• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Past Reality Shows
  • Over the Rainbow
Over The Rainbow Non-Appreciation thread
<<
<
14 of 51
>>
>
dottiep
18-04-2010
What the h*ll is that awful John doing on this panel. A fine cheek he has criticising any one of the girls for anything. He is the worst actor ever on Eastenders. The sooner he is booted out the better. What a creep.Ugh!
Vivadiva
18-04-2010
-Their outfits are absolutely bloody terrible. Dani last night looked like a librarian doing 'All That Jazz' in that get-up. Who dressed these girls? Helen Keller?!

-Whenever they do a dance number, I find the choreography naff and amateurish. Emilie last week, when she performed 'The Boy Does Nothing', through no fault of her own, could never amount to more than a holiday rep in Benidorm, who dreams of enetertaining on Broadway yet is stuck looking after 12 year olds and fishing plasters out of the jacuzzi.

-Unlike these shows in other years, I dislike some of the girls' personalities. Jessica's whole 'I'm mad, me' started grating the minute she walked into her audition and Jennie seems very hard to me. The sort of girl who rather than going with the Tin Man and Lion would tell them where they could shove it.
kassieq
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by sofakat:
“All fairly shite apart from Steph, as usual.

Isn't her mother a knockout?

I'd love to hear Graham N discussing it off camera with his buddies. I don't know how he keeps a straight face on camera.”

Never mind her mother, her dad is rather mmm.

How did you enjoy the film, which one was it. I particularly love Volver, it was laugh out loud funny also Penelope Cruz is one woman I would kill to look like.
isopap
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by kassieq:
“Never mind her mother, her dad is rather mmm.
”

A little Sunday morning treat for you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFCEA...eature=related
kassieq
18-04-2010
JP bleating on an on about choreography, which seems to consist of the adding of male dancers and that's it, also how can you do much pertinent choregraphy to slow songs. My favourite is still Steph, and I disagee with ALW I think she would make a believable Dorothy, she has a vulnerability that most of the others lack.

Just one questions are the sacked Dorothys holed up in the wall behind their shoes? and does the final Dorothy get encased in the bubble along side the red shoes?

Jessica outdid herself with gurning tonight, and she cannot dance with any grace.

Also big thumbs down to the choreography for America, the original stage version only had the girls and that would have worked much better on that small stage, the boys were added to the movie version. The camera work sucked too.
kassieq
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by isopap:
“A little Sunday morning treat for you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFCEA...eature=related”

Thanks, enjoyed that
sofakat
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by kassieq:
“Never mind her mother, her dad is rather mmm.

How did you enjoy the film, which one was it. I particularly love Volver, it was laugh out loud funny also Penelope Cruz is one woman I would kill to look like.”

Yes, he is rather kass

I loved Volver as well. I'm a great Almodovar fan. I watched 'Broken Embraces' last night and, whilst Cruz was as exquisite and luminous as ever, I was a tad disappointed. It was very uneven and even irritating in places. You can rarely fault the acting - he brings out the best in everyone - but the plots can be jerky and drag in places.

Not his best, but in places quite breathtaking and deeply felt.

Cruz is definitely one of the most beautiful women in the world. No wonder she bagged the divine Javier Bardem. Lucky woman!
sofakat
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by isopap:
“A little Sunday morning treat for you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFCEA...eature=related”


Oh, nice. My era. Yeah...................
Winehouse
18-04-2010
When one of the panel (on this occasion John Partridge) is featured on the programme giving one of the girls (in this case Sophie) 'special' coaching, is he then going to turn around on the live show and tell her she once again failed miserably?

Or is he instead going to shower her with fake platitudes in order to endorse his own reputation?

Hmmm, I wonder?
sofakat
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by Winehouse:
“When one of the panel (on this occasion John Partridge) is featured on the programme giving one of the girls (in this case Sophie) 'special' coaching, is he then going to turn around on the live show and tell her she once again failed miserably?

Or is he instead going to shower her with fake platitudes in order to endorse his own reputation?

Hmmm, I wonder?”

I found the very idea of coaching from some dead beat, whose only claim to fame is being in Eastenders (purleeese?) just farcical. What does he know? Put it on the back of a fag packet.
Winehouse
18-04-2010
Why all the criticism for Emilie I wonder? After all, most of the girls dropped to her level this week, and at least she was occasionally singing the right tune.

Fit them all with a satnav in future I say, so then they at least have a chance of finding the right note.
Winehouse
18-04-2010
Congratulations to the wardrobe department.

They take a beautiful girl like Sophie and end up making her look like the 'Wicked Witch of the North.'
Winehouse
18-04-2010
What did Stephanie's given song and performance have to do with a future 'Dorothy'?

I don't ever remember Judy Garland wriggling around under a polka dot handkerchief.

Really.
SheShe
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by Winehouse:
“What did Stephanie's given song and performance have to do with a future 'Dorothy'?

I don't ever remember Judy Garland wriggling around under a polka dot handkerchief.

Really.”


That was a spectacularly horrible dress!
Diorelli
18-04-2010
Well, we already worked out the wardrobe people must be blind, this week they've proven they're also deaf after ignoring the impassioned plea from ALW. The wardrobe people are just impervious to criticism.

Why was Dani dressed as a librarian singing "One Night Only" unless the wardrobe people really have a sarcastic and dry sense of humour?

Sophie looked like an upside down cupcake and WTF was Jessica wearing - a curtain underneath a pleather jacket doesn't make it edgier. It still is a curtain. :/
kassieq
18-04-2010
Thought Emilie did quite well this week, although what the heck did having her sat on the floor with a someones head in her lap have to do with Moon River - well I give up.

Why do they bother with choreographing the songs, let the girls sing and interpret them in their own way and then have a choregraphed group number all at the same time to the same song, and no fellas please, surely that would give a better idea.
kassieq
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by sofakat:
“I found the very idea of coaching from some dead beat, whose only claim to fame is being in Eastenders (purleeese?) just farcical. What does he know? Put it on the back of a fag packet.”

Glad I am not alone in a) never having heard of JP (sorry can't stand Eastenders) and b) never wishing to hear of him again.
Winehouse
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by kassieq:
“Thought Emilie did quite well this week, although what the heck did having her sat on the floor with a someones head in her lap have to do with Moon River - well I give up.

Why do they bother with choreographing the songs, let the girls sing and interpret them in their own way and then have a choregraphed group number all at the same time to the same song, and no fellas please, surely that would give a better idea.”

Of course it would.

But no, the dreadful BBC insist on 'depersonalising' these poor girls at every single opportunity and instead turning them into clones of Britney Spears at a high school piss-up.
Winehouse
18-04-2010
Multi-tasking at its best, Jessica is simply marvellous.

Who would have thought it possible to engage in such facial gymnastics while gurning their way through another set of totally unsuitable lyrics.
kassieq
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by Winehouse:
“Multi-tasking at its best, Jessica is simply marvellous.

Who would have thought it possible to engage in such facial gymnastics while gurning their way through another set of totally unsuitable lyrics.”

She outdid herself this week, can you imagine having to sit through a whole show of that it really wasn't very good, and her dancing is of the fairy elephant variety.
Winehouse
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by kassieq:
“She outdid herself this week, can you imagine having to sit through a whole show of that it really wasn't very good, and her dancing is of the fairy elephant variety.”

Aye, she always looks like she's trying to suck spaghetti through a tennis racket.
sofakat
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by Winehouse:
“Aye, she always looks like she's trying to suck spaghetti through a tennis racket.”

It was nuts. She wasn't even singing half the time but instead doing a kind of breathy rasp.

Choreography was particularly hard for her because she can't dance or even move adequately on stage. I assumed singing and dancing at the same time was beyond her. She's barking mad and has a slight speech impediment (yes, I know that is not her fault but it won't help her at all) and a horrible accent, so what on earth is she even there for? Entertainement value? Bit cruel dontcha think?

She is positively lumpen on stage. Put her out of her misery, soon.
sofakat
18-04-2010
the choreography is pants and the dancers just aren't very good.

Has Nigel Lithgoe come out of retirement to do some work with those hoofers? Maybe he got bored?

Let's face it, the style is circa 1979 and they can't even keep time with each other.
sofakat
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by Diorelli:
“
Sophie looked like an upside down cupcake and WTF was Jessica wearing - a curtain underneath a pleather jacket doesn't make it edgier. It still is a curtain. :/”

Brilliant!
Winehouse
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by sofakat:
“the choreography is pants and the dancers just aren't very good.

Has Nigel Lithgoe come out of retirement to do some work with those hoofers? Maybe he got bored?

Let's face it, the style is circa 1979 and they can't even keep time with each other.”

They were supposed to be dancers?

I thought they were just various randoms with itching powder down their pants who had invaded the stage.

<<
<
14 of 51
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map