Originally Posted by Adam Kelleher:
“Script Meeting:
"Well Stephen, how do we explain how the Doctor defeated the Weeping Angels this time"
"We don't. We just get Matt to talk really fast so no one knows what he says and everyone will just accept it".
Frankly, your assertion that someone who doesn't agree with your (bizarre) views must be nitpicking is pathetic.”
even though I don't have a huge problem with the pace that Matt speaks, I know sometimes there are occasions where i feel the subttitle is necessary, or re-wtch...but like i said I found this with past Doctors too...including my favourite Tennant. But I have to say that the example you use is completely unfair...as the way the Angels are defeated is mostly self-explanitory....the Doctor doesn't even need to say much and its pretty much clear, and I say this as soemone who didn't like the solution, mainly because it become about the crack rather than the angels...but Matt was crystal clear when telling the Angels that they were draining out the power, and then asking River to get a grip.
In fact all the solutions so far have been crystal clear when it comes to the Doctor "explaining them" mainly because there hasn't been a huge need to do so...as out of the four stories we have had...Amy solved two of them, and in the Eleventh Hour....it was obvious what the Doctor did with both the virus (very predictable even) and then telling the Atraxi to run.....
So fair enough if you cannot understand him...but sorry to say, the resolutions to the story don't come under this...as much as so far I haven't been a fan of the resolutions....because they have not really needed the Doctor to explian in every little detail. Or at least hasn't even given an explanation....so not being able to understand him shouldn't really be an issue in terms of the resolutions
”
). 
.