Quote:
“Muttley76
Well yes they do, but it's not really relevant to what this OP is trying to say here. The fact that overall people might have liked the STORIES better does not mean that the reaction to DT wasn't very mixed at the time, which is what the OP was saying.”
Yes, I understand that, I wasn’t using the polls as a basis of MS popularity but as how the voters here perceived the series with a new Doctor as the series progressed using the op’s first three episodes example. I was expanding the 3 episode idea of this thread and not using it as a basis of MS popularity.
Quote:
“Muttley76
I also have to say trying to compare the results of the polls then and now is highly flawed because we have six options in one set of polls and five in another. Thereby meaning it is impossible to make a fair judgement either way, because we don't know how the addition or subtraction of one of the options would effect the outcome of the poll, nor is it possible to predict what it would be.
Your trying to compare two totally different sets of responses”
Which is why I said it is probably a safe bet to read the 'very good 'vote as excellent (I recall a few complaints that there was no excellent option at the time, so would it not be safe to assume that very good were the excellent vote that was not avaliable for those polls) and the only other readings I compared were the poor very poor votes as they appear on both style of polls.
Again this wasnt used as a measurment of MS's popualrity but in context of the 3 episode ethos I thought it would be interesting to compare the polls, its a simple as that. Im sorry you disagree but there you go.
Quote:
“NewbieCanuck
I don't really think we can make a valid comparison with School Reunion to other 3rd episodes. It brought back Sarah Jane and K-9 and had Anthony head and did it with so much heart that people who'd never seen Sarah Jane or K-9 were in tears. And just to cap it off, a student gets to blow up his high school.
Imagine the polling you'd get if they brought back Rose for the first time after 30 years instead of 30 months.”
And there will have been many viewers not aware of who Sarah Smith was, not every new who viewer is steeped in classic who. Were the excellent votes because of who was in the episode or because of the story and how well it handled and portrayed its emotional dynamics? TVoD had new Daleks , Churchill and spitfires in it all of those are far more exciting for me that an old companion returning, so by rights I should have voted excellent for that episode because I like Daleks, Churchill and spitfires, I don’t think it works like that. (although I did love the spitfires in space

)
I dont think people vote excellent based on who is in an episode to be honest.
If the SJS story was an absolute stinker, if the new who audience hadn’t had connected with her character, if that emotional context hadn’t had worked as well as it did, well then I dare say it would not have received that many votes just based on having SJS in it, she would have been just another character to many new who viewers, but the writing had heart and dynamics in its characterisation, something that has been drastically missing from the last two episodes of the new series.
For example Churchill was a wasted opportunity in VOTD imo, the passion the story should have demanded just by having that character in it was completely over looked.
Now, again, I didn’t use those polls as a measurement of MS popularity, I’ve said that a new Doctor should be given chance to bed in, and this wasn’t about MS but in the context of the first 3 episode ethos of the thread I thought it would be interesting to see how both series progressed in terms of storys based on the voter in these forums, and to show that the high votes for the eleventh hour disputes the anti SM/MS tosh being raised (not by the OP I might add)