|
||||||||
sugababes vs girls aloud |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 499
|
sugababes vs girls aloud
who do you prefer? and why?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,202
|
which version of the sugababes, exactly?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
|
girls aloud as they have catchy tunes I like
dont much like the group of girls themselves though couldnt even name a sugababes song but I know they've done a few rip offs...think all the girls are a bit rough |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,212
|
Girls Aloud. Better, more catchy songs, better members you can relate too, they look a lot better, more media friendly.
But I do like the Sugababes aswell. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,718
|
Sugababes 4.0 nah, not so much - but with Keisha and Mutya, much preferred to GA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ♥Albert Square♥
Posts: 4,027
|
Girls Aloud
Their music is better and they don't keep changing their members!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wee Highland Cottage
Posts: 19,836
|
Sugababes because they can sing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
|
Quote:
Sugababes because they can sing
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 41
|
In order of favourite:
2nd Sugababes lineup GirlsAloud 1st Sugababes lineup 3rd Sugababes lineup Now there are no more Sugababes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 217
|
I prefer Girls Aloud... Their music is fun, catchy and very danceable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wee Highland Cottage
Posts: 19,836
|
Quote:
can they? heidi is terrible...the only one that could sing left ages ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
|
yes that one
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wee Highland Cottage
Posts: 19,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
UM, ROFL TBH!
Jade Ewen can outsing every member of the Sugababes past/present as well as Girls Aloud. Mutya who? |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 10,011
|
Quote:
UM, ROFL TBH!
Jade Ewen can outsing every member of the Sugababes past/present as well as Girls Aloud. Mutya who?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 499
|
Quote:
Girls Aloud. Better, more catchy songs, better members you can relate too, they look a lot better, more media friendly.
i prefer girls aloud because they have really good songs, and u remember them (love machine, sound of the under... , jump) but with sugababes i cant tell who it is when they come on the radio. also the members of GA are much more likeable in interviews and stuff, they might not be brilliant singers but are great performers and sound great auto tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,202
|
none of the 11 girls can sing all that well, hence why they're in girl groups and not solo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
Quote:
none of the 11 girls can sing all that well, hence why they're in girl groups and not solo
![]() How is she not a good singer? LOL |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,202
|
Quote:
Jade..
![]() How is she not a good singer? LOL I'm not saying she's a bad singer, she's just not particularly amazing or stand out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 542
|
Have always liked Girls aloud but think I preferred version 1 & 2 of the sugababes (only just though). Much prefer Girls aloud to versions 3+ of the sugababes. Both groups are good live but Girls aloud are more fun!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
Quote:
Well it's not strong enough for her to sustain a solo career
I'm not saying she's a bad singer, she's just not particularly amazing or stand out. 80% of solo artists in the UK have a weaker voice than Jade, I would even include Alexandra Burke in that category. To say Jade doesn't have a 'strong enough' voice is nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Up North.
Posts: 21,867
|
Currently, I don't like either.
Give me Sugababes v2.0/3.0 I would have said Sugababes. Never liked Girls Aloud, just found some of their songs irritatingly catchy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Up North.
Posts: 21,867
|
Quote:
Well it's not strong enough for her to sustain a solo career
I'm not saying she's a bad singer, she's just not particularly amazing or stand out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,202
|
Quote:
2 words. Cheryl Cole.
Only difference being she really is a bad singer |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Up North.
Posts: 21,867
|
Quote:
And almost the exact same thing goes for her.
Only difference being she really is a bad singer Great solo, just don't think she's a Sugababe. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:20.




