[darkjedimaster]

I was doing some research on the camera quality of the new Iphone 4 & came across an indepth review which makes it look really good. But then it is bound to be better quality than my 3GS lol.

http://www.macworld.com/article/1523...meratests.html

Despite the apparant signal issues when holding the phone tightly which I don't think that would happen to me as my 3GS is in a case with the rubber bumpers, so have gotten use to holding it a different way.

I may give Orange a call next week & see about bagging myself 1 .

[sensoria]

I took loads of photos with mine while camping at the weekend, when I downloaded them I was astonished at the quality. So I am really quite pleased now. Also left house at 10 in the morning on Saturday with a full charge went all through the night and when I got home at 4 it still had 20% battery and I had used it heavily.

[dreamfish]

Yeah I must admit, the camera is excellent - coupled with the amazing screen, it really stands out. I am also surprised how good the LED flash is. Much better than the 3G ever offered.

[BT@home]

suprised at the choice of handsets to test against ... none of them have ever been considered to be "good" cameraphones.

[clonmult]

Quote:

Originally Posted by BT@home

suprised at the choice of handsets to test against ... none of them have ever been considered to be "good" cameraphones.

Me too ... but then its a very US-centric test, and they've never tended to have much in the way of decent cameras on them.

I'd like to see a few decent comparisons against a range of phones - Nokias N82 would quite possibly whup the iPhone 4 in low light imaging, purely down to having a proper flash. Its quite probable that the iPhone 4 will better the N95/N82 overall though. Not bad going for a 4 year old design.

N86 - would be a very interesting comparison, as would the Satio.

But the one I'm waiting for is against the N8 - that could well be the imaging mobile of choice.