DS Forums

 
 

what do you think of matt smith as the doctor


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-05-2010, 10:19
lach doch mal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sofas are deities
Posts: 16,123
Yep, and tomorrow night it will be Matt
Most certainly, and how much I'm looking forward to it (only good thing on such a gloomy day).

The Warrior Gate does look interesting though, and Tom Baker is a mighty fine doctor, you might have heard of him.
lach doch mal is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 07-05-2010, 10:20
Webslark
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Posts: 18,918
Most certainly, and how much I'm looking forward to it (only good thing on such a gloomy day).

The Warrior Gate does look interesting though, and Tom Baker is a mighty fine doctor, you might have heard of him.
Certainly have

Care for a jelly baby?
Webslark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2010, 10:22
lach doch mal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sofas are deities
Posts: 16,123
Certainly have

Care for a jelly baby?
Not many have, you know.

... and why thank you, if it is laced in CHV.
lach doch mal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2010, 10:24
Webslark
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Posts: 18,918
Not many have, you know.

... and why thank you, if it is laced in CHV.
With a centre of neat CHV in a sugar capsule

If you are gonna do alcoholic sweeties, do them properly
Webslark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2010, 10:26
lach doch mal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sofas are deities
Posts: 16,123
With a centre of neat CHV in a sugar capsule
Thank you, they are my favourites. I don't understand why your party did not do better in the election (I think people are voting for the latest fad parties), I should have voted for you.

**apologies for taking this thread ofy topic. On a positive note, it was positive
lach doch mal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2010, 10:29
crazzyaz7
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
Script Meeting:

"Well Stephen, how do we explain how the Doctor defeated the Weeping Angels this time"

"We don't. We just get Matt to talk really fast so no one knows what he says and everyone will just accept it".

Frankly, your assertion that someone who doesn't agree with your (bizarre) views must be nitpicking is pathetic.
even though I don't have a huge problem with the pace that Matt speaks, I know sometimes there are occasions where i feel the subttitle is necessary, or re-wtch...but like i said I found this with past Doctors too...including my favourite Tennant. But I have to say that the example you use is completely unfair...as the way the Angels are defeated is mostly self-explanitory....the Doctor doesn't even need to say much and its pretty much clear, and I say this as soemone who didn't like the solution, mainly because it become about the crack rather than the angels...but Matt was crystal clear when telling the Angels that they were draining out the power, and then asking River to get a grip.

In fact all the solutions so far have been crystal clear when it comes to the Doctor "explaining them" mainly because there hasn't been a huge need to do so...as out of the four stories we have had...Amy solved two of them, and in the Eleventh Hour....it was obvious what the Doctor did with both the virus (very predictable even) and then telling the Atraxi to run.....

So fair enough if you cannot understand him...but sorry to say, the resolutions to the story don't come under this...as much as so far I haven't been a fan of the resolutions....because they have not really needed the Doctor to explian in every little detail. Or at least hasn't even given an explanation....so not being able to understand him shouldn't really be an issue in terms of the resolutions
crazzyaz7 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:29.