• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Mysogyny ?
<<
<
6 of 6
>>
>
tingramretro
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“Well, it's very different so I suppose it takes a person with a bit of imagination, but the main character in Grey's is a woman called Meredith Grey. Now, as there is also a character called Lexie Grey ( her half-sister ) - technically if Meredith left , "Grey's Anatomy" could still continue on with the same title.
So - I see how Dr Who could continue beyond the 12 or 13 lives, but if it does for decades to come, there will more than like be a female Doctor at some stage, whether it's the same person or not.”

Sorry, but if you really think Doctor Who could continue without the Doctor, or with someone else claiming the name, you really don't get it. The Doctor is the show, an iconic character. However many faces he wears, there's only one Doctor just as there's only one Superman or Sherlock Holmes. It isn't just a title.
CustardCreamed
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by crazzyaz7:
“No I know you didn't accuse me of conservatism....but there was a thin line between you saying that those who don't agree and those who conservatists in your following sentence "I think whether you would like, or can imagine, the Doctor as female or not, depends on the person" so it basically suggest that you are making an assumption on what people are like because of their preferences...hence why I gave a short detail of my background, and my views on the sex of the Doctor.

No - I stand by that statement. It does depend on the person.

As for page two....yes there are a couple of comments that can be seen as misogynst, but they are done tongue in cheek in the same way female poster sometimes make jokes about men...I don't think they did it to offend as such, but make a joke about the point of this thread that the females of the show are unreasonable....rather than at women in general...heck maybe they are sexist, but there have been plenty more people not wanting a female Doctor who aren't sexist.....making an off-hand joke, which even women make (time of the month)...doesn't make someone an ultra conservative...


I don't think they were joking - no smilies or anything. But the feminists I know, - even if it was a joke they'd still have something to say about it , believe me ! ( And they'd be right ).



Well I guess we will have to agree to disagree here, as I already have pointed out many examples of the brilliant work that the show does anyway....Rose, Martha, Donna and Amy and many classic Companions like Romana, Sarah Jane and Zoe are sometimes shown as being equal or even better than the Doctor....and not because they are females, but because of who they are....so really how far can gender indifference go? In fact if I was to put on my socilogical hat, it could be argued that by making the Doctor a female, technically it is saying that the only way the show can have have women at the most equal is by replacing the man altogether....that isn't about gender indifference, that is about female power and reaching past the glass ceiling....its about making a statement, its about a women having to became like a man in order to achieve so called full potentaill....its not about the person anymore, its all about Gender....it would be making a huge point about women....not making then be seen as an individual person, which the companion role does perfectly....because despite not being the lead of the show, they often than not steal the show, its not because they are female, but because of who they are.


Yes we will have to disagree, but I think it's the very moment of regeneration which would make such a powerful statement about gender indifference/transcendence - The same person, in a different gender.




So yes making the Doctor female would be a great statement of female power....but gender indifference would disappear....because everyone would go on about the first female Doctor blah blah blah....just like people go on about Obama as the first black president, very few look at him as person, more look at him in some historical revolution....is that a good thing or a bad thing....I don't know depends on your viewpoint, but where there isn't a need for such a change, ie the Doctor becoming a female to prove a certain point even though being the Doctor isn't the ultimate power that the show can offer an actor or actress, there is no need for that change....”

I'm a person who is very strong on equality in every sense, but if there's one thing I've learned from this thread, it's that gender bias seems to be a much more entrenched kind of bias than racism or homophobia or anything else. It will take much more to overcome it.
crazzyaz7
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“Well, it's very different so I suppose it takes a person with a bit of imagination, but the main character in Grey's is a woman called Meredith Grey. Now, as there is also a character called Lexie Grey ( her half-sister ) - technically if Meredith left , "Grey's Anatomy" could still continue on with the same title.
So - I see how Dr Who could continue beyond the 12 or 13 lives, but if it does for decades to come, there will more than like be a female Doctor at some stage, whether it's the same person or not.”

I don't watch GA...but I watch Scrubs....and I haven't been hearing a lot of positives of the change there....

I don't want to sound rude or anything, so please don't take this the wrong way, but Doctor Who genuinly can't compare to shows like GA...or anyother other show in the world. Its success has been in change yes, but that the main concept has always remained, an alien who travels in time and Space in a blue box, and he looks like man.....and his best friends tend to be females....the fact the actor can change is part of the show anyway, but the character is the same, and will always remin so....like I said they may go for a female, but its not a must and niether needed for a show that gives women an equal stage....

There is a spin-off media if your interested where they have audio dramas based on a what if scenario of the Doctor being a female....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exile_(audio_drama) Chack it out
CustardCreamed
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“Sorry, but if you really think Doctor Who could continue without the Doctor, or with someone else claiming the name, you really don't get it. The Doctor is the show, an iconic character. However many faces he wears, there's only one Doctor just as there's only one Superman or Sherlock Holmes. It isn't just a title.”

The Doctor as we currently know the entity, has 1 or 2 more incarnations left. If you have some ingenious plot device as to how to get around this, let's hear it.
For the show to continue for decades to come, with the same title, it would have to be a different Doctor, and I've explained, using the example of Grey's, since someone else brought it up again - how this could be possible. ( I hope it DOES continue, because I'm confident I'll be proven right about the female
Doctor ).
discodolly25
02-06-2010
not that i would want Dr who to continue if the dr wasnt in it, but to jump on the Greys Anatomy bandwagon thing, one show thats been successful since its title character died (in 1994!) is Taggart.

the difference with shows like Taggart & GA is that they have multiple characters who can be part of a main story if the titled character isnt there (for whatever reason ie death of the main actor, actress going on maternity leave etc) but i'm sorry you cant have Dr Who without the Doctor, who only has one or two companions with him at one time (ok not including RTD's series finales )
tingramretro
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“I'm a person who is very strong on equality in every sense, but if there's one thing I've learned from this thread, it's that gender bias seems to be a much more entrenched kind of bias than racism or homophobia or anything else. It will take much more to overcome it.”

It isn't displaying a bias to want the character to remain who he's always been. Would you expect James Bond to become female? No, because he's male. oR how about a male Miss Marple? I can't see it, myself.

Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“The Doctor as we currently know the entity, has 1 or 2 more incarnations left. If you have some ingenious plot device as to how to get around this, let's hear it.”

It has already been strongly indicated (in The Five Doctors and in Utopia) that the regeneration limit was artificially imposed by the Time Lords; in the first instance, they offered the Master a new life cycle, in the second they'd apparently given him one. The Time Lords are gone, the limit need no longer apply.
Quote:
“For the show to continue for decades to come, with the same title, it would have to be a different Doctor, and I've explained, using the example of Grey's, since someone else brought it up again - how this could be possible. ( I hope it DOES continue, because I'm confident I'll be proven right about the female
Doctor ).”

It has already lasted almost fifty years without needing any such change, it can continue just as long again. The Doctor is the show. with a different character, it wouldn't be Doctor Who.
discodolly25
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“It isn't displaying a bias to want the character to remain who he's always been. Would you expect James Bond to become female? No, because he's male. oR how about a male Miss Marple? I can't see it, myself.
.”

to be fair, James Bond & Miss Marple arent Gallifreyan Timelords are they? so why would they change gender??
tingramretro
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by discodolly25:
“to be fair, James Bond & Miss Marple arent Gallifreyan Timelords are they? so why would they change gender??”

Why would a Time Lord?
lach doch mal
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“I'm a person who is very strong on equality in every sense, but if there's one thing I've learned from this thread, it's that gender bias seems to be a much more entrenched kind of bias than racism or homophobia or anything else. It will take much more to overcome it.”

I'm very strong on equality in every sense as well, but people stating on this thread that the doctor remains male does not equate to inequality. The doctor is a fictional character, who has so far been introduced as a male specimen of his species. We also know that the same species has female specimen (there has been no indication that male timelords can turn into females and female timeladies can turn into timelords). Now I don't think anyone in this thread has stated that female timeladies are less capable than the doctor, or that it would be a bad thing to have a female timelady (indeed Romana was an excellent example of someone who was intelligent and resourceful). At the moment, it seems to me as if you are just accussing people of gender inequality and mysogyny when they don't share your vision for Dr Who.

Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“It isn't displaying a bias to want the character to remain who he's always been. Would you expect James Bond to become female? No, because he's male. oR how about a male Miss Marple? I can't see it, myself.
...

It has already lasted almost fifty years without needing any such change, it can continue just as long again. The Doctor is the show. with a different character, it wouldn't be Doctor Who.”

Pretty much agree with your first paragraph and with the second. The doctor is the show, introducing a different character would somehow not make sense IMO obviously.
CustardCreamed
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by discodolly25:
“not that i would want Dr who to continue if the dr wasnt in it, but to jump on the Greys Anatomy bandwagon thing, one show thats been successful since its title character died (in 1994!) is Taggart.

the difference with shows like Taggart & GA is that they have multiple characters who can be part of a main story if the titled character isnt there (for whatever reason ie death of the main actor, actress going on maternity leave etc) but i'm sorry you cant have Dr Who without the Doctor, who only has one or two companions with him at one time (ok not including RTD's series finales )”

Well - it's just a suggestion for one way to continue the show after the Doctor's lives are up.
I think it's naive, wishful thinking from the ultra-conservatives and misogynists on here, to think that it will continue on indefinitely with a male Doctor. Ridiculous. If it stays, I will eventually get my female Doctor
But, - in general , enough about it now - I think it's a great idea, and I'm not alone in that opinion however it might seem on this thread.
I don't have all night every night to argue and defend my ideas.
The misogynists can take the last word if they like ( you know who you are ) , but
"The moral high ground
is MINE !"
crazzyaz7
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“
No - I stand by that statement. It does depend on the person

I don't think they were joking - no smilies or anything. But the feminists I know, - even if it was a joke they'd still have something to say about it , believe me ! ( And they'd be right ). ]”



By making that statement you therefore actually judging me too, as i too am not keen on a female Doctor...

Yeah sure we can all have something to say about it....and we all have our thresholds on what offends us and what doesn't....but we females are eqaully bad when it comes to making jokes about the males.....in todays' day and age...when it comes to making digs...we are equall

Quote:
“Yes we will have to disagree, but I think it's the very moment of regeneration which would make such a powerful statement about gender indifference/transcendence - The same person, in a different gender.”

I think you don't fully undersatnd what Gender indifference means...it means not caring about the gender...and surely by wanting a female Doctor is as bad or equal as not wanting a female Doctor...because you are askig the Doctor to be a specific gender....when I say I want the Doctor to remain Male, its because him being male is not an issue to me at all....it doesn't make a statement of sexism/misogyny...nothing more to it...he is just male, just like my dad is, and only because I want equall rights for women doesn't mean I want my dad to have a sex change....wanting him to be female would be me caring and wanting a gender difference not indifference....whenever the Doctor becames female, it will be as you say revolutionary...not something people will not bat an eyelid too, not something people will be indifferent to...because it would be too busy making a statement....would you have a sex change to prove that you are gender indifference? No, ofcourse not, you can do that in many other ways, like not caring about the sex of your child, not delving into stereotypical behaviours....yiu don't need a radical sex change for that...

Quote:
“I'm a person who is very strong on equality in every sense, but if there's one thing I've learned from this thread, it's that gender bias seems to be a much more entrenched kind of bias than racism or homophobia or anything else. It will take much more to overcome it.”


ofcourse subconsciously loads of people have their own predjudices....and I agtree, maybe there are some who are gender bias...I don't know, but it doesn't stand for someone like me who is aware that to be eqaul we don't need to actually get rid of men. The point of being Equall is standing side by side, being proud of who we are, what we are and respecting each other...and not trying to get above another to prove who is better....the fact that you are saying the role of the Doctor would prove gender indifferrence, you are making the male role into something more bigger than it is. He just happens to be male...nothing wrong with that at all.


Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“The Doctor as we currently know the entity, has 1 or 2 more incarnations left. If you have some ingenious plot device as to how to get around this, let's hear it.
For the show to continue for decades to come, with the same title, it would have to be a different Doctor, and I've explained, using the example of Grey's, since someone else brought it up again - how this could be possible. ( I hope it DOES continue, because I'm confident I'll be proven right about the female
Doctor ).”

But you see a simple explanation can be brought by anyone on why he has more than 13 lives....for example on the top of my non-fiction writer head, I can think of one good reason...the Time War, the Time Lords gave him, like the Master a thousand more regenerations. You see simple yet effective reason to why the character can remain forever and not be trapped on a limit that wasn't even there when the show first started....
capt.shoegazer
02-06-2010
Here you go Tingram- behold the splendour:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--RHy6UUdxk

Yep, this is definitely what Doctor Who needs to be more like. Cooler, more emotional and so much hotter baby!
capt.shoegazer
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“Well - it's just a suggestion for one way to continue the show after the Doctor's lives are up.
I think it's naive, wishful thinking from the ultra-conservatives and misogynists on here, to think that it will continue on indefinitely with a male Doctor. Ridiculous. If it stays, I will eventually get my female Doctor
But, - in general , enough about it now - I think it's a great idea, and I'm not alone in that opinion however it might seem on this thread.
I don't have all night every night to argue and defend my ideas.
The misogynists can take the last word if they like ( you know who you are ) , but "The moral high ground is MINE !"”

:yawn:
tingramretro
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by capt.shoegazer:
“Here you go Tingram- behold the splendour:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--RHy6UUdxk

Yep, this is definitely what Doctor Who needs to be more like. Cooler, more emotional and so much hotter baby! ”

Oh my God-don't ever do that to me again, Captain!
crazzyaz7
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“Well - it's just a suggestion for one way to continue the show after the Doctor's lives are up.
I think it's naive, wishful thinking from the ultra-conservatives and misogynists on here, to think that it will continue on indefinitely with a male Doctor. Ridiculous. If it stays, I will eventually get my female Doctor
But, - in general , enough about it now - I think it's a great idea, and I'm not alone in that opinion however it might seem on this thread.
I don't have all night every night to argue and defend my ideas.
The misogynists can take the last word if they like ( you know who you are ) , but
"The moral high ground
is MINE !"”

I'm not sure how it is niave and wishful thinking to think that the Doctor will remain male. considering that he has made it over 46 years in the role as a male....there is nothing really odd to think that he could stay male for another 46 years to come. Like i said there maybe a day that he is female....but its not a must...hasn't been in the past, is not in the present, and doesn't need to be in the future either...if it happens it happens....but there is no great call out for it....from males and females....most of us have no issue with him being male...
Listentome
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by CustardCreamed:
“The Doctor as we currently know the entity, has 1 or 2 more incarnations left. If you have some ingenious plot device as to how to get around this, let's hear it.
For the show to continue for decades to come, with the same title, it would have to be a different Doctor, and I've explained, using the example of Grey's, since someone else brought it up again - how this could be possible. ( I hope it DOES continue, because I'm confident I'll be proven right about the female
Doctor ).”

I'm sorry to say this but if you really think the 2 regenerations left (something that was mentioned in one line in a story years ago) is going to leave the programme makers with no choice but to continue the programme with a different lead character, then it seems to me you are not getting the programme.

If you think it is conceivable for the Doctor to change gender, then why can't you see that one simple line can explain why the 12 regenerations/13 incarnations rule no longer applies? It has been discussed dozens of times in this forum.

As people have pointed out The Master has died, but come back to life. In classic Who he extended his life beyond body 13.

The most popular idea for how the Doctor can continue past his 13th is that it was a rule imposed by the Time Lords. Now the Time Lords are gone, their rules have gone too. Thus the 13 limit no longer stands, A good writer can explain it in one line. Its sci-fi, so anything is possible.

Steven Moffat (who I would argue is an authority on how Doctor Who should be made) has said The Doctor is always the same man, there have not been 11 Doctors, there's been one Doctor with 11 different faces. The Doctor's past experiences are so integral to everything he does, he is the central core of the show. Its not enough to have a different character with the same name. And given it is sci-fi there is no need.

You seem to be using the 13 lives limit to support your opinion that not only could the Doctor become a woman, but also a different person. But it really doesn't support your view (which I do respect by the way) because the limit really can be resolved easily given the genre.

best
nebogipfel
02-06-2010
Originally Posted by crazzyaz7:
“I don't think wanting the Doctor not to be a female does show what kind of person your are...considering that I too don't, and I am quite a feminst...a lot of my life choices have revolved around making a stand against female stereotypes, the way I dress is because I feel it gives me freedom from from following the latest female trends (but will fight to the death for other females to do so)....I am not a big fan of gender specific roles....it does my families head in.....but despite that I still want the Doctor to be male, and me wanting him to remain male doesn't make me conservative all of a sudden

If, like I said that they end up going for a female, I won't hold it agaisnt them....but I won't be petitioning for a female Doctor any time soon....as the women in the Doctor's life are quite powerful anyway....thereis no need for a balance to be adressed....

The show does that anyway....the female companions do that role of showing gender indifference, the female baddies do that already....the fact that everyone who is good or bad, is not based on their gender, but on the person they are, they are definitely gender indifference, and speaking as someone who can't seem to switch her sociological/psychological brain off while watching anything....I'd be the first to shout out that they are not being fair to women, or degrading them....and I have never had a problem with Doctor Who...except for some small moments in Classic Who when some companions would become nothing more than Screamers....but I think that was the fault of the story for using them as spare fodders, and no time to give them depth....but in 46 years a little bit here and there isn't half bad....”

Well, this all seems fairly sensible to me. So yes, this.

You may or may not have a crazzy az, I wouldn't know, but head seems ok.
<<
<
6 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map