So let me get this right: the two girls who were cited as topping viewers votes by The Daily Star and who had never been in the bottom two, were BOTH eliminated on Saturday.

Does anyone else find this weird?

I mean, the Star may be a steaming pile of BS a lot of the time, but to get it THAT wrong? Both of those girls gone, the weekend they're revealed as favourites, and to MUCH confusion from the rest of us.

Ironically, both of them were really strong this week and I haven't rated either previously.

Did someone plant that story as a red herring to drum up some votes? Were those two actually not that popular but were used as a media foil? In which case why was neither in the bottom 2 before, which gave the story real credibility?

Or was it true, were they favourites and it caused a massive surge in voting for the other girls?

They probably topped the polls once a few weeks back and the Star made a big story out of it.

I know nothing add up. As you say, they do print a lot of crap but it's just extremely weird. The BBC insider was probably ALW himself.

It's obvious the chosen one isn't either, looks like Andrew has another Lewis Bradley on his hands.

Well we know Jessica had the lowest tonight so I don't think there's anything dodgy going on there.

Why do we know that? Has it been released?

I watched with my mum and sis; mum likes Jess, my sister doesn't like Jenny, and I don't like Jess. But all of us agreed those two were in their element, while Danielle and Sophie were in our eyes/ears, the weakest of the night by a long way.