Seriously, you may not like it. Fine. It may not be to your taste. Fine. But don't state your opinions on the quality of modern music as fact. Music is subjective, you can't cateogorize ''good'' and ''bad'' music.
If we went by certain people's perceptions of music in the past you'd think music then was Beethoven like fgs.
And when did the charts represent the quality of music we listen to? ''The charts is littered with so and so'' ''the charts is full of rubbish etc etc etc''. The charts are a measurement of popularity, not quality. So why do people expect what they consider to be ''good music'' to be in the charts?
The chart makes up a largerly young demographic i.e teenagers, so they will buy whatever is marketed to them.
People forget when you are teenager your tastes are changing every day as you are just discovering what you like/dislike musically.
Don't mock teenagers for there taste in music - mock the radio stations who limit what type of music they are exposed to.
Also, if people try to find music they actually like instead of expecting it to be handed to them on a plate then maybe they'd discover the real gems of today's music which may not be in the charts due to lack of promotion/airplay but is very good.
People from a older decade should not expect the charts to have music which will appeal to them, because music is not aimed at people over 25. Teenagers are seen as the money generators, so therefore is it unlikely someone over 25 will like it. Although my mum who is in her 40s is very open minded and actually doesn't spend her time just slagging off everything after 2003.
Just like people who apperciate music in eras such as the sixties would like people to seek out that music and apperciate instead of seeing it as ''old stuff'' is the same way I feel about the music of today. Because it simply more than the Top 40 and we ought to be more postitive and apperciate and speard the word about the music we do love, instead of spending 60% of the time slagging something off.
No doubt someone will get offended and attack me, but hey it's a free world.
If we went by certain people's perceptions of music in the past you'd think music then was Beethoven like fgs.
And when did the charts represent the quality of music we listen to? ''The charts is littered with so and so'' ''the charts is full of rubbish etc etc etc''. The charts are a measurement of popularity, not quality. So why do people expect what they consider to be ''good music'' to be in the charts?
The chart makes up a largerly young demographic i.e teenagers, so they will buy whatever is marketed to them.
People forget when you are teenager your tastes are changing every day as you are just discovering what you like/dislike musically.
Don't mock teenagers for there taste in music - mock the radio stations who limit what type of music they are exposed to.
Also, if people try to find music they actually like instead of expecting it to be handed to them on a plate then maybe they'd discover the real gems of today's music which may not be in the charts due to lack of promotion/airplay but is very good.
People from a older decade should not expect the charts to have music which will appeal to them, because music is not aimed at people over 25. Teenagers are seen as the money generators, so therefore is it unlikely someone over 25 will like it. Although my mum who is in her 40s is very open minded and actually doesn't spend her time just slagging off everything after 2003.
Just like people who apperciate music in eras such as the sixties would like people to seek out that music and apperciate instead of seeing it as ''old stuff'' is the same way I feel about the music of today. Because it simply more than the Top 40 and we ought to be more postitive and apperciate and speard the word about the music we do love, instead of spending 60% of the time slagging something off.
No doubt someone will get offended and attack me, but hey it's a free world.




I hope you don't get bashed too harshly! Good luck.
