Originally Posted by chuffnobbler:
“
I don't agree with Ella's thoughts about when DW is set. Moffatt's DW is still set in the present, but a different view of the present. The Davies stuff had a "highrise flats and digital telly" approach to the present day, but the Moffatt stuff doesn't feature those things (so far). I got very bored with endless shots of London. Not everyone lives in a city (or even in London). One of the strengths of old DW is that it showed so many different aspects of life in Britain. There were villages, fields, countryside, stately homes, cities, power stations, roads ... the Davies stuff has focussed on the more urban aspects of that, while the Moffatt stuff is looking in other directions. Very welcome it is, too.”
“
I don't agree with Ella's thoughts about when DW is set. Moffatt's DW is still set in the present, but a different view of the present. The Davies stuff had a "highrise flats and digital telly" approach to the present day, but the Moffatt stuff doesn't feature those things (so far). I got very bored with endless shots of London. Not everyone lives in a city (or even in London). One of the strengths of old DW is that it showed so many different aspects of life in Britain. There were villages, fields, countryside, stately homes, cities, power stations, roads ... the Davies stuff has focussed on the more urban aspects of that, while the Moffatt stuff is looking in other directions. Very welcome it is, too.”
Totally agree. I think that the fact that that so many people seem unable to relate to anything not set in an urban environment (indeed, in some cases don't even seem to believe that village life still exists) is rather sad. People should get out of town more often, maybe then they'd see there's more to life.




