera, because there is simply no endorsement of Rupert Murdoch's network too irrelevant to the matter in hand to go untrumpeted. "So, if you are watching, Mrs Duffy, on behalf of the people who've been camped outside of your house, we apologise for putting you through all this," mugged Niall, continuing to camp outside her house and put her through it.”



http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...te-marina-hyde
Cent
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by jake lyle:
“ spits drink out at the screen.
I suppose you didn't see Niall Pattersons reports outside bigotgate womans house last week.



http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...te-marina-hyde”

I saw that moment. His behaviour that day was awful quite frankly.

Her tugged on her jacket at least twice as she tried to walk away from him to ask her more questions about how much she hates Gordon Brown. She must have said about 10 times she had to go.

She didn't say she was a Sky News viewer either, he bombarded her with questions and she was just trying to get rid of him, she said something like "Oh, yeh... thats a good one..." when he asked if she likes Sky News. Cue him 15 mins later saying "Mrs Duffy informed us she is a big Sky News fan".

Then when they were asked to move off her private property he stood still with the Sky News camera while all the other journalists left.
GeorgeS
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by Cent:
“I saw that moment. His behaviour that day was awful quite frankly.”

No it wasnt. He was no different to Ian Watson.
GeorgeS
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by jake lyle:
“http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...te-marina-hyde”

Martina Hyde should know about filler material. Her whole career is composed around it.

Even though she has a full day to write this tripe.
rzt
05-05-2010
Schedules for 15th-21st May have been confirmed: The Prisoner, Marco's Kitchen Burnout and Modern Masters all keep their current slots.

There is an extra Holby City episode on Wednesday, which bumps Waterloo Road for the week. ITV1 has British Soap Awards that Wednesday, starting at 19:30 which means it'll be half an hour longer than normal.

Also, although not confirmed until next week, some reports saying that An Audience with Michael Buble will be on Sunday 23rd May for ITV1. If that's true, it'll be a jampacked night for ITV1, possibly going: 18.00: The Seasons, 19.00 Audience with..., 20:00 Britain's Got Talent, 21:00 Lewis
D.M.N.
05-05-2010
So that we don't get an influx of 'how did past elections rate' in the next few days...

1997 (May 1st)
BBC One
21:55 to 01:00 - 6.5m

ITV1
21:55 to 01:00 - 3.2m

----

2001 (June 7th)
BBC One
21:55 to 01:00 - 5.4m (41%)
* peak: 5.8m @ 23:00

ITV1
21:55 to 01:00 - 2.3m (17%)
* peak: 3.7m @ start

Sky News - peak: 0.29m
BBC News 24 - peak: 0.20m
ITV News Channel - peak: 0.06m

----

2005 (May 5th)
BBC One
21:55 to 02:00 - 4.2m (35%)
* 21:55 to 01:00 - 4.7m (33%)
* 01:00 to 02:00 - 2.6m (41%)
* peak: 6.0m @ 22:45

ITV1
21:55 to 02:00 - 1.7m (15%)
* 21:55 to 01:00 - 2.0m (14%)
* peak: 2.3m @ 22:45

Five
00:00 to 01:00 - 0.2m (3%)

Sky News
21:00 to 01:00 - 0.11m
* peak: 0.22m @ 22:45

BBC News 24
21:00 to 01:00 - 0.07m

ITV News Channel
21:00 to 01:00 - 0.02m

----

2008 (November 4th) - United States Election
BBC One
23:20 to 06:00 - 1.3m (25%)
* peak: 1.6m @ 00:00

ITV1
23:45 to 06:00 - 0.3m (7%)

----

Sources: Media Guardian, Digital Spy
D.M.N.
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by rzt:
“There is an extra Holby City episode on Wednesday, which bumps Waterloo Road for the week.”

And the BSI strikes again, because if my calculations are correct it means the final episode of Waterloo Road will be in World Cup week.
Andy23
05-05-2010
Why on earth would they take off Waterloo Road to show an extra Holby City, isn't Holby City on enough as it is?

--

Regarding The Bill, I think it is the name 'The Bill' which is the problem at the moment.

Viewers who liked the old Bill but don't like the new version have switched off, and few new viewers have switched
on because it's still The Bill. A show they didn't watch 20 years ago and don't watch now.

I bet if they launched a new police drama with exactly the same scripts as The Bill but with different character
names and different actors, the show would get double the ratings.
Brekkie
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by rzt:
“Schedules for 15th-21st May have been confirmed: The Prisoner, Marco's Kitchen Burnout and Modern Masters all keep their current slots.”

Why on earth do they bother hiring schedulers when they're not fixing the obvious.

Quote:
“There is an extra Holby City episode on Wednesday, which bumps Waterloo Road for the week. ITV1 has British Soap Awards that Wednesday, starting at 19:30 which means it'll be half an hour longer than normal.”

The BBC once again taking the same old attitude to the World Cup.

Rather than doing what any sensible organisation would do and not commission episodes to run during an event you've known you'll be broadcasting for years they of course commission them and push everything else around the schedules to accommodate them.
D.M.N.
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by rzt:
“Also, although not confirmed until next week, some reports saying that An Audience with Michael Buble will be on Sunday 23rd May for ITV1. If that's true, it'll be a jampacked night for ITV1, possibly going: 18.00: The Seasons, 19.00 Audience with..., 20:00 Britain's Got Talent, 21:00 Lewis”

Don't forget though that Coronation Street may need to go there as it loses two episodes on Monday 24th May due to an England game. Depending on where ITV schedule it, of course.

Plus The Prisoner loses an episode on 22nd May due to the Champions League Final, but I suspect no one really cares about that!
sstripling
05-05-2010
Thought this would intrest some.

Quote:
“BBC1 and ITV1 also have plans to clear out their daytime schedules on Friday – even popular shows such as Loose Women – if the outcome of the election is still uncertain.

Both have scheduled their Election 2010 programmes to run from 9.55pm on Thursday night to 6am the following morning. BBC1's Breakfast Election 2010 Special will then run from 6am until 2pm on Friday, ahead of a 45 minute news bulletin.

ITV1 plans to go over to GMTV as normal between 6am and 9.25am, featuring election coverage, before Katie Derham pickes up the baton for more Election 2010 between 9.25am and 10.30am.

The network is then scheduled to revert to its normal daytime line-up, starting with This Morning and Loose Women – depending on the outcome of the election.

"We could be here until 6pm Friday," said Oliver, although he stressed Dimbleby will get a break when BBC Breakfast airs.

Etchingham said: "I'm due to go until 9am and then do News at Ten that night."

A veteran of general election nights, Stewart concluded: "It can't not be interesting, whatever the outcome. It's too close to call but it's going to be an historic election."

Perhaps the only thing the broadcasters can predict is the inevitable complaints from some viewers about their regular programmes being disrupted.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010...10-tv-coverage”

I defiantely agree with the last bit!
tka
05-05-2010
I hope not, I quite like This Morning and Loose Women and will want to get away from overkill of election coverage
Dancc
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by jake lyle:
“ [spits drink out at the screen.]
I suppose you didn't see Niall Pattersons reports outside bigotgate womans house last week.



http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...te-marina-hyde”

Stephen Glover at The Independent also saw it...and praised Niall and Sky News for their coverage:

Quote:
“Sky chase the limits

No one seems to have given proper due to the role of Sky News in the Gordon Brown/Gillian Duffy affair last week. More even than the BBC News Channel, Sky News provides day-by-day, hour-by-hour coverage of what is happening on the stump, no doubt for the edification of no more than a few hundred thousand viewers at any one time. A lot of it is pretty tedious stuff, but no one could say that Sky News is not serving the democratic interest.

Last Wednesday BBC News Channel reporters were also following Mr Brown in Rochdale, along with many newspaper hacks. The BBC was outmanoeuvred by Sky News, which got the best footage. Its reporter Niall Paterson appears to have been particularly quick on the uptake. I can't help wondering whether, if it has been a BBC microphone left on the Prime Minister's lapel rather than a Sky News one, the Corporation would have released the damning tape. At the very least, telephone calls would have been made to London, whereas the Sky News people made up their minds on the spot.”

Source & more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/me...r-1960890.html

So to be honest I'm not sure the attacks on Niall are very justified. Indeed he has come under fire a lot recently from barely articulate and occasionally abusive users on Twitter, but has always taken time to respond to his critics.

A brief scan through his Tweet history will show he is far from anti-Labour:

http://twitter.com/niallpaterson/status/13298277057
http://twitter.com/niallpaterson/status/13313865398
http://twitter.com/niallpaterson/status/13358492018
sn_22
05-05-2010
Great night for BBC One. EastEnders had an excellent share and the Hobly rating is superb too. Luther enjoyed a very good inheritance and seems to have done well with it. It'll be interesting to see if it can sustain those figures.

Awful night again for ITV and especially The Bill. Still, least its not in The Prisoner / Modern Masters territory.
Jaycee Dove
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by derek500:
“And another 56,000 on the HD simulcast.

I can't believe with 15% of the UK population now having access to ITV HD, their figures are so low!!”

As I said there before there is something not quite right about the HD figures, suggesting that the way rating of these works is somehow flawed.

The argument raised here was that some shows are just more watchable in HD than others....as in Doctor Who would attract HD viewers but Over the Rainbow would not.

To a degree, perhaps. But if 6.5 million watch Doctor Who and 5 million watch Over the Rainbow but half a million watch DW in HD and next to nobody Over the Rainbow in HD this does not look correct.

Both are on one after the other on both BBC 1 and BBC HD and many viewers surely just stay on the channel they are tuned to.

I suspect there are several factors why many of the 15% potential audience are not watching ITV HD.

Many Sky viewers may not even realise it is there. It was never promoted and I have seen several posts from people spotting it in the EPG a month late for the first time.

Moreover, it takes effort to switch from your local ITV region to ITV HD and if most people have no clue what is in HD and what is not, may just stick with that they have. Because ITV HD simulcasts the London news, weather and local programming anyone outside that area is told to tune elsewhere. How many bother to come back?

Viewers prefer an easy life and many may have just chosen to stick with their local ITV rather than the HD version of London ITV.
C14E
05-05-2010
ABC:
8pm - Dancing With The Stars - 11.92m (2.4)
* Ties last weeks all time series low
9pm - Lost - 9.50m (3.9)
* Up 5% from last original episode
10pm - V - 5.58m (2.2)
* Finished last in the hour
* Lost 44% of its lead-in

CBS:
8pm - NCIS - 14.83m (3.1)
* Season low
9pm - NCIS:LA - 14.22m (2.9)
* Series low
10pm - The Good Wife - 12.94m (2.4)
* Up 9% from last episode

FOX:
8pm - American Idol - 17.08m (6.0)
* Lowest 18-49 rating since July 2002
* Lowest adults 18-34 rating ever
* Lowest household rating, average viewership & adults 25 since August 2002
* Down 24% from equivalent night last year (A18-49)
9pm - Glee - 11.89m (4.9)
* Down 6% from last week
* Likely to be adjusted down in final ratings

NBC:
8pm - The Biggest Loser - 8.34m (3.2)
* Up 14% from last week
10pm - Parenthood - 5.96m (2.6)
* Won the 10pm hour among adults 18-49
* Up 8% from last week

Tvbythenumbers

Some horrible ratings there, not often that NBC are the only ones smiling!
dave01
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“As I said there before there is something not quite right about the HD figures, suggesting that the way rating of these works is somehow flawed.

The argument raised here was that some shows are just more watchable in HD than others....as in Doctor Who would attract HD viewers but Over the Rainbow would not.

To a degree, perhaps. But if 6.5 million watch Doctor Who and 5 million watch Over the Rainbow but half a million watch DW in HD and next to nobody Over the Rainbow in HD this does not look correct.

Both are on one after the other on both BBC 1 and BBC HD and many viewers surely just stay on the channel they are tuned to.

I suspect there are several factors why many of the 15% potential audience are not watching ITV HD.

Many Sky viewers may not even realise it is there. It was never promoted and I have seen several posts from people spotting it in the EPG a month late for the first time.

Moreover, it takes effort to switch from your local ITV region to ITV HD and if most people have no clue what is in HD and what is not, may just stick with that they have. Because ITV HD simulcasts the London news, weather and local programming anyone outside that area is told to tune elsewhere. How many bother to come back?

Viewers prefer an easy life and many may have just chosen to stick with their local ITV rather than the HD version of London ITV.”

I agree, it is odd how low the HD figures are at present.
ITV are apparantly going to add regional feeds to their HD channel next month, this could boost HD viewing a bit (see below).

Quote:
“Regional Reporting
We have been informed that the channel ITV1 HD/GMTV HD will replace the London-based feed with regional feeds in some areas on 1st June, 2010.

Also from 1st June, 2010 ITV1 HD (but not GMTV HD) will be available in Scotland.”

Source: Attentional
Pizzatheaction
05-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“* Kay Burley in Kirkcaldy with Gordon Brown”

She'll love that!
<<
<
153 of 201
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map