Originally Posted by Score:
“Yeah I agree. Normally I would say that BGT Results were very low, but considering they started halfway through Junor Apprentice, and starting against Junior Apprentice was a Harry Hill repeat, that isn't all bad.”
I disagree. I think it's quite a bad rating for the results show, even taking into account that Harry Hill's TV Burp was on before it not Corrie.
First of all, when has BGT had to rely on lead-ins to get good ratings? In the last couple of years, it's always brought in the audiences regardless of what's on before it. Also, Harry Hill's TV Burp got about the same rating as Emmerdale which led into the first BGT show and that did well (a great share especially).
Junior Apprentice was harder competition than the other 9pm shows so far this week, but BGT's faced EE twice and averaged 9m+ up against it. I would say JA is definitely easier competition than EE. Even Eurovision's more popular than JA, but BGT still managed almost 10m against that.
I just think the seperate results show don't work for the semi finals. The first 15 minutes are complete filler: going over the phone numbers once again and seeing a guest artist performance. And I can understand why not as many people want to stay around for the actual results because it's not like The X Factor where we really know the contestants due to weeks of performances and there's a greater connection between the audience and performers. Also because there's so little content in the show, the judges decision keeps being made around 21:52, meaning people probably switch off after that and lower the average for the final 5-10mins. Last night's rating was the lowest for BGT in over two years. Even most of the semis in the first series, which on the whole was way less popular, got better ratings. It is disappointing IMO.
Ironically, the final should have a separate results show not the semis!