It makes no sense without him. I am cross with the Doctor!!
They have to bring back Rory
1 of 2
Ummm, not sure about the title from a spoiler point of view. My feeling is that if the Tardis is at the centre of it, then he can come back, right? Right!??!
Originally Posted by TEDR:
“Ummm, not sure about the title from a spoiler point of view. My feeling is that if the Tardis is at the centre of it, then he can come back, right? Right!??!”
“Ummm, not sure about the title from a spoiler point of view. My feeling is that if the Tardis is at the centre of it, then he can come back, right? Right!??!”
Who can come back?
Originally Posted by k9fan:
“It makes no sense without him. I am cross with the Doctor!!”
“It makes no sense without him. I am cross with the Doctor!!”
why are you cross with the Doctor, it wasn't his fault! Blame that stupid Ambrose women if you have to blame someone!
He'll be back, NuWho likes its reset button. As much as I liked Rory I'm not too upset about his death because I don't expect it to stick.
Originally Posted by JCR:
“N.B.: C'mon, it's Moffat; if it doesn't have a happy ending I'll eat the 2nd Doctors hat.”
“N.B.: C'mon, it's Moffat; if it doesn't have a happy ending I'll eat the 2nd Doctors hat.”
^ This. Trust me, Rory will be brought back somehow.
Maybe they'll do a sequel to The Enemy of the World, featuring Salamander's illegitimate son or whatever who happens to look exactly like Rory?
Why do we have to bring him back? Itll just make it trivial.... and pointless.
I always feel quite impressed if writers kill off their characters and leave them dead. It shows they're more infavour of a great story than their own sentimentality.
I always feel quite impressed if writers kill off their characters and leave them dead. It shows they're more infavour of a great story than their own sentimentality.
yeah I personally hope he stays dead, it's a cop-out and ruins the emotional impact when they kill a character off only for them to come back in a later episode.
Originally Posted by TEDR:
“Maybe they'll do a sequel to The Enemy of the World, featuring Salamander's illegitimate son or whatever who happens to look exactly like Rory?”
“Maybe they'll do a sequel to The Enemy of the World, featuring Salamander's illegitimate son or whatever who happens to look exactly like Rory?”
Amy arrives in a parallel world and makes off with Rory's parallel world counterpart. The evil Amy in the alt-world (a blonde, leather-clad "Baroness" type") swears revenge.
Moffat then gets a lawsuit from the producers of "Fringe".
Rory. 
Missing him already.
Amy will be even more insufferable to me without him there to balance things out
Missing him already.
Amy will be even more insufferable to me without him there to balance things out
I want Rory back!
I much preferred the dynamics between all three of them than when it was just the Doctor & Amy.
I much preferred the dynamics between all three of them than when it was just the Doctor & Amy.
Thank you 
In my opinion, Rory is a good companion and it is daft to kill him off when he has only just started. And yes, I agree, it worked much better with him there rather than the Doctor and Amy.
I was cross with the Doctor because Rory had saved his life, and the Doctor didn't seem to realise or care.
In my opinion, Rory is a good companion and it is daft to kill him off when he has only just started. And yes, I agree, it worked much better with him there rather than the Doctor and Amy.
I was cross with the Doctor because Rory had saved his life, and the Doctor didn't seem to realise or care.
Originally Posted by alexjones50:
“yeah I personally hope he stays dead, it's a cop-out and ruins the emotional impact when they kill a character off only for them to come back in a later episode.”
“yeah I personally hope he stays dead, it's a cop-out and ruins the emotional impact when they kill a character off only for them to come back in a later episode.”
Not when they're deliberately killed off so that they can come back, of course. There's plenty of obvious dangling threads there.
Sorry mate, but the title of your post is a spoiler.
The episode has only just gone out so time shifters might be a little annoyed if they happen to see page 1 of the forum - they don't even have to click on it to see what's happened.
The episode has only just gone out so time shifters might be a little annoyed if they happen to see page 1 of the forum - they don't even have to click on it to see what's happened.
Originally Posted by johnnysaucepn:
“Not when they're deliberately killed off so that they can come back, of course. There's plenty of obvious dangling threads there.”
“Not when they're deliberately killed off so that they can come back, of course. There's plenty of obvious dangling threads there.”
The ring, for a start.
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“why are you cross with the Doctor, it wasn't his fault! Blame that stupid Ambrose women if you have to blame someone!”
“why are you cross with the Doctor, it wasn't his fault! Blame that stupid Ambrose women if you have to blame someone!”
Yeah, it was the Doctor's fault. He should have got everyone safe in the Tardis and not got distracted with the crack.
But as I've been typing this it suddenly occurs to me I've no idea what you're blaming someone for? Nobody died did they? Can't remember that happening.
1 of 2
