• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Amy & Rory Waving To Themselves
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
Dave-H
22-05-2010
Was I the only one absolutely horrified by that?

Of course if time travel were actually possible, and I'm well aware that it isn't and never will be, for very good reasons, any time traveller could do exactly what Amy and Rory apparently did.

Not one of the Doctor's past companions has ever been seen to do that before though, because it throws up so many paradoxes, anomalies and inconsistencies that my head hurts just trying to think about it!

Unless this is explored further and/or explained later in the series, I feel this is a bad error of judgement by the writers.

It was probably intended just to be a throwaway joke, like the library card and the notice on the TARDIS locker, but this nonsense really is going too far! I know it's only fantasy anyway, but it was quite unnecessary.
2shy2007
22-05-2010
Well , Rose saw her young self in Fathers day, and we all know what happened there
Muttley76
22-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dave-H:
“Unless this is explored further and/or explained later in the series, I feel this is a bad error of judgement by the writers.

It was probably intended just to be a throwaway joke, like the library card and the notice on the TARDIS locker, but this nonsense really is going too far! I know it's only fantasy anyway, but it was quite unnecessary.
”

I'm fairly certain it will be further explored in this story never mind this series.

And horrified? Really? I find kids starving on the streets of London horrifying not a scene in a tv show that may not work for me!
justine01
22-05-2010
Well, as I do expect some "history rewriting" coming up with the finale, I guess it is just one part of that overall arc.

After all, there is still the notion that th Doctor will be back to visit Amelia, or Amy in the Byzantium forrest, so there might be a clue involved here too.
Dave-H
22-05-2010
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“And horrified? Really? I find kids starving on the streets of London horrifying not a scene in a tv show that may not work for me! ”

Fair point, bad choice of word.

As I said, I'm still hoping it will be revisited and explained.
I mean, what happened to the "other" Amy and Rory?
Did they just disappear before things all kicked off, and they weren't caught in the force field?
And wouldn't they have known exactly what was going to happen anyway?!

My brain hurts..........
Muttley76
22-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dave-H:
“Fair point, bad choice of word.
”

I put the wrong smilie by mistake, had intened to use as it was a bit tongue in cheek!
CheeseyDude1337
22-05-2010
Yeah but how come everyone has missed the obvious; They will get stuck inside the force field, so they would meet up with current Amy/Rory.
Dave-H
22-05-2010
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“I put the wrong smilie by mistake, had intened to use as it was a bit tongue in cheek!”

No offence taken!
smiddlehurst
23-05-2010
Originally Posted by CheeseyDude1337:
“Yeah but how come everyone has missed the obvious; They will get stuck inside the force field, so they would meet up with current Amy/Rory.”

Nope, that Force Field was VERY local, pretty much covered drill to church. Future Amy and Rory were a fair distance away and would have known what was to come so they'd only get stuck inside if they wanted to be.

As for the scene itself... it could easily be a throwaway moment but I don't believe that. Confidential talks about how they needed to chop 15 minutes out of the episode and that's, what, 30 seconds or more right there which set up a shot that was cut? Nah, you only keep that if it's going somewhere and notice that both us viewers and the happy couple themselves never see.. uh, themselves, only the Doctor did, so for all we know it's Amy with a Rory/Dalek hybrid on her arm.
DavetheScot
23-05-2010
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“I'm fairly certain it will be further explored in this story never mind this series.”

Me too. I'm sure that bit has to be significant to the plot.
jac16888
23-05-2010
Originally Posted by smiddlehurst:
“ so for all we know it's Amy with a Rory/Dalek hybrid on her arm.”

or a couple of etheric beam locators?
Corwin
23-05-2010
Given that the Doctor in the next time trailer and in the deleted scene seen in DWC says this event is not a fixed point in time it's possible that things turn out in such a way that Amy and Rory are not together in 10 years time.

So we might see the two figures disapear at some point when something changes.

I also think the DS teaser below has something to do with future Amy/Rory.*

Quote:
“3. Pay attention to the script very early on in this episode. A lot of the lines will have added poignancy after the story is done with.”

*If they really are from 10 years in the future, someone said they were wearing the same clothes current Amy and Rory were wearing. They could be from a few minutes/hours in the future and travelled back for a reason.
Fudd
23-05-2010
Originally Posted by Corwin:
“*If they really are from 10 years in the future, someone said they were wearing the same clothes current Amy and Rory were wearing. They could be from a few minutes/hours in the future and travelled back for a reason.”

I've just looked at the scene on iplayer - I don't think they are wearing the same clothes. Future Rory is wearing a blue jacket and white shirt. Present Rory is wearing a black bomber jacket and a checked shirt. Future Amy appears to be wearing a white blouse and red jacket. Present Amy is in a red jacket and shirt.
FATCHOPS
23-05-2010
Oops!
Last edited by FATCHOPS : 23-05-2010 at 08:19
DICKENS99
23-05-2010
I can't believe Moffatt would write such a 'non sequitur' scene and not have it be seen to be eventually relevant....maybe it's keyed into the idea of some events being fixed points which have to happen and he uses it as an example when one of them is lost to show that they must be eventually found...or something....I'll keep my homburg on a low heat just in case I'm wrong.
aquiss
23-05-2010
There was to be more screenplay on the waving bit, however it was inside a cut scene (details found http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s....php?t=1265180 ).

Maybe the bit we saw should have also got cut. I guess we have to wait for part 2 to find out
tingramretro
23-05-2010
Originally Posted by Dave-H:
“Was I the only one absolutely horrified by that?

Of course if time travel were actually possible, and I'm well aware that it isn't and never will be, for very good reasons, any time traveller could do exactly what Amy and Rory apparently did.

Not one of the Doctor's past companions has ever been seen to do that before though, because it throws up so many paradoxes, anomalies and inconsistencies that my head hurts just trying to think about it!”

What, exist in the same time and place as their past self? It happened in Day of the Daleks, Mawdryn Undead and Father's Day.
Larry1971
23-05-2010
did seem a totally pointless sene to me.
tingramretro
23-05-2010
Originally Posted by Larry1971:
“did seem a totally pointless sene to me.”

Possibly because we haven't yet been shown what the point of it was.
craggers
23-05-2010
Maybe it wasn't a wave of hello, but a wave of be careful/help?
Listentome
23-05-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“Possibly because we haven't yet been shown what the point of it was.”

Exactly. I suspect we will see a scene in the finale from the perspective of the 'other' Amy and Rory. Perhaps they weren't waving, but trying to warn The Doctor of something.
IvanIV
23-05-2010
It may not be relevant to this story, I'd say it was ordered by Moff himself. Maybe instead of Amy's crack we got its consequence. Although judging by the length of Amy's shorts/skirt we might still get both
allen_who
23-05-2010
Well I think it was quite a clever idea. You have to bear in mind that the scene where amy is swallowed up by the ground could be a bit distressing for younger viewers... So by showing them waving at themselves 10 years in the future then you are basically being told Amy will be okay
amos_brearley
23-05-2010
It made sense to me as it was the only future time zone thus far that Rory and Amy COULD check up on their past selves, it being 2020 Wales. They're hardly likely to rock up on the Starship UK or the Byzantium are they? I'm sure Rose would have gone to the 2012 Olympics, were she still in our universe.
Dave-H
23-05-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“What, exist in the same time and place as their past self? It happened in Day of the Daleks, Mawdryn Undead and Father's Day.”

My memory of the first two is hazy, but I think all of them are very different scenarios to what we've just seen, as are different incarnations of the Doctor meeting each other.
My issue is with companions waiting in "real time" to revisit scenarios that they've already experienced just on a whim, and presumably watching them happen again, which is what we seemed to be seeing here.
I'm sorry but you just don't do that sort of thing in time travel stories. Suspension of disbelief becomes impossible if you do.

Originally Posted by amos_brearley:
“It made sense to me as it was the only future time zone thus far that Rory and Amy COULD check up on their past selves, it being 2020 Wales. They're hardly likely to rock up on the Starship UK or the Byzantium are they? I'm sure Rose would have gone to the 2012 Olympics, were she still in our universe.”

Just because it's the only time so far that they could have done it doesn't make it make sense.
Rose waiting in "real time" to see herself and the Doctor saving the 2012 Olympics would be exactly the same, and just as silly.


If it's all rationally explained later I will be delighted.
Perhaps I'm taking this all too seriously, I need a lie down........
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map