Originally Posted by fatskia:
“But take last year for instance. Lilia was voted out first go because it was impossible to make Richard any better than she did. Martina Hingis was voted off, so Matt was out first go too. Darren showed what he could do with Jill and Emma, but often he was limited by older partners. We missed out on the potential these great dancers have.”
Is the pattern of the demotion really that simple? That makes it sound like some know-nothing in their twenties with some meaningless qualification in a shiny suit is responsible for the changes in Strictly with no knowledge of its history. Lilia went out first but she has made the biggest single contribution to Strictly as outstanding dancer, teacher and choreographer. Darren and Matthew have also won the series.
If they want to remove somebody who made little contribution to the celebrities, remove Aliona.
If they want to remove someone without charm, remove Natalie.
If they want to remove someone who is too small, remove Vincent.
If they want to remove someone who is too big, remove Natalie.
If they want to remove someone who is too old, remove Ian - they did.
If they want to remove someone who is too variable, remove Anton.
If they want to remove someone who shows all the other women up, remove Ola.