• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Results:What did you think of the episode?
Very Good
313 (33.44%)
Good
367 (39.21%)
Average
186 (19.87%)
Poor
49 (5.24%)
Very Poor
21 (2.24%)
Voters: 936. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
Doctor Who - Series 5/1/31 - Episode 2: The Beast Below - BBC One: 6:15PM
<<
<
35 of 35
>>
>
Grand Dizzy
17-04-2010
Originally Posted by TimCypher:
“Surely by the time you're 40 years old, your personality is pretty much set in stone?”

I wouldn’t agree with that. People’s personality can change drastically at any age.
brangdon
18-04-2010
Originally Posted by Grand Dizzy:
“People’s personality can change drastically at any age.”

Yes. But Liz's didn't. After 10 years she always ended up in the same place, making the same choice: to condemn the whale and save her people.

Originally Posted by TimCypher:
“In another response in this thread, someone directed me to a film (ironically called 'Cypher') which they said would help explain why Liz 10, now, was a genuinely different person.”

For it's worth, the episode actually took the opposite view. Amy was to be dumped despite her not remembering what she did wrong. That means she was still the same person. The situation with Liz (and everyone else) was analogous. That's why the Doctor got angry at the whole human race: their forgetting did not get them off the hook. This wasn't spelt out for Liz, but what happened with Amy was a microcosm of what happened with Liz and that ought to have been enough.

The reason the Doctor didn't punish Liz is that she'd helped to save her people, a choice the Doctor understood and validated. She had no choice. His own solution wasn't much different (and would have led to the Doctor hating himself, to the point where he changed his name).

Quote:
“What we need to understand 'Doctor Who' should be *IN* 'Doctor Who'. It should have been in there, explored and explained.”

Not all the time. Sometimes it's OK to raise intriguing questions and leave them for the audience to think about. Especially if there are clues in the episode.
BarrieT
27-04-2010
I don't know if this has been said already as only just watched this in Australia. I recorded it and on playback noticed it only lasted 40 minutes and not the usual 45. In confidential they showed the scene where Amy came out of the Tardis and Matt shouted "close the door". This was cut from the episode. I'm not sure if I enjoyed this ep or not. I certainly didn't dislike it, but it felt like there were some unanswered questions. It seemed like they were sending electric shocks to the whale to make it go faster so what was the point in feeding children to it? What was the point of the smilers? After 2 eps I can conclude that there is a lot of Doctor/Amy characterisation set-up going on with little substance to the stories. 7/10
tingramretro
27-04-2010
Originally Posted by BarrieT:
“ It seemed like they were sending electric shocks to the whale to make it go faster so what was the point in feeding children to it?”

Presumably, they were feeding it in order to keep it alive. After all, sending high voltage into the brain of a dead whale wouldn't make it go any faster...
JohnFlawbod
27-04-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“Presumably, they were feeding it in order to keep it alive. After all, sending high voltage into the brain of a dead whale wouldn't make it go any faster...”

Try telling that the Victor Frankenstein
tingramretro
27-04-2010
Originally Posted by JohnFlawbod:
“Try telling that the Victor Frankenstein ”

Ah, but Victor (An unfairly much maligned chap, I feel) was actually starting off with a corpse, which is a rather different situation. It would not have worked the same way had they allowed the whale to die, as they would not have been able to find a table big enough to strap it to while Hawthorne pulled the big levers and screamed 'it's aliiiive!'
lach doch mal
27-04-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“Ah, but Victor (An unfairly much maligned chap, I feel) was actually starting off with a corpse, which is a rather different situation. It would not have worked the same way had they allowed the whale to die, as they would not have been able to find a table big enough to strap it to while Hawthorne pulled the big levers and screamed 'it's aliiiive!'”

Ah but how do you know, maybe the table was strapped to the side of the whale that wasn't obvious to the viewer.

I wonder if they did experiments, where they fed the whale a 10 year old, 12 year old, 14 year old, and then 16 year old. Obviously the whale spat out everyone up to 15 years old. I'm quite serious here, though, at one point they must have done that to realise when to give people the option to decide on their future).
JohnFlawbod
27-04-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“Ah, but Victor (An unfairly much maligned chap, I feel) was actually starting off with a corpse, which is a rather different situation. It would not have worked the same way had they allowed the whale to die, as they would not have been able to find a table big enough to strap it to while Hawthorne pulled the big levers and screamed 'it's aliiiive!'”

Ooh, I want to see the whale equivalent of Elsa Lanchester in Series 6 (and no rudeness about the female form of present/past characters all you naughty people or there's a step to go to!)

Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“Ah but how do you know, maybe the table was strapped to the side of the whale that wasn't obvious to the viewer.

I wonder if they did experiments, where they fed the whale a 10 year old, 12 year old, 14 year old, and then 16 year old. Obviously the whale spat out everyone up to 15 years old. I'm quite serious here, though, at one point they must have done that to realise when to give people the option to decide on their future).”

"But Mr Smiler, I'm only 15"

"Wrong - it's 1 minute past midnight!"

"Oh bugger....Ahhhhhh"

lach doch mal
27-04-2010
Originally Posted by JohnFlawbod:
“


"But Mr Smiler, I'm only 15"

"Wrong - it's 1 minute past midnight!"

"Oh bugger....Ahhhhhh"

”

Very funny! I wonder if they carried out statistical analyses ** goes off to do some of that herself**
tingramretro
27-04-2010
Originally Posted by JohnFlawbod:
“Ooh, I want to see the whale equivalent of Elsa Lanchester in Series 6”

Well, Elsa herself had put on a bit of weight by the time of her last major film role, Murder by Death. Though 'whale' would be a bit unfair, I think.

I'm fairly certain that reanimating whales would be deemed to produce an unacceptably high carbon footprint. It would take a helluva lot more power than just one lightning strike.
brangdon
27-04-2010
Originally Posted by BarrieT:
“It seemed like they were sending electric shocks to the whale to make it go faster so what was the point in feeding children to it?”

They sent it all their organic rubbish. It makes sense that they would send it executed criminals because what else are they going to do, bury them? And given that, they might as well use the whale as a means of execution, too.

Quote:
“What was the point of the smilers?”

They monitored and manipulated the population.
Tremas
27-04-2010
hi,

Just been watching this again in HD on my iPad and I noticed something in the voting booth. I don't know if this has been discussed, but the voice over gives Amy's age as 1306 but the screen shows 1308, is this just an error?
<<
<
35 of 35
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map