I don't think it's that bad, but it's not "good" enough in my judgement. The song is okay, but I really feel Josh does not have the experience and/or the big voice which will be needed for success on May 29th. You only have to watch the preview videos in which the UK is preceded by Norway. Their song is a ballad which builds to a vote-winning crescendo, sung with great power. It is a huge production in a massive stadium. Then we have Josh jammed into TV centre with a few hundred people clapping along while he looks and sounds like what he is, a contestant on a TV reality show whose previous biggest audience was at the start of a fun run.
Of course his performance will be stronger on the big night and I hope he proves me completely wrong and gets a place in the top 15. But so far the UK is one of the few countries to have scored no points on the many polls of international Eurovision fans, and I fear this will be reflected when it comes to the contest itself.
And who is to blame ? The BBC of course for not putting in anything like the effort they did last year. It's within the BBC's power to promote our selection across radio and TV and have more than a just one-off programme to chose the entry. If they did that they might attract more than the basically amateur set of contestants we chose from this year. I feel sorry for Stock and Waterman but wonder why they couldn't persuade a bigger voice to take up the challenge.
And now it will get even worse. If we place lowly then the masses will complain "it's all so political" and make it even less likely that a substantial act will perform for the UK next year. In fact it's not political, you have to be a good singer with a strong song in order to win. I feel there are at least 20 other countries who are better than us this year in those terms, regardless of politics and geography.