• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
I think I have spotted what we are missing in Episode One
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
ductur
13-06-2010
Originally Posted by Gutted Girl:
“I've wondered for weeks whether the thing that we've been missing is where does the staircase next to Amy's bedroom go to? Maybe the additional door on the first floor was meant to draw our attention away from it and The Lodger tonight was meant to remind us of it.”

That's what I've been saying since early May. Only you're the first person since I've been posting this theory who has agreed with me...

Originally Posted by sebbie3000:
“Neither. Nothing is wrong with Amelia's/Amy's house.

My aunt lives in one very similar.

And Karl Pilkington has to be one of the biggest buffoons I've ever listened to... Seriously? You're thinking he of all people is on to something...”

If you read all of my original posts, you will see that it isn't an ordinary house.... Exterior shots show it to be a two story house with a shallow roof... very little roofspace/attic. My inlaws used to live in one too. Those types of house do not have such a substantial staircase to lead to what is basically a crawlspace... they have a square opening in a ceiling, usually the landing ceiling, and one needs a ladder to get up there. Like Guttedgirl says... The subplot of The Lodger was to remind/reinforce viewers of that in the same way that the Chameleon Arch was used in Family of Blood to introduce the concept before it's use in The Sound Of Drums


The reference to Karl Pilkngton was just to take the p*** out of the guy who said I must be KP to believe the above...

D
sebbie3000
13-06-2010
Originally Posted by ductur:
“That's what I've been saying since early May. Only you're the first person since I've been posting this theory who has agreed with me...



If you read all of my original posts, you will see that it isn't an ordinary house.... Exterior shots show it to be a two story house with a shallow roof... very little roofspace/attic. My inlaws used to live in one too. Those types of house do not have such a substantial staircase to lead to what is basically a crawlspace... they have a square opening in a ceiling, usually the landing ceiling, and one needs a ladder to get up there. Like Guttedgirl says... The subplot of The Lodger was to remind/reinforce viewers of that in the same way that the Chameleon Arch was used in Family of Blood to introduce the concept before it's use in The Sound Of Drums


The reference to Karl Pilkngton was just to take the p*** out of the guy who said I must be KP to believe the above...

D”

Unfortunately, by using The Lodger as a refernce, you discredit your own theory.

One of the major facets of the story was that they couldn't be on the second floor because there wasn't one. Yet the house was clearly two stories high for everyone to see. Even the Doctor himself was fooled.

How does that reinforce your first theory when it's obvous from the outside that Amy's house has ony two defined floors (an arguably an attic room)? Surely by your reasoning, we wouldn't be having this conversation, as there would quite patently be another set of windows to explain the extra flight of stairs. In other words: it would be unnoticeable.
sebbie3000
13-06-2010
Originally Posted by ductur:
“That's what I've been saying since early May. Only you're the first person since I've been posting this theory who has agreed with me...



If you read all of my original posts, you will see that it isn't an ordinary house.... Exterior shots show it to be a two story house with a shallow roof... very little roofspace/attic. My inlaws used to live in one too. Those types of house do not have such a substantial staircase to lead to what is basically a crawlspace... they have a square opening in a ceiling, usually the landing ceiling, and one needs a ladder to get up there. Like Guttedgirl says... The subplot of The Lodger was to remind/reinforce viewers of that in the same way that the Chameleon Arch was used in Family of Blood to introduce the concept before it's use in The Sound Of Drums


The reference to Karl Pilkngton was just to take the p*** out of the guy who said I must be KP to believe the above...

D”

Also, as for the pre-intrduction thing, I feel it's much more likely to be the fact of using non-technological household items to create technology. He did it in Amy's Choice and in this last episode - with Craig pointing that very same fact out in a rater jarringly obvious way.

We already know there is to be a Blue-Peter prize winning 'home-made' Tardis console waiting to appear in this series...
WhitbyBoy1987
13-06-2010
Long-time lurker, first time poster

I have just re-watched episode one and there was one thing thats sticks out to me and it is that the doctor re-sets all the digital displays in the world to zero to make the atraxi spot prisoner zero.

surely that would cause a few problems

and no one has mentioned it on here to my recolection... coverin the no one spotted it yet
MrOstentatious
13-06-2010
Here you can see the light and the staircase:

http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/5183/capture1fjc.png


Here you can see that it is blocked of at the end and it's impossible for there to be a light there unless someone put a table lamp there:

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/6167/captureja.png
Dizx
13-06-2010
Amelia hears the TARDIS just before the Doctor ask Amy to go with him, when she's waiting for him. I'm sure...!
rejazz
13-06-2010
Maybe the doctor Amy goes with at the end of The Eleventh Hour is the Jacket!doctor from Flesh and Stone.
moonstone25
13-06-2010
Originally Posted by rejazz:
“Maybe the doctor Amy goes with at the end of The Eleventh Hour is the Jacket!doctor from Flesh and Stone.”

I was wondering about that- he says to her to remember he's a madman with a box as one day it may save her life...
justine01
13-06-2010
Originally Posted by MrOstentatious:
“Here you can see the light and the staircase:

http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/5183/capture1fjc.png


Here you can see that it is blocked of at the end and it's impossible for there to be a light there unless someone put a table lamp there:

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/6167/captureja.png”

After last night's episode I also think there is more to that staircase in Amy's house than has been obvious. But I still have no idea what it is about.
hopscotch23
13-06-2010
Originally Posted by MrOstentatious:
“Here you can see the light and the staircase:

http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/5183/capture1fjc.png


Here you can see that it is blocked of at the end and it's impossible for there to be a light there unless someone put a table lamp there:

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/6167/captureja.png”

Interesting!

Am wondering too whether the upstairs in The Lodger is linked with the upstairs of Amy's House? Though if the Doctor found a fledgling Tardis in JC's house why wasn't he more interested in who it belonged to. After all aren't Timelords the only ones to fly a Tardis? Maybe Prisoner Zero is a renegade Timelord? Mindless speculation once more!
ductur
13-06-2010
Originally Posted by sebbie3000:
“Unfortunately, by using The Lodger as a refernce, you discredit your own theory.

One of the major facets of the story was that they couldn't be on the second floor because there wasn't one. Yet the house was clearly two stories high for everyone to see. Even the Doctor himself was fooled.

How does that reinforce your first theory when it's obvous from the outside that Amy's house has ony two defined floors (an arguably an attic room)? Surely by your reasoning, we wouldn't be having this conversation, as there would quite patently be another set of windows to explain the extra flight of stairs. In other words: it would be unnoticeable.”

Well, I admit that this is a little contrived but obviously not every perception filter works in the same way, as the filter on the door in Amelia's house just made people not notice it, whilst it was definitely there; the perception filter on Craig's house created a whole floor. The wife and I spotted there was something wrong with Craig's house right from the word 'go' because the stairs led straight up to a door, and not a landing or half-landing.
It's possible that the perception filter that I believe was at work on Amelia's house made the whole of the third floor appear to be not there, when in fact it was. ... Remember that neither Amelia nor The Doctor noticed the stairs, it was just us, the viewers (or rather, just me and Guttedgirl) that did..

D
ductur
13-06-2010
Originally Posted by sebbie3000:
“We already know there is to be a Blue-Peter prize winning 'home-made' Tardis console waiting to appear in this series...”

I wasn't aware of this. I guess I'm going to see it in Amelia's attic then ?

D
No.6
14-06-2010
As far as we can tell, both interiors and exteriors to Amelia/Amy's house were filmed using the same building, so there must actually be another floor up there in the building as it is in it's normal, non-Doctor Who, life
SCD-Observer
14-06-2010
Originally Posted by ductur:
“That's what I've been saying since early May. Only you're the first person since I've been posting this theory who has agreed with me...D”

I agree with you too, when I saw the staircase leading to 'nothing', I was reminded of your thread.
bunnyds
14-06-2010
Originally Posted by HandsomeBB:
“One thing about that scene that no-ones mentioned yet is ...
why is there a light on in the middle of the day ?? ”

I have been bleating on about lights being on in the middle of the day since the start of this series*. Whenever there is an interior scene in normal settings it seems that there is an abundance of lights (standard, table, ceiling and wall) - much, much more than in an average house. They are always lit as well. Whether this has anything to do with the plot or just to make the scene visually more interesting I don't know.

* - on other DW forums.
nikolaikondom
14-06-2010
So when Moffat said there was somehting we did not notice, he meant litterally something that we did not notice because we could not see it.
Ja88ed
14-06-2010
Originally Posted by ductur:
“If you read all of my original posts, you will see that it isn't an ordinary house.... Exterior shots show it to be a two story house with a shallow roof... very little roofspace/attic. My inlaws used to live in one too. Those types of house do not have such a substantial staircase to lead to what is basically a crawlspace... they have a square opening in a ceiling, usually the landing ceiling, and one needs a ladder to get up there. ”

Have to disagree with you there. Plenty of old houses that have rooms in the roof have stairs to those rooms. You only get ladders in a ceiling opening if the rooms are the result of an old conversion.

Approximately half the houses on my street are like that
johnnysaucepn
14-06-2010
Originally Posted by MrOstentatious:
“Here you can see the light and the staircase:

http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/5183/capture1fjc.png


Here you can see that it is blocked of at the end and it's impossible for there to be a light there unless someone put a table lamp there:

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/6167/captureja.png”

Or unless you're working on a TV set. The shot with no light coming from above is set during daylight hours, where the dominant light is coming from the window. The night-time scenes need extra lighting, whether it's supposed to come from a real source or not.

It may not be that it's a whole new space - it may just be that the Doctor and Auntie Sharon are up there working on a makeshift TARDIS since the first one blew up, and they don't want to disturb their previous selves.

Basically, there's not enough info to tell.
rejazz
14-06-2010
Originally Posted by moonstone25:
“I was wondering about that- he says to her to remember he's a madman with a box as one day it may save her life...”

yeah! and the way he looks at the TARDIS monitor with the the crack on it when Amy's talking to him. Also, why does go back for her and try so hard to persuade her to come with him if he doesn't know how important she is going to be? he never did that with martha or rose or donna.
ductur
15-06-2010
Originally Posted by rejazz:
“yeah! and the way he looks at the TARDIS monitor with the the crack on it when Amy's talking to him. Also, why does go back for her and try so hard to persuade her to come with him if he doesn't know how important she is going to be? he never did that with martha or rose or donna.”

All will out in the next fortnight...

Spoiler
As has been shown by the leaked photos, The Doctor does go back to see Amelia whilst she is 7 and waiting for him to return in 5 minutes sat on her case in the garden.... The bit in The Lodger about Amy making sure she went to the newsagent to leave The Doctor the message "...and make sure you use a red pen..." was specifically placed to tell viewers that he can and will travel in and out of his own timeline to get the better of situations. It all comes together in this finale..

I bleated on about that months ago and was generally pooh poohed by some on here. Lets see if this post turns out to be right too ! (smug)

D
nobi4111
16-06-2010
There is one thing I have been wondering about.

Could Amelia heard and understood the atraxi said 'Prisoner zero has escaped' without the help of TARDIS?

-She said to Santa, she had heard voices.
-When Doctor listened the voice with a glass and started to murmur 'Prisoner zero h...', she said 'Prisoner zero has escaped. So I heard. What's this mean?'

I do not think the voice spoke English.
When there is TARDIS, it automatically translate anything. But without such a help, ordinary people may not understand alien languages.
If she knew this sentence before that night, she might not be an ordinary Scotish girl.

Perhaps I have completely misunderstood.
johnnysaucepn
16-06-2010
Originally Posted by nobi4111:
“I do not think the voice spoke English.
When there is TARDIS, it automatically translate anything. But without such a help, ordinary people may not understand alien languages.”

Hmmm. When the Atraxi were broadcasting across the world, they were broadcasting in all the regional languages. I'm taking that as evidence that no translation was happening, and the speech through the crack could easily have been English. On the other hand, nobody else commented on what they heard, so it's a little uncertain.

However, two points about that are:
1) The Atraxi had to follow the Doctor to find out where Zero was hiding, suggesting they didn't necessarily know that the crack opened up onto Earth.
2) Why would they have needed to send the exact same message via psychic paper, unless they didn't know what species would receive it?
FrySomething
16-06-2010
Originally Posted by Wize:
“There are quite a few things he got away with in that first episode.

Tardis doors opening outward when it crashes.
Amy packing and wanting to go with the doctor when she was small.
Sonic screwdriver playing up from the moment he lands the tardis upright (before zero slimes it) as it did in The Library.
Tardis making a new screwdriver itself.
Being able to fly with the new layout without knowing what all the new buttons and dials do.
Lots of possibilities.

But there was the line about "What did I say to you when you were 6?" (or however old she was)

Or maybe its what prisoner zero looks like above camera shot that he got away with. Amy didn't see that bit of him to cover it with an impression.”

Has nobody ever read the sign on the outside of the TARDIS doors? It reads 'Pull To Open' at the bottom. So the really odd thing about them opening outwards in TEH was that that was the first time we'd ever seen them opening in the right direction.
moDis n MaviS
16-06-2010
Originally Posted by FrySomething:
“Has nobody ever read the sign on the outside of the TARDIS doors? It reads 'Pull To Open' at the bottom. So the really odd thing about them opening outwards in TEH was that that was the first time we'd ever seen them opening in the right direction.”

very very very good point....
Corwin
16-06-2010
Originally Posted by FrySomething:
“Has nobody ever read the sign on the outside of the TARDIS doors? It reads 'Pull To Open' at the bottom. So the really odd thing about them opening outwards in TEH was that that was the first time we'd ever seen them opening in the right direction.”

That pull to open just refers to the box in the door that contains the phone, not the actual doors themselves.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map