• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
The silence around Bruce Forsyth's future
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
Easylistener
24-05-2010
So Bruce is now refusing to comment. His future on Strictly is 'strictly confidential'. Seems an odd state of affairs for somebody who until recently had expressed no desire to retire.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s104/...ly-future.html

I am now wondering whether Bruce has decided not to return for the new series but has agreed to wait for a new host to be found before anouncing his departure.

Either that or he is going to remain on the show in a very different role.

Any thoughts?
Mystical123
24-05-2010
No news could be good news if said lack of news is implying he won't be returning
KnowAll27
24-05-2010
If he goes - Graham Norton please. Have been well impressed by him on Over The Rainbow.
Doug P
25-05-2010
Originally Posted by Force Ten:
“I do hope so!”

Stuck record. Strictly is a make-up of many successful elements, and Brucie is certainly one of them.
Doug P
25-05-2010
Originally Posted by KnowAll27:
“If he goes - Graham Norton please. Have been well impressed by him on Over The Rainbow.”

He was good, but he looked bored and washed out during the finale.
Doug P
25-05-2010
Originally Posted by boddism:
“
Sorry for ageism, but I dont think an 82 (?) yr old should be presenting BBC1's prime time Sat night entertainment show! ”

As opposed to SOME of the vaccuous personality-free nitwits who make up the younger presenters of both sexes?
Mystical123
25-05-2010
Originally Posted by Doug P:
“Stuck record. Strictly is a make-up of many successful elements, and Brucie is certainly one of them.”

Not in my opinion he's not, in fact he's probably the worst thing about the show. His jokes aren't funny, he has to prompt the crowd to laugh, he still can't pronounce Ola Jordan's name right after 4 years....I could go on....
Jan2555*GG*
25-05-2010
Originally Posted by Doug P:
“Stuck record. Strictly is a make-up of many successful elements, and Brucie is certainly one of them.”

He used to be but that was at least 2 series ago.....time for a change
Missy Moo
25-05-2010
Originally Posted by KnowAll27:
“If he goes - Graham Norton please. Have been well impressed by him on Over The Rainbow.”

From today's DS story : Norton confirmed that he is in talks with the BBC over other Saturday night formats, but "nothing is fixed".

I hope he replaces Bruce. GN has been much maligned over the years, but he knows the boundaries - he can be filthy (and funny!) on his chat show but knows what's appropriate for a family show. And a bit of camp never hurt anyone, Daarling!
MadonnaMIX
25-05-2010
I would love to see either Graham Norton or Paul O,Grady get the show they have the perfect amount of camp comedy & presenting skills

Bruce Forsyth is just not funny his jokes are just embarrasing , And he stubles over his lines when he is presenting the links

The show where Tess & Claudia presented was far more entertaining apart from the bits with Ronnie Corbett

Ps the BBC should stop putting Strictly up against the X Factor
St Luke Saint
25-05-2010
if Bruce does go the BBC could do a lot worse than getting Dancing With The Stars host, Tom Bergeron over. He has a good rapport with Len & Bruno, is funny but not OTT.
Force Ten
26-05-2010
Unfortunately Strictly clashes with DWTS which is why Len and Bruno fly backwards and forwards every week. I can't see Tom Bergeron doing the same thing as he has other commitments in the US as well as DWTS. Much as I would love him to do it.
Dorabella14
26-05-2010
Originally Posted by Paace:
“I disagree, it will be very, very difficult to fill this role with the right person when Bruce retires. The balance has to be correct to get someone who is not too overpowering and they must have a passion for dancing and likes SCD. The only person I believe who could fill this role is Anton. Brian Connolly can be very funny but may be too overpowering and I don't know if he likes the show.”

"Very very difficult??" are you sure???

Tess D managed perfectly well on the night that Bruce was down with flu and showed that she's perfectly OK on her own. Ronnie Corbett obviously thought so too.
Many viewers praised that show as being the best in the series for presentations - it was full of snafus, like jade's injury, but Tess managed it fine, absolutely fine.

The only question is who replaces Tess backstage if Claudia Winkelmann prefers to stick to her own show ITT. Zoe Ball would be great here, or any of the past presenters who've been on the show, including Kate garroway - about to get the sack from GMTV. It really doesn't have to be Chris Hollins!!


Bruce in permanent retirement would by itself bring the show back from 19th into 21st century.

The BBC could spend his extravagant salary on better sets and more money for the professionals.
Dorabella14
26-05-2010
Originally Posted by Missy Moo:
“From today's DS story : Norton confirmed that he is in talks with the BBC over other Saturday night formats, but "nothing is fixed".

I hope he replaces Bruce. GN has been much maligned over the years, but he knows the boundaries - he can be filthy (and funny!) on his chat show but knows what's appropriate for a family show. And a bit of camp never hurt anyone, Daarling!”

Graham Norton has been quoted elsewhere as saying that he's already toning down his jokes and is ready to tone them down further as the public is now turning against the "rude and filthy is fun" fashion at long last. He could be quite a safe host, as "Rainbow" has shown. But the SCRIPTWRITERS need to be changed, now.
Mystical123
26-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dorabella14:
“Graham Norton has been quoted elsewhere as saying that he's already toning down his jokes and is ready to tone them down further as the public is now turning against the "rude and filthy is fun" fashion at long last. He could be quite a safe host, as "Rainbow" has shown. But the SCRIPTWRITERS need to be changed, now.”

Graham Norton would at least have the ingenuity to deviate from the script and react properly to unplanned incidents/comments, a skill Bruce lost years before Strictly.
Missy Moo
26-05-2010
Originally Posted by Mystical123:
“Graham Norton would at least have the ingenuity to deviate from the script and react properly to unplanned incidents/comments, a skill Bruce lost years before Strictly.”

Can't believe I'm going to defend Bruce, but I disagree! He very occasionally redeems himself by reacting off the cuff, though he invariably uses it as an excuse to say "look at me - I'm the star!". His main problem is the autocue/script.

As much as I like Paul O'Grady (his R2 show is essential listening), I feel he would go too far off script and wouldn't run a tight enough ship. He's another one who makes it all about him and has obviously got some prima donna tendencies, too - hence the less than amicable departures from both ITV and C4.

Graham Norton is now Mr Saturday Night (sorry, Bruce!) and should claim his rightful place!
Vivacious Lady
26-05-2010
I quite like the idea of Graham Norton hosting strictly (I know lots of people might feel otherwise) At least I like the way he has hosted Over the Rainbow and the other ALW linked programmes. He had a good rapport with ALW and much more warmth than many other presenters. From what I remember he was ok on the other dance show (Strictly Dance Fever).
CaroUK
26-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dorabella14:
“Graham Norton has been quoted elsewhere as saying that he's already toning down his jokes and is ready to tone them down further as the public is now turning against the "rude and filthy is fun" fashion at long last. He could be quite a safe host, as "Rainbow" has shown. But the SCRIPTWRITERS need to be changed, now.”

If Bruce goes - so does one of the scriptwriters - HE is listed as a scriptwriter in the credits, so he himself is responsible for the awful jokes etc that "they told him to say..."
Vivadiva
27-05-2010
I would like to see Graham take over. Paul O'Grady can be a bit much at times, and I remember him saying in an interview a few years ago he would 'never' want to host SCD, and even criticised it. Plus his ITV contract starts up again around that time, they wouldn't let him go over to the BBC.

Jason Manford might be alright? He is clearly keen on getting into presenting, with his move to The One Show etc.
Greggybaby UK
27-05-2010
Bruce has never EVER been any good with autocue - Even in his prime. His strength has always been, and is to this day, non-written, off the fly hosting.

Tonight's HIGNFY will be interesting
George's Mom
27-05-2010
I am coming round to the idea of Graham Norton replacing Brucie (if it happens) but I would never have thought that a year ago
liverpool.lass
27-05-2010
Yes, I think Graham Norton would be a good choice. I have to fastforward Bruce, he just makes me cringe.
solare
27-05-2010
I would vote for Graham too.

He's shown himself to be a good presenter on other programmes and would be perfect for the kitsch of Strictly.

I've never liked Bruce. He's just such a show off.
sunnymeg
27-05-2010
Now that money is tight I think the BBC will want to get Graham Norton to do more for his money, so I think they might be looking to get rid of Bruce and use his salary to pay the participants. Also re Brian Conley, I think his brother works backstage on Strictly, I'm sure he was on ITT a couple of years ago. Maybe the two of them would like to work together, or maybe not?

Edit to add Alan Conley worked on Strictly in 2007.
Last edited by sunnymeg : 27-05-2010 at 17:25
jjackson42
27-05-2010
Brucie's performance on HIGNFY should have ruled him out from ever appearing on ANY TV again!! Dire doesn't even come close.

JJ
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map