DS Forums

 
 

...so the Moffat backlash has begun.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-04-2010, 00:03
cunningham1471
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 7,314
Don't agree with that at all, both episodes so far have had much more to do with Amy than the Doctor.

This is just another example of SM being praised and RTD being criticised when in reality they're both doing exactly the same thing....
I'm not criticising RTD. I like about 95% of his stuff. I don't take the series that seriously that I go into he is better then him. Each producer has good things as well as bad things about their work. s does every Director and every actor. McCoy in his first season mostly really bad. McCoy in his last season significantly better once he became more serious and darker.

The point I was making about The Doctor being more in the forefront was in relation to the first episode of the series
As I previously metioned. In DT's first proper episode he spent a lot of it off screen in bed. You saw more of Rose, Jackie, Mickey etc than the Doctor. Not good when it is that actor's first story and he should be trying to establish himself as The New Doctor.

Jump back to CE's first story. You first meet The Doctor when he opens a door and sticks his head out of it. After running about and a few scenes he again drops out the story and it's about Rose and Mickey. You meet Jackie. Rose goes off to seed the person that posted the advert in the paper about The Doctor. Mickey stays outside until he end up eaten by a wheelie bin. It takes a while before CE is back in the story when they are near the Millenium Wheel in London for the big final scenes.

Now compare that to MS's first story. From him hanging out of the door of the TARDIS, to meeting the young Amy to meeting grown up Amy, to the village stuff to the hospital stuff. He was almost an ever present in that episode.
This was putting The Doctor back in the forefront of the show or to be more accurate that story.
Yes the story was about Amy, the passing of time, her waiting for him to return etc, but you can't deny compared to EC and DT, it's MS that got the better deal in screentime and being the focus of the story out of the three of them.

On that topic I would say SM scores the points over RTD. SM:1 RTD: 0

If you wanted to go opening monsters in those stories. The Autons and The Sycorax completely beat Prisoner whatever number it was. So equalising point to RTD. SM: 1 RTD: 1
cunningham1471 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 12-04-2010, 00:07
BibaNova
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 602
I'm a big fan of Mark Gatiss, love LOG, got his books and seen him at Drury Lane. I can't wait till next weeks episode. If I think it's not great I will say so doesn't mean I got an agenda against him.
BibaNova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 00:16
codename_47
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Downforce Radio
Posts: 9,226
I'm not criticising RTD. I like about 95% of his stuff. I don't take the series that seriously that I go into he is better then him. Each producer has good things as well as bad things about their work. s does every Director and every actor. McCoy in his first season mostly really bad. McCoy in his last season significantly better once he became more serious and darker.

The point I was making about The Doctor being more in the forefront was in relation to the first episode of the series
As I previously metioned. In DT's first proper episode he spent a lot of it off screen in bed. You saw more of Rose, Jackie, Mickey etc than the Doctor. Not good when it is that actor's first story and he should be trying to establish himself as The New Doctor.

Jump back to CE's first story. You first meet The Doctor when he opens a door and sticks his head out of it. After running about and a few scenes he again drops out the story and it's about Rose and Mickey. You meet Jackie. Rose goes off to seed the person that posted the advert in the paper about The Doctor. Mickey stays outside until he end up eaten by a wheelie bin. It takes a while before CE is back in the story when they are near the Millenium Wheel in London for the big final scenes.

Now compare that to MS's first story. From him hanging out of the door of the TARDIS, to meeting the young Amy to meeting grown up Amy, to the village stuff to the hospital stuff. He was almost an ever present in that episode.
This was putting The Doctor back in the forefront of the show or to be more accurate that story.
Yes the story was about Amy, the passing of time, her waiting for him to return etc, but you can't deny compared to EC and DT, it's MS that got the better deal in screentime and being the focus of the story out of the three of them.

On that topic I would say SM scores the points over RTD. SM:1 RTD: 0

If you wanted to go opening monsters in those stories. The Autons and The Sycorax completely beat Prisoner whatever number it was. So equalising point to RTD. SM: 1 RTD: 1
In those stories though, Rose represents the viewer, the new viewer who the series was re-establishing itself to...

You see the Doctor through Rose's eyes and become as amazing and astonished by his greatness as she does.

Through Rose's mundane life we are shown the better way of life of the Doctor and that we all want to be a part of it...

That's how you introduce the new series to a new audience, and it was quite similar with Amy becoming devoted to the Doctor's lore from the age of 9 to the point of being obsessed by it and wishing the raggedy Doctor to return.

And its really lame in the extreme to start keeping score so please drop that immediately!
codename_47 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 00:28
cunningham1471
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 7,314
In those stories though, Rose represents the viewer, the new viewer who the series was re-establishing itself to...

You see the Doctor through Rose's eyes and become as amazing and astonished by his greatness as she does.

Through Rose's mundane life we are shown the better way of life of the Doctor and that we all want to be a part of it...

That's how you introduce the new series to a new audience, and it was quite similar with Amy becoming devoted to the Doctor's lore from the age of 9 to the point of being obsessed by it and wishing the raggedy Doctor to return.

And its really lame in the extreme to start keeping score so please drop that immediately!
I understand that you was seeing The Doctor through Rose's eyes, but that works better if she is actually around him to observe him a bit more.
I'm not convinced to the new viewer that really worked and that episode wasn't a success more because of all the media coverage leading up to it built upon it was soemthing a bit different from what was being shown on a Saturday night in that time slot for the last few years.
IMO it was the same with Primeval. You suddenly had dinosaurs on a Saturday tea time. Cool!
It caught the imagination.

I notice you didn't mention DT's first story.
I've not timed it but it would be intersting to find out excluding scenes when he is asleep in bed, how many minutes DT is in that story. I would guess bout 15-20 minutes?

You are right about the scoring and I will gladly drop it.
I only did it as I was accused of being biased towards SM. So I was showing that I'm not. I am able to look at the series or episodes and see things that one of them did better than the other from both perspectives.
cunningham1471 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 00:39
sheff71
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,456
The difference is, one of them's doing it rather better...
Thing is though, those who feel the need to lavish praise on SM are comparing a handful of his stories over a long time against RTD's much heavier involvement and amount of scripts. When SM has had a couple of years in charge and had far more scripts scrutinised by the GBP, see then if he's still able to produce classic episodes on a regular basis.

Though why it should matter who's in charge, as long as they're doing their best to provide entertaining weekend tv, is beyond me - just enjoy it for what it is, a fictional tv show!

Glad to see the two new leads settling in nicely so far!
sheff71 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 00:47
cunningham1471
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 7,314
Thing is though, those who feel the need to lavish praise on SM are comparing a handful of his stories over a long time against RTD's much heavier involvement and amount of scripts. When SM has had a couple of years in charge and had far more scripts scrutinised by the GBP, see then if he's still able to produce classic episodes on a regular basis.

Though why it should matter who's in charge, as long as they're doing their best to provide entertaining weekend tv, is beyond me - just enjoy it for what it is, a fictional tv show!

Glad to see the two new leads settling in nicely so far!
Absolutely. I totally agree with you.

It is fun comparing episodes for the sake of discussion though. It's just a shame some people get so wound up about it.

As well as these different faces we need one of Michael Winner with the line. "Calm down dear, it's only a TV show!"
cunningham1471 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 06:45
Leper Messiah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 120
Good lord, how do people who are clearly fans of the show get such little pleasure out of discussing it with other fans?
Leper Messiah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:19
CAMERA OBSCURA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,692
Good lord, how do people who are clearly fans of the show get such little pleasure out of discussing it with other fans?
For fans of the show it has been virtually impossible to discuss it for as long as I've been coming here, in fact except for a few recent posts, I all but stopped posting in here. Why? because it became impossible to actually talk about the show with other fans that also enjoy it without the same few loud mouth know it all classic who fans jumping into any thread that even remotely praised the show, or any post that even remotely praised a writer or episode.

If these chosen few, these Who experts don't agree then bloody hell be prepared to hear about it time and time and time again. And as is the nature with internet forums those threads then turn into fans of the show defending it, all discussion about enjoying the show goes out of the window because if the few don't like it it simply inst allowed for others to like and discuss it for to long. Thankfully with the two new Moffat episodes so far these have clearly shown the few posters up for the hypocrites they have been for the last few years, what ever DS name they have been using from their multiple accounts, Im pretty sure one actually has discussions with himself using 2 DS names.

In the Beast Below thread I deliberately nitpicked the episode to a ridiculous extent, quite irritating isn't it when some just bangs on and on about the tiniest thing. Now imagine that for virtually every episode since the show came back by the same few posters and you'll be nearer the truth as to why people who are clearly fans of the show get such little pleasure out of discussing it with other fans. But now it appears that all the things these bastions of classic Who criticised over the last few years have suddenly become acceptable intelligent sci-fi , it is pretty laughable, are we supposed to take these people seriously?

CAMERA OBSCURA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:50
The_abbott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,566
I wouldn't call it a backlash, people are simply voicing their opinion of what they've seen so far.

There's a long way to go in this series and opinions can change, but personally speaking I found last night's episode disappointing after a very decent opener last week.

Being a show runner is vastly different to writing the odd episode here and there, and I think people's expectations of SM are very high based on what he's written so far for Dr Who, but IMO these first two episodes are way below the standard of his previous efforts.

I'm certainly not sold yet on Amy Pond, can't quite put my finger on it but there's something not gelling with me, but again there's 11 more episodes to go and she may well grow on me.

Matt has made a good start IMO but still needs to improve, which I'm sure he will.
Agree with everything you said. However, at least they are making me watch teh entire episodes so far. Tennant and Davies had me nodding off towards the end of their tenure
The_abbott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 10:15
Adam Kelleher
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,433
Not aware of any connection between those two stories, or any plot holes in them...
Have you actually watched "Resurection"??? If so, if you don't think there are any plot holes, perhaps you would be kind enough to explain what's going on to the rest of us.
Adam Kelleher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 10:24
Adam Kelleher
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,433
This was putting The Doctor back in the forefront of the show or to be more accurate that story.
Yes the story was about Amy, the passing of time, her waiting for him to return etc, but you can't deny compared to EC and DT, it's MS that got the better deal in screentime and being the focus of the story out of the three of them.

On that topic I would say SM scores the points over RTD. SM:1 RTD: 0


What's so important about that? Go back to "An Unearthly Child" and compare the screentime of the Doctor versus his companions. The show's called "Doctor Who" and The Doctor is the linking feature. Doesn't mean he has to be at the forefront all the time.
Adam Kelleher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 10:37
McSpanky
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 531
Three noticable differences for me:

The stories seem more thoughtful, and perhaps require concentration rather than simple "flash-bang" action of old.

Sometimes there has been NO BACKGROUND MUSIC... Shock, horror!!! [!] A real plus for me... and NO AIMLESS RUNNING AROUND!!!

Matt Smith is a great Doctor, and Karen Gillan a brilliant companion

PS: I give no thought as to who is producing the show... (sometimes I will check to see who the director was, if a show is particularly noteworthy) - why should I? As long as it continues to be this entertaining I will watch it no matter who is "in charge"
McSpanky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 10:42
pongobilly
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 64
i think this series has been a good start but there is room for improvement which i think we will get as the series goes on, after all we wouldnt be getting series 6 confirmed this early if the bbc thought it wasnt gonna be worthwhile
pongobilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 10:46
franster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London
Posts: 3,734
It doesn't feel like a backlash to me. It feels like people are a little let down by the second episode that's all. Maybe it's because the opening episode was so fantastic.
I agree with this. Well, I agree that this is the problem people have.

I really liked the episode though, in no way is it the worst nu_who story imo. I think it was actually a bit too transparent (which is ironic given that so many people think it was confusing lol.)
franster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 10:57
Adam Law
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London, England, UK
Posts: 1,682
The worst 2 "Nu-Who" stories by far were the appalling episodes 2.11 and 2.12.

I can't remember the names but 2.11 was the one written by Peter Kay which was "Dr Lite" and featured the awful sex implication of Bridget and Elton having a "love life" after she been turned to a face in a paving slab.

2.12 was the God awful episode of the London Olympics where the little girl drew pictures of people and imprisoned them.

The beast below is poetry compared to those abominations.

Awful.
Adam Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 11:05
chuffnobbler
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9,542
I loved Love & Monsters and Fear Her!

The two episodes of SM's series have been quite ordinary, Very watchable, but very minor. I think a lot of people were expecting SM's scripts to be of the quality of his previous ones; however, they overlook he has written 6 scripts in 4yrs, and is doing at least the same number this year alone PLUS executively producing.

The 2 so far have been nice, watchable, ordinary, meat-and-potatoes DW, and I think fans expected SM to deliver a Blink every week.

As for his showrunningness ... fine so far. Excellent Doctor and companion. Nice repositioning of the Earth based stuff out of London. New monsters. No snot-n-tears. The music was better than ever, this week. Nice fairytale atmosphere to some bits of last week's. No complaints in the Chuff household.
chuffnobbler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 11:14
tingramretro
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
Good points.

Tony, as a matter of interest do you think it is mainly the staunch RTD followers that are the most critical of the two most recent stories, or is there a general broad sense of discontent?
I don't think there's a broad sense of discontent at all-overall, the reaction to the new setup seems to have been overwhelmingly positive except from a comparative handful of individuals who just don't seem to get it. I don't think that's because they're biased against one writer or resenting the departure of another, I just think Moffat is writing for a more sci-fi literate audience and requiring the viewer to pay closer attention to the details of the plot than Davies, who was possibly writing for a more general audience. Moffaat is expecting the audience to do some of the work, that's all. I personally think this approach works far better, but I'd guess that some of the more casual viewers who don't follow the plot that closely because they're just looking for a bit of light early evening entertainment will be dissatisfied and switch off. That's their loss, though.

Have you actually watched "Resurection"??? If so, if you don't think there are any plot holes, perhaps you would be kind enough to explain what's going on to the rest of us.
If you tell me what it was you didn't understand, I'll be happy to give it a shot.

The truth appears to be poppycock, that you and your mate "Tony" both delight in stirring up discontent by perpetuating this falacy that there exists a rift between RTD and SM fans whereas this rift exists purely in your own minds
Excuse me, I haven't suggested anything of the kind. I defy you to find anywhere that I have. And why do you keep putting my name in quotes? I'd really like to know what you're implying.
tingramretro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 12:16
BibaNova
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 602
Love & Monsters must be up there with the Bernie Basset episode as the worst. Love & Monsters had a great cast completely wasted on a dire plot. I don't mind Fear Her though.

The Beast Below was okay, at one point I did get confused but my 7 year old told me what was happening!
BibaNova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 12:31
tommy tuttle
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london
Posts: 132
People use the term plot hole for everything now ¬¬ If it's not explained to you in every single detail, then it's a plothole. If it is, and they're not paying attention (such as with people and this episode), then it's a plothole
are these the same people who complain when a series has a sign posted plot and moan that they are being treated like idiots by the writer
tommy tuttle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 12:35
tingramretro
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
are these the same people who complain when a series has a sign posted plot and moan that they are being treated like idiots by the writer
Generally, yes.
tingramretro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 12:38
reeley
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 345
Good grief. Look, a simple suggestion.

Sit back, watch Dr Who, enjoy (or not) and then flip over to three and watch confidential, again, enjoy (or not)

It is just a TV Light Entertainment/drama programme (one I have enjoyed since 1963) and not just another bloody reality show!
reeley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 12:42
Adam Kelleher
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,433

If you tell me what it was you didn't understand, I'll be happy to give it a shot.

.
Haven't watched it for a while, so can't be specific, but basically the whole premise of the duplicates and the proposed invasion of Gallifrey didn't make a lot of sense and didn't seem to hang together. And Lytton turning out to be a goodie! (Although, to be fair, that's not "Resurrection"'s fault, but "Attack of the Cybermen")
Adam Kelleher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 12:48
Adam Kelleher
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,433
I loved Love & Monsters and Fear Her!
I loved Love & Monsters too and have never understood the vitriol against it. Seems to be if the Doctor isn't the star of the show then it's not worth watching for some people (although I guess Blink disproves that theory to some extent!). I especially liked the way we saw events that had already happened in other episodes from an ordinary person's point of view.

As for Fear Her, it just seemed average at the time, I haven't watched it since, but surprised it came in the bottom 10 of DWMs 200 poll.
Adam Kelleher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 12:53
leosw4
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,667
I always thought it was John Nathan-Turner that was crazy but as the years have progressed I'm pretty sure it is the fans

Loved 'The Beast Below' but there was always going to be some kind of backlash. For me the hour long specials of last year were appalling and this series has been a return to form
Blimey and here is me thinking i was alone in the Universe thinking these exact things.

Thank you.
leosw4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 13:22
tingramretro
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
Haven't watched it for a while, so can't be specific, but basically the whole premise of the duplicates and the proposed invasion of Gallifrey didn't make a lot of sense and didn't seem to hang together. And Lytton turning out to be a goodie! (Although, to be fair, that's not "Resurrection"'s fault, but "Attack of the Cybermen")
Lytton wasn't a 'goodie', he was simply a mercenary who'd ended up working for the Daleks against his will (since no-one in their right mind would work for them willingly). As for the idea of infiltrating Gallifrey with duplicates of the Doctor and his companions, I thought that was quirte a clever idea, though sadly undeveloped.
tingramretro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:05.