Originally Posted by daveyboy7472:
“I'm really pleased Amy is back next series. I also get seriously fed up with the constant changes of either Doctor or companion between series. I know this happened a lot in Classic Who but I think the Doctor/Companion dynamic can work great given a few series together. Look at Pertwee/Manning and Baker/Sladen relationships. Both turned out to be great partnerships are a couple of series together. ”
I think it'll be great to be able to have more of the Doctor and Amy, That's something that hasn't happened in the new stuff. Even with Donna, Rose and Martha, there were family attachments that watered down the Doctor/Companion role and added extra characters to the mix. The current series seems fresher for that. Although i did like the companion families (Jackie being my favourite), i think the decision to make Amy an orphan has changed the show's atmosphere. Rory was a welcome addition,a nd I would have liked to have seem more of him (perhaps he will be back, in the finale???), but a straightforward, longrunning Doctor/Companion combo is very welcome.
Originally Posted by crazzyaz7:
“current companions have at least ten stories in a series, while the classic series the most it would be is 7 or 8, except for earlier Hartnell series's which sometimes consisted of 10....but even then, we would get changes of some sort at leats every series....for example you point out Pertwee and Manning, well we had some stories with another companion in the form of UNIT, and then we had stories which were away from that period....then we had a series with Pertwee and Sladen, before Tom came along, and for one whole series we also had Harry to that mix who left at the end of the Zygon story...with only Sladen for company for another 7 stories. With Leela in the next nine stories after a companion lite one...with Romana one staying for one series, and so on....”
I think it's not the number of
stories that make it different: it's the number of
episodes. In the olden days, DW was on telly for 26 weeks. 45 weeks, back in the B&W days (no wonder Bill Hartnell occasionally forgot his lines). That would mean that some companions did 40 or 50 episodes. That is what makes a companion longrunning.
Martha and Donna probably only did about 15 episodes each. Rose did 26 (?) plus all those endless bloody boring returns on top of that. Rose is a fairly longrunner by any standard, but adding Jackie and Mickey to the mix tended to dilute that.
Don't forget, Crazzy, Romana had K9 alongside her. She was not a standalone companion.
The Doctor with one companion only became
the norm from 1984. Sarah Jane travelled alone with the Doctor for a few stories, but her replacement (Leela) didn't get the chance to have the Doctor to herself for long before K9 came along. Before that, and after that, there were all kinds of combinations of companions: male and female; older and younger; human and (humanoid) alien. While it could be argued that Liz and Jo were standalone companions, that had all the UNIT stuff attached to them.
This idea of "Doctor + 1" does not really bear much scrutiny. It was only consistently applied from 1984 to 1987. The 21st century series hasn't really done it, as they have kept all kinds of other "hangers on" attached to the companions. Amy as a solo companion, without Rory, is not as "traditional" as you might think.
Originally Posted by agent_c:
“Bring back Janet Fielding, she'll soon sort them out.”
I second that emotion.