|
||||||||
Terry Pratchett criticises Doctor Who, accuses it of makeitupasyougoalongeum |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Fair enough he can state what he feels.
but had to laugh when he says 'I will still watch it' I didnt like the specials last year I knew then it was time for DT to leave because it was hurting the show. Ive seen nothing wrong with the Series and the mere fact its holding Audience figures well says it all. Just look at The Prisoner on ITV (clear the audience telling the channel its Crap) |
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 512
|
Real cognitive dissonance going on in my mind! I love both Terry Pratchett and Doctor Who. To be fair, I think he's right on some counts, I just don't always consider it a problem. And he's occasionally guilty of deus ex machina too.
And I disagree with makeitupasyougoalongeum being used all the time. For example, the use of gravity as a solution was clearly signposted in Flesh and Stone, and worked brilliantly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 399
|
@sigsig
My favourite phrase cognative dissonance. sums up at lot of post on these forums |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,060
|
That will have been written before Pratchett even saw series 5, so his views on the RTD 'Who' are spot on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
I'd have agreed with him if he was talking about last year, but not this year. Bit baffled by his comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
@sigsig
My favourite phrase cognative dissonance. sums up at lot of post on these forums
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 16
|
So what if Doctor Who uses deus ex machina or "makeitupasyougoalongeum" ???
Surely all that matters is how entertaining the stories are? War of the Worlds uses arguably one of the biggest deus ex machinas of ALL TIME but it's still a brilliant story. Judge each story/episode on its own merits I say. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
So what if Doctor Who uses deus ex machina or "makeitupasyougoalongeum" ???
Surely all that matters is how entertaining the stories are? War of the Worlds uses arguably one of the biggest deus ex machinas of ALL TIME but it's still a brilliant story. Judge each story/episode on its own merits I say. For characters to be believeable they have to be consistent. If their world is inconsistent then this is difficult. Over time if people are finding characters unbelieveable then they will lose identification and switch off. Of course, if you can pull in a less discerning audience then you may keep ratings, but there are only so many times you can use that device before it becomes predictable and no one watches any more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
|
Quote:
Jon Pertwee did seem to spend a lot of time on Earth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South West London
Posts: 2,459
|
Quote:
So what if Doctor Who uses deus ex machina or "makeitupasyougoalongeum" ???
Surely all that matters is how entertaining the stories are? War of the Worlds uses arguably one of the biggest deus ex machinas of ALL TIME but it's still a brilliant story. Judge each story/episode on its own merits I say. Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry Pratchett
And yet, I will watch again next week because it is pure professionally-written entertainment, even if it helps sometimes if you leave your brain on a hook by the door. It’s funny, light-hearted, knows when to use pathos and capable of wonderful moments
Posted early in the thread but worth a repost: http://www.sfx.co.uk/2010/05/03/gues...on-doctor-who/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
|
Quote:
I don't know why DS are making a mountain out of this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,894
|
Well I like Pratchett and I like Dr Who - not sure I want to see a fight between them to sort it out. And once you get through the DS spin there isn't much of an issue between them anyway.
Both are mostly great fun but not always - Monstrous Regiment and Love & Monsters don't spoil the good stuff though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
Well I like Pratchett and I like Dr Who - not sure I want to see a fight between them to sort it out. And once you get through the DS spin there isn't much of an issue between them anyway.
Both are mostly great fun but not always - Monstrous Regiment and Love & Monsters don't spoil the good stuff though. I really enjoyed Monstrous Regiment!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,445
|
You can critique a programme and still love it, and I must admit that DW's and especially TW's "giant reset button" moments annoyed me.
Basically felt that the writers backed themselves into a corner and then had to wave a magic wand to fix it. It leaves me feeling a bit short changed tbh. Not all the time, just sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,189
|
i agree with what terry pratchett has said, because its true!! but im assuming its all supposed to be changing this series? no more silly endings...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leicester
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
I implore anybody to read the "full" article - he doesn't criticise DW or call it ludicrous in so many words - in fact he quite enjoys the ludicrous bits. HE is still a fan - he enjoys it.
I don't know why DS are making a mountain out of this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London
Posts: 781
|
Hes right, but Doctor Who is basically a kids show, not designed to make sense at all, very clunky plots, etc, just meant to be fun. Its a kids show, just one that loads of adults happen to watch too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
|
Quote:
I'd agree with him too, especially with regards to the RTD era. Moffat doesn't seem to have the "where did that come from??" ending so much (so far), and the Doctor portrayed as vulnerable, where he wasn't before.
The thing to keep in mind, here folks, and most people have, is that TP offered constructive criticism, criticism from the second best selling British author, he didn't outright say "it was rubbish, I hate it," he said something different. And he still said he'd watch it. So you can't berate him for that ![]() We had the virus and then Amy coming up with solution based on feelings in bothe the Beast Below, and Victory, and then in the two parter , lucky the crack took more prominance....so not just an RTD thing As for the Doctor's vunerability....I have yet to see Moff make the Doctor as vunerable as he was in Midnight, and heck even when he took on the Time Lord victoriuos persona, he was still very vunerable....hence the result of his actions....in Moffs stories he is a hero, almost fairytale like, the ones that monsters have nightmares about, the ones that he tells to run away and they do, the ones he smugly tells that they shouldn't put in a trap....I don't see how any of that is any more vunerable than what RTD did with the Doctor.... Quote:
You can imagine him shaking his head in disbelief at 'The Last of the Time Lords' because this is the kind of desperately poor Who he's on about here. Even the 'Tinkerbell' thing, ('cause that's who the Doctor resembles floating through the air!), the Doctor being this crazy godlike figure. That episode is probably the most disasterous in new Who and yet it STILL has good points about it, notably John Simm's performance as the Master and Murray Gold's brilliant Gallifrey music. So even the worst episodes are still watchable (just...).
However, anyone who's read Discworld books knows Terry is no stranger to Deus ex Machina-style resolutions so he doesn't have any right to rip off any other writers for using them! He is a brilliant writer, of course, but this sort of situation is often unavoidable. Writing yourself into a corner and then e.g....oh who would have thought this book also contained the right info to help me out of this cell...etc. that sort of thing. It can't be helped. I don't believe you can put RTD's so called DEM's in the same category as being stuck in a corner....manily because he already has the solution planned....whether that be to have the Doctor saved by Rose so he then can save her, or for Rose to be sent through the parallel world, or the Doctor to become dobby and then come back in a big fashion using physic link, or creating another Doctor using his spare hand, or making Donna save the world from the Daleks only for her to lose her memory just because of that.... Quote:
Fair enough he can state what he feels.
but had to laugh when he says 'I will still watch it' I didnt like the specials last year I knew then it was time for DT to leave because it was hurting the show. Ive seen nothing wrong with the Series and the mere fact its holding Audience figures well says it all. Just look at The Prisoner on ITV (clear the audience telling the channel its Crap) How did you not liking the specials mean that DT was hurting the show? Considering that ratings wise the specials didn't do that badly....Quote:
That will have been written before Pratchett even saw series 5, so his views on the RTD 'Who' are spot on.
So your saying that he would have thought about the way love saved them all from the Bracewell Bomb as being perfect Sci-fi??? Okay then..... Quote:
I'd agree that the last few seasons were a bit guilty of what he's saying, but it's been great so far this year, the Doctors more of a mad professor this time around which is great, i wan't less epic doctor stuff, he's not the messiah, he's a very naughty timelord.
![]() As pointed above, the so called solutions so far are questionable as much as any so called RTD DEM was...and the Doctor hasn't completely lost his so called messiah/epic ego if the way he got rid of the Atraxi is anything to go by.... Quote:
That depends on the intention. To commission a new series you need ratings, not quality - see Graham Norton.
For characters to be believeable they have to be consistent. If their world is inconsistent then this is difficult. Over time if people are finding characters unbelieveable then they will lose identification and switch off. Of course, if you can pull in a less discerning audience then you may keep ratings, but there are only so many times you can use that device before it becomes predictable and no one watches any more. Not sure what you mean by this....I mean what same device was used again and again in RTD stories that were a solution to the plots each time that then got tiring? Quote:
I really enjoyed Monstrous Regiment!And I love Love and Monsters!!! ![]() Quote:
i agree with what terry pratchett has said, because its true!! but im assuming its all supposed to be changing this series? no more silly endings...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 752
|
Leave him alone...Terry Pratchett has a good thing going...
Respect the thing....it's a thing in progress... D |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Airdrie, North Lanarkshire
Posts: 1,232
|
who cares what TP thinks anyway? its only one guys (not even fully quoted) opinion.
if you like the show, watch it. if you dont like it then dont watch it. its that simple!! what amazes me is posts about loving the show then pointing out what they think are the weaker worst episodes!! why do we do that as a society? we focus on what we think are negatives rather than the positives. i love watching Dr Who, for me its 45 minutes of escapism watching a FANTASY show. when i want to stretch my brain or find out about quantum locking i'd watch the discovery channel or go to uni to learn about it! not everyone has the same opinions as everyone else so just worry about your own |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here at university
Posts: 656
|
Quote:
Argh more pointless social psychology students go away
![]() (says the Psychology student)As to Pratchett's comments, I would have to agree on some bits (Last Of The Time Lords springs to mind). |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,114
|
hahaha! he's right in some ways!
i do enjoy Dr Who very much. but what ever peril he is in or will ever be in - it will be solved immediately by something made up there and then. and the sonic screw driver is now some kind of magic wand that solves and does everything. I still enjoy it though. going to pick up the first DVD of this series for a friend's kid in NZ. pity the Kiwis, they wont be able to see this series till next year! |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
|
Quote:
Argh more pointless social psychology students go away
![]() anyway...isnt it revison time????????????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 81
|
Mr Pratchety certainly has a point. One that instantly springs to mind is Journeys End when Donna defeats a Dalek army but rocking up and turning some dials.
However, eBay he describes is The Tenth Doc's persona. He was a Doctor that truly believed his own hype, right from his encounter with the Sycorax to the Waters of Mars. He only really humbled in End if Time when he realised his game was up. He was genuilely full of life when the Timelords were defeated - and then Wilf knocked four times. Eleven is different and is being written differently. Rather than coming up with it all in his head, the clues if how to solve the episodes big problem are being seeded throughout the episode, to the new series' credit. I reckon, if I really think about it, I could up with a list of solutions that I accepted at the time and thought which just seemed silly. Whatever the case, I too will be watching each week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3
|
Having a quick read of the full article in the SFX blogs, it does appear that he's referring more to the Tennant doctor.
In the whole article I think the only reference he makes to the current series is that "I might shout at the screen again, but I will be watching on Saturday. Besides he now has a kissogram girl for his sidekick, so things can only get better", which leads to think his gripe is not with the current series, but with the events that went before...Dr Who being lifted by angels in the episode with the Titanic, everyone praying for Dr Who...the man has a point, Dr Who was being made god-like, and that was wrong. He's a time traveller, not a deity. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:06.




I really enjoyed Monstrous Regiment!

Considering that ratings wise the specials didn't do that badly....