Is it yet clear how many HM there will be? if there were more than usual then one or two could be sneakily evicted without going to a vote while retaining the weekly vote and the ringing cash registers for endemol. It will I think be either a HM or public decision for each eviction - the risk of arbitrarily evicting a popular HM (with resultant lost ratings and votes) would be too great...
So, how are they going to change the voting?
2 of 2
have you noticed that once a housemate is up for eviction if they survive they are up most weeks after that e.g. paul and alex how about giving them imunity for a week if they are up more than two weeks running
Isn't it fun though to see a HM dodge the bullet three or four times before finally being evicted? This goes right back to Caroline in series one. My one real regret over the double eviction last year was that it didn't allow Jon to challenge the mighty Paul's record for surviving eviction.
Originally Posted by Crimpo:
“Isn't it fun though to see a HM dodge the bullet three or four times before finally being evicted? This goes right back to Caroline in series one. My one real regret over the double eviction last year was that it didn't allow Jon to challenge the mighty Paul's record for surviving eviction.”
“Isn't it fun though to see a HM dodge the bullet three or four times before finally being evicted? This goes right back to Caroline in series one. My one real regret over the double eviction last year was that it didn't allow Jon to challenge the mighty Paul's record for surviving eviction.”
i think jon would have given him a run for his money
The thing about showing the others what was said in the diary room is that it would only work once. After that you'd get them being really nice and also you'd lose a lot of the bitching we see in the Diary room as they wouldn't risk it being shown. Would be hilarious though especially after a couple of weeks (when they think they have made alliances etc, who cares what they say at the start)
I certainly think the idea that an evicted HM will make a nomination or even 2-3 people for the week after they leave would be interesting.
Theres also using the result of a skill test (or group of tests) to determine nominees.
But personally I like the idea of making it linked to something silly, like those who slept most (and therefore contributed least to the house) or the ones who did the least cooking or cleaning. And do this for after the fact, might also make them do more stuff in the following weeks just in case.
I certainly think the idea that an evicted HM will make a nomination or even 2-3 people for the week after they leave would be interesting.
Theres also using the result of a skill test (or group of tests) to determine nominees.
But personally I like the idea of making it linked to something silly, like those who slept most (and therefore contributed least to the house) or the ones who did the least cooking or cleaning. And do this for after the fact, might also make them do more stuff in the following weeks just in case.
good shout Opaque - I like that idea. It'd also mean they couldn't relax since anything they do could put them up for noms - a bit evil mind 
My suggestions...
Automatic eviction... come last in the task... you leave on Friday....
Public nominate... HMs vote....
no evictions for 3 weeks... then open vote to evict 3 people in one go....
reverse nominations... HMs to nominate two ppl they would like to keep in the house, ppl with least amount of votes are put up for eviction.
BB scores the HMs behaviour... points scored for sleeping more that 8 hours, sunbathing without chatting, not joining in etc... public vote on highest point scorers
Computer to select random nominees... public then vote....
Automatic eviction... come last in the task... you leave on Friday....
Public nominate... HMs vote....
no evictions for 3 weeks... then open vote to evict 3 people in one go....
reverse nominations... HMs to nominate two ppl they would like to keep in the house, ppl with least amount of votes are put up for eviction.
BB scores the HMs behaviour... points scored for sleeping more that 8 hours, sunbathing without chatting, not joining in etc... public vote on highest point scorers
Computer to select random nominees... public then vote....
How they will improve the voting this year???
FIX IT.
H77 claims first prize for 'knowing' that BB5 was rigged by C4/€ndemol.
FIX IT.
H77 claims first prize for 'knowing' that BB5 was rigged by C4/€ndemol.
Bumped this thread up because it seems relevant - Could the three strikes for Kitten be a way of getting one of the less interesting HMs out early?? If so, then she is being manipulated by BB, in true Orwellian fashion. Not so much a plant, more a stooge so that BB can prune out selectively.
2 of 2
