|
||||||||
...so the Moffat backlash has begun. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the biscuit barrel...
Posts: 1,516
|
Quote:
As a Lost fan...
That's not sarcastic, even if it sounds it. It also applies to me and possibly others, but no-one else (including me) thought to cite it and give credence to our words, and your post is, of course, sound judgement. I kneel in your presence, Oh Great One... (ok, that's a bit sarcastic!)
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: City of London
Posts: 4,573
|
Quote:
If you read the OP you will see that I am defending Moffat and just raising the questions of whether there is a backlash at all, and from where it is originating.
Ego the size of a Star Whale......... |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 461
|
I always found myself disappointed with the direction the show took under RTD (especially his scripts which were awful) but I am loving the show so far under Moff! Based on his track record of previous stories and what I've seen so far, this is going to be a golden age for Nu Who!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
The creation of this thread and your original post demonstrates a level of hypocrisy I had hitherto suspected but not yet had confirmed as well as a complete lack of self-understanding...
...just watch and enjoy instead of attempting this bizarre conversion process flecked with bigotry and a fundamental misunderstanding of exactly what Doctor Who is and has always been about as a TV programme... ...you do know it's just a TV programme, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
I withdraw the comment, the FWIW paragraph was a bit swamped by the negative comments that you were quoting, and as I went through the following posts and read the quoting of your quotes, the context of them changed (in my head) to statements of your opinion.
I humbly apologise for my gross error and throw myself on the mercy of the court for my incorrect and totally outrageous misinterpretation ![]() No harm done! ![]() Just to show everyone why I was prompted to make this thread - here is a comment taken from the review thread talking about 'The Beast Below'.... Quote:
And I certainly don't recall an episode of the revived show that generated this level of confusion and, implicitly, dissatisfaction. I love television that makes me think and work out what is going on, don't get me wrong. DW is at its best (IMHO) when it works on different levels and SM has previously got the balance right. I'm not preaching all doom and gloom - for me, the jury remains out until the end of this series - but I did get a slight sense of deja vu in the show drifting back to the rather oblique stories of the late 80s that seemed to contain rather a lot of holes and made no concessions to mainstream viewers. That won't engage the wider audience, and the wider audience is what DW needs to survive. ![]() Strong stuff! |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
|
Quote:
Don't agree with that at all, both episodes so far have had much more to do with Amy than the Doctor.
This is just another example of SM being praised and RTD being criticised when in reality they're both doing exactly the same thing.... Quote:
No offence, but what a load of patronising claptrap
Quote:
I think Doctor Who has been full of plot holes for years! Remember Earthshock/Ressurrection Of The Daleks etc?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
The difference is, one of them's doing it rather better...
You disagree? After the number of posters moaning that they were 'confused' by a perfectly simple plot and repeatedly asking questions which were clearly answered on screen? Not aware of any connection between those two stories, or any plot holes in them... ![]() Tony, as a matter of interest do you think it is mainly the staunch RTD followers that are the most critical of the two most recent stories, or is there a general broad sense of discontent? |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,342
|
Quote:
Good points.
Tony, as a matter of interest do you think it is mainly the staunch RTD followers that are the most critical of the two most recent stories, or is there a general broad sense of discontent? The simple fact is a number of posters didn't love last nights episode as much as you clearly did, whether they are RTD fans or not is immaterial. What is your problem with that? |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
Quote:
The difference is, one of them's doing it rather better...
So what if some people are being critical of this episode in the episode thread? Thats what it is there for! There is no "backlash". None of the comments I have seen have been of a personal or unpleasant nature to SM (which is more than could be said about some of the homophobic abuse directed at RTD at times). IMHO the sole intent of this thread was to cause upset where none actually existed. I suppose in that sense it could be deemed a success. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
Why are you so insistent on bringing this back to 'RTD followers'.
The simple fact is a number of posters didn't love last nights episode as much as you clearly did, whether they are RTD fans or not is immaterial. What is your problem with that? If all the criticism is coming from one, highly vocal group, then we do not need to worry that the general fanbase has any real issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
Quote:
I am trying to establish if the discontent is originating from a particular group of fandom. No harm in that, is there?.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,342
|
Quote:
I am trying to establish if the discontent is originating from a particular group of fandom. No harm in that, is there?
If all the criticism is coming from one, highly vocal group, then we do not need to worry that the general fanbase has any real issues. So are you intimating that this 'discontent' (not that there is any, only valid criticism of last nights episode) is coming from disgruntled RTD fans unhappy that SM has taken over from their hero? |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
Your not trying to establish anything. Your OP and subsequent posts have made a number of sweeping statements. You then carried this in to another thread and made a personal attack on me based on this telling me I am part of "group 1", which is totally untrue.
I think you have been very even-handed and consistent in your praise for the latest 2 epsiodes and I do not consider you at all to be unreasonable or anti-SM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Downforce Radio
Posts: 9,226
|
Quote:
The point you fail to appreciate is that this is purely subjective. It's opinion not fact. I think we are lucky to have had two talented lead writers overseeing the show, and with a bit of luck SM will carry on the success we have seen in recent years.
I would like the opportunity to like or not like an episode without being put into a certain box that suits peoples agendas, thank you very much. I loved the first episode, the second one didn't work as well for me. What does that make me, an RTD apologist or a acolyte of Moffat? C'monnnn, the message of this show is to think independently, not be brainwashed to thinking what everyone else does because it is popular! Stop with the RTD vs Moffat wars and just enjoy the damn show!
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
So are you intimating that this 'discontent' (not that there is any, only valid criticism of last nights episode) is coming from disgruntled RTD fans unhappy that SM has taken over from their hero?
Is that, however, your take on it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,342
|
Quote:
I have not made a personal attack on you. When I made the gag (see the smiley - (not the one from the epsiode - the emoticon!)) I was making poking fun at my own thread, not you.
I think you have been very even-handed and consistent in your praise for the latest 2 epsiodes and I do not consider you at all to be anti-SM. ![]() By anti-SM I'm assuming you're including anyone who has criticised any aspect of the first two episodes of this series, or is it anyone who hasn't been consistent in their praise? |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
Stop with the RTD vs Moffat wars and just enjoy the damn show! ![]() ![]() And I am really enjoying the show, btw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: City of London
Posts: 4,573
|
Quote:
I always found myself disappointed with the direction the show took under RTD (especially his scripts which were awful) but I am loving the show so far under Moff! Based on his track record of previous stories and what I've seen so far, this is going to be a golden age for Nu Who!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,342
|
Quote:
No, that's what I am trying to see. Is there a pattern?
Is that, however, your take on it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
I don't have a take on it, I'm simply trying to see where you're coming from on this (and failing badly).....
![]() I have had a couple of reads thru the long review thread. Over 40 pages - so it takes some reading. I tried to correlate the very critical posts to see if there was a general feeling of discontent about the direction of Dr Who. It 'appears' that there is some friction between the strong, vocal group of staunch RTD followers and those who are now lavishly heaping praise on Moffat and his tenure. I discerned two groups (which I alluded to in an earlier post) of strong critics. I am just trying to figure out if the strong criticism is coming from just a small sub-section of fandom - ie the RTD followers who wish he was still in charge. Is there some resentment that Moffat is now in charge? Could there be some jealousy that the new guy is getting all the plaudits? Could there be ulterior motives in some of the criticisms? I am not trying to upset the applecart here, but I am just raising the questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 602
|
Quote:
No, that's what I am trying to see. Is there a pattern?
Is that, however, your take on it? I've been a DW fan from 72, I can't understand the need to heap praise on one writer at the expense of another. There have been loads of writers on DW so why the need to hype Moffat all the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: City of London
Posts: 4,573
|
Quote:
Ok, sorry. I shall try to be more clear.
![]() I have had a couple of reads thru the long review thread. Over 40 pages - so it takes some reading. I tried to correlate the very critical posts to see if there was a general feeling of discontent about the direction of Dr Who. It 'appears' that there is some friction between the strong, vocal group of staunch RTD followers and those who are now lavishly heaping praise on Moffat and his tenure. I discerned two groups (which I alluded to in an earlier post) of strong critics. I am just trying to figure out if the strong criticism is coming from just a small sub-section of fandom - ie the RTD followers who wish he was still in charge. Is there some resentment that Moffat is now in charge? Could there be some jealousy that the new guy is getting all the plaudits? Could there be ulterior motives in some of the criticisms? I am not trying to upset the applecart here, but I am just raising the questions. ![]() Along the way you have used bigotry and "isms" to denegrate others and have achieved virtually nothing of substance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,155
|
Quote:
No, poppycock, what you are doing for reasons presumably based in your own mind is create friction where none exists and refusing to allow others the right to like or dislike an episode which is written by your self-proclaimed deity.
Along the way you have used bigotry and "isms" to denegrate others and have achieved virtually nothing of substance. ![]() Bigotry? -isms? ![]() Everyone has the right to their own opinions. I myself have been critical of a few episodes in the past. I respect the right for all people to hold and share their own personal views, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,342
|
Quote:
Please stop with the personal stuff.
![]() Bigotry? -isms? ![]() Everyone has the right to their own opinions. I myself have been critical of a few episodes in the past. I respect the right for all people to hold and share their own personal views, of course. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: City of London
Posts: 4,573
|
Quote:
Please stop with the personal stuff.
![]() Bigotry? -isms? ![]() Everyone has the right to their own opinions. I myself have been critical of a few episodes in the past. I respect the right for all people to hold and share their own personal views, of course. ![]() ...if everyone is entitled to their own opinions - what drove you to start this thread because surely, if people have issues with SM episodes, that is just their opinion and no kind of backlash at all. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:05.






