Super AMOLED vs. Retina

moox · 28-06-2010, 16:58

Quote:

You still have to 'hack' an Android in order to root it, so its not all that different.

My Desire is rooted, but purely only for apps2sd.

When HTC finally get a 2.2 ROM out for it, I will have no need to root. It does everything else I could want.

It's not like my iPod or an iPhone where you have to jailbreak for the slightest thing that Apple or the network doesn't want you to use.

I don't have an issue with Android's multitasking (but I am used to proper multitasking, since I've had Nokias for years), however I do have that nice 1GHz processor and 576MB RAM. Both exceed the iPhone 4, I believe.

jim_uk · 28-06-2010, 17:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by ohirome

My only experience of multitasking on a phone has been using android and it was a terrible experience. Saying that, I dont *need* all my programs to run in the background. Each to their own!

Which phone was that? I remember the Hero got a bit sluggish if too much was running but my Desire runs plenty without any issue.

mikey86uk · 28-06-2010, 18:27

Are people confused with the title?

This isnt an Android Vs Iphone OS topic people!

How many times are we going to have this discussion?

psionic · 28-06-2010, 18:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gormond

For me its the Retina Display because the brightness helps you read it in daylight and its twice as bright as the Super AMOLED.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zantarous

Yep tried mine in the sunlight yesterday and was pleasantly surprised that I could use the iPhone 4 outdoors.

I'm finding the iPhone 4 display nice and bright and crisp. However I've never personally tried AMOLED so I can't say which is better.

Gormond · 28-06-2010, 19:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by psionic

I'm finding the iPhone 4 display nice and bright and crisp. However I've never personally tried AMOLED so I can't say which is better.

The iPhone 4 screen is twice as bright which is a technical fact and has a higher resolution. However the AMOLED produces better colours and uses less power.

okuda · 28-06-2010, 19:34

Apart from all the iphone/android bashing that is going on here...! back to the point of the topic...! I keep reading how fantasic the iphone4 display is and the pixel density is so great the human eye can't see it..!!! Well i've got a HTC Desire and i'd be buggered if i can see the pixels on that..!! (must be getting old!) no serious i've got prefect vision.. All this rubbish about i've got more pixels than you is a waste of time... As for how good each one is in direct sunlight..!! yet again more rubbish, I can't see outta my car windscreen when the sun is shining straight in..!! hence why cars are fitted with sun-visors..!! so use ya hand or ya head to shield the phone from direct sunlight... problem solved...

Dan30 · 28-06-2010, 19:35

Think some people are confusing SUPER AMOLED for the old standard AMOLED, Samsungs new super amoled is much better and is more visable under sunlight than the amoled. There really isn't much between the super amoled and retina, Engadet have done a comparison of the 2 and it is very close. http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/i...-amoled-fight/

call100 · 29-06-2010, 19:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gormond

The iPhone 4 screen is twice as bright which is a technical fact and has a higher resolution. However the AMOLED produces better colours and uses less power.

Agreed, which is why I made my judgement based on an actual side by side comparison.....There isn't that much in it when you actually get to see them both perform....
Having said that, I doubt that the screen alone would sell a phone....

alanwarwic · 29-06-2010, 20:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan30

Think some people are confusing SUPER AMOLED for the old standard AMOLED, Samsungs new super amoled is much better and is more visable under sunlight than the amoled. There really isn't much between the super amoled and retina, Engadet have done a comparison of the 2 and it is very close. http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/i...-amoled-fight/

Super Amoled is revolutionary(if you have to use that word) whilst the 'retina' display is high quality old technology.
Quite weird how both phones use pretty much the same CPU and chipset.

clonmult · 29-06-2010, 20:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanwarwic

Super Amoled is revolutionary(if you have to use that word) whilst the 'retina' display is high quality old technology.
Quite weird how both phones use pretty much the same CPU and chipset.

Not that surprising really, 99% of mobiles are on an arm variant, and there aren't that many mobile GPU suppliers either.

Although the Broadcom video in the N8 is looking like being *very* interesting.

alanwarwic · 29-06-2010, 20:59

Yes ARM but both are the Coretex A8 with same GPU too.
Both of these are produced by Samsung with seemingly very minor differences.
It could be that Apple were slow developing so sweet/money talked Samsung into putting a sticky A4 label on theirs.
Apple do now have a license to use ARM designs but maybe are not yet the up to speed with the skillset needed.

clonmult · 29-06-2010, 22:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanwarwic

Yes ARM but both are the Coretex A8 with same GPU too.
Both of these are produced by Samsung with seemingly very minor differences.
It could be that Apple were slow developing so sweet/money talked Samsung into putting a sticky A4 label on theirs.
Apple do now have a license to use ARM designs but maybe are not yet the up to speed with the skillset needed.

Check out the N900 - same Cortex A8 and GPU.

Apple should be up to speed with ARM design, as they bought out Intrinsity who have been working on ARM for years.

Lol, when I bought that Archimedes A310 years back, did a CPU upgrade on it, I didn't quite expect that CPU architecture to take the world by storm

Dan30 · 30-06-2010, 08:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanwarwic

Yes ARM but both are the Coretex A8 with same GPU too.
Both of these are produced by Samsung with seemingly very minor differences.
It could be that Apple were slow developing so sweet/money talked Samsung into putting a sticky A4 label on theirs.
Apple do now have a license to use ARM designs but maybe are not yet the up to speed with the skillset needed.

Found this on the engadget website, interesting to see Jobs saying "designed by our own team"

http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/08/a...share-a-brain/

alanwarwic · 30-06-2010, 09:43

It would make sense for Apple to share the development with Samsung.
Especially in that there seems to be only minor differences between the old iphone Samsung SOC and the new iphone SOC.

A cheap article in the extreme though. In that most know they use the A8 CPU.
It is all the bit and bods on the SOC that define it.

I do wonder whether the complexity of making a faster, yet lower power, dual core version (like Tegra 2) is why we got 'just a big iPod'.
Being first has value, especially if you already hog all the media publicity.
The Archos 5 was first with the A8 by a long margin but hardly anyone wanted a mini tablet.

call100 · 30-06-2010, 13:48

It may have already been said, but, my understanding is that Apple were going to use the Super AMOLED but Samsung could not guarantee the numbers required.....

alanwarwic · 30-06-2010, 14:13

Could be right. Super AMOLED is very very new.

And maybe as important for Apple they supposedly cost near double. 4 times the cost of the old iPhone screen?
Unluckily for Samsung their Super AMOLED will no doubt have a 'Super AMOLED is crap' Californian Wave.

KAC · 30-06-2010, 21:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by call100

It may have already been said, but, my understanding is that Apple were going to use the Super AMOLED but Samsung could not guarantee the numbers required.....

Link?

Shot_gunN · 01-07-2010, 00:16

Super AMOLED is exclusive to Samsung for 18 months I believe.
Apple should have gone down the AMOLED route as this would have been the better option due to its energy saving results.

28-06-2010, 16:58	#26
moox Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 14,645	Quote: Originally Posted by ohirome You still have to 'hack' an Android in order to root it, so its not all that different. My Desire is rooted, but purely only for apps2sd. When HTC finally get a 2.2 ROM out for it, I will have no need to root. It does everything else I could want. It's not like my iPod or an iPhone where you have to jailbreak for the slightest thing that Apple or the network doesn't want you to use. I don't have an issue with Android's multitasking (but I am used to proper multitasking, since I've had Nokias for years), however I do have that nice 1GHz processor and 576MB RAM. Both exceed the iPhone 4, I believe.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

28-06-2010, 17:37	#27
jim_uk Forum Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Watford Posts: 12,961	Quote: Originally Posted by ohirome My only experience of multitasking on a phone has been using android and it was a terrible experience. Saying that, I dont need all my programs to run in the background. Each to their own! Which phone was that? I remember the Hero got a bit sluggish if too much was running but my Desire runs plenty without any issue.

28-06-2010, 18:27	#28
mikey86uk Forum Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: England Posts: 5,525	Are people confused with the title? This isnt an Android Vs Iphone OS topic people! How many times are we going to have this discussion?

28-06-2010, 18:37	#29
psionic Forum Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Crystal Palace TX Posts: 19,702	Quote: Originally Posted by Gormond For me its the Retina Display because the brightness helps you read it in daylight and its twice as bright as the Super AMOLED. Quote: Originally Posted by zantarous Yep tried mine in the sunlight yesterday and was pleasantly surprised that I could use the iPhone 4 outdoors. I'm finding the iPhone 4 display nice and bright and crisp. However I've never personally tried AMOLED so I can't say which is better.

28-06-2010, 19:33	#30
Gormond Forum Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Scotland Posts: 15,714	Quote: Originally Posted by psionic I'm finding the iPhone 4 display nice and bright and crisp. However I've never personally tried AMOLED so I can't say which is better. The iPhone 4 screen is twice as bright which is a technical fact and has a higher resolution. However the AMOLED produces better colours and uses less power.

28-06-2010, 19:34	#31
okuda Forum Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Essex Posts: 307	Apart from all the iphone/android bashing that is going on here...! back to the point of the topic...! I keep reading how fantasic the iphone4 display is and the pixel density is so great the human eye can't see it..!!! Well i've got a HTC Desire and i'd be buggered if i can see the pixels on that..!! (must be getting old!) no serious i've got prefect vision.. All this rubbish about i've got more pixels than you is a waste of time... As for how good each one is in direct sunlight..!! yet again more rubbish, I can't see outta my car windscreen when the sun is shining straight in..!! hence why cars are fitted with sun-visors..!! so use ya hand or ya head to shield the phone from direct sunlight... problem solved...

28-06-2010, 19:35	#32
Dan30 Forum Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 163	Think some people are confusing SUPER AMOLED for the old standard AMOLED, Samsungs new super amoled is much better and is more visable under sunlight than the amoled. There really isn't much between the super amoled and retina, Engadet have done a comparison of the 2 and it is very close. http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/i...-amoled-fight/

29-06-2010, 19:52	#33
call100 Forum Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 6,572	Quote: Originally Posted by Gormond The iPhone 4 screen is twice as bright which is a technical fact and has a higher resolution. However the AMOLED produces better colours and uses less power. Agreed, which is why I made my judgement based on an actual side by side comparison.....There isn't that much in it when you actually get to see them both perform.... Having said that, I doubt that the screen alone would sell a phone....

29-06-2010, 20:15	#34
alanwarwic Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: the wild world web Posts: 28,132	Quote: Originally Posted by Dan30 Think some people are confusing SUPER AMOLED for the old standard AMOLED, Samsungs new super amoled is much better and is more visable under sunlight than the amoled. There really isn't much between the super amoled and retina, Engadet have done a comparison of the 2 and it is very close. http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/i...-amoled-fight/ Super Amoled is revolutionary(if you have to use that word) whilst the 'retina' display is high quality old technology. Quite weird how both phones use pretty much the same CPU and chipset.

29-06-2010, 20:45	#35
clonmult Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: UK Posts: 3,291	Quote: Originally Posted by alanwarwic Super Amoled is revolutionary(if you have to use that word) whilst the 'retina' display is high quality old technology. Quite weird how both phones use pretty much the same CPU and chipset. Not that surprising really, 99% of mobiles are on an arm variant, and there aren't that many mobile GPU suppliers either. Although the Broadcom video in the N8 is looking like being very interesting.

29-06-2010, 20:59	#36
alanwarwic Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: the wild world web Posts: 28,132	Yes ARM but both are the Coretex A8 with same GPU too. Both of these are produced by Samsung with seemingly very minor differences. It could be that Apple were slow developing so sweet/money talked Samsung into putting a sticky A4 label on theirs. Apple do now have a license to use ARM designs but maybe are not yet the up to speed with the skillset needed.

29-06-2010, 22:35	#37
clonmult Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: UK Posts: 3,291	Quote: Originally Posted by alanwarwic Yes ARM but both are the Coretex A8 with same GPU too. Both of these are produced by Samsung with seemingly very minor differences. It could be that Apple were slow developing so sweet/money talked Samsung into putting a sticky A4 label on theirs. Apple do now have a license to use ARM designs but maybe are not yet the up to speed with the skillset needed. Check out the N900 - same Cortex A8 and GPU. Apple should be up to speed with ARM design, as they bought out Intrinsity who have been working on ARM for years. Lol, when I bought that Archimedes A310 years back, did a CPU upgrade on it, I didn't quite expect that CPU architecture to take the world by storm

30-06-2010, 08:25	#38
Dan30 Forum Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 163	Quote: Originally Posted by alanwarwic Yes ARM but both are the Coretex A8 with same GPU too. Both of these are produced by Samsung with seemingly very minor differences. It could be that Apple were slow developing so sweet/money talked Samsung into putting a sticky A4 label on theirs. Apple do now have a license to use ARM designs but maybe are not yet the up to speed with the skillset needed. Found this on the engadget website, interesting to see Jobs saying "designed by our own team" http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/08/a...share-a-brain/

30-06-2010, 09:43	#39
alanwarwic Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: the wild world web Posts: 28,132	It would make sense for Apple to share the development with Samsung. Especially in that there seems to be only minor differences between the old iphone Samsung SOC and the new iphone SOC. A cheap article in the extreme though. In that most know they use the A8 CPU. It is all the bit and bods on the SOC that define it. I do wonder whether the complexity of making a faster, yet lower power, dual core version (like Tegra 2) is why we got 'just a big iPod'. Being first has value, especially if you already hog all the media publicity. The Archos 5 was first with the A8 by a long margin but hardly anyone wanted a mini tablet.

30-06-2010, 13:48	#40
call100 Forum Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 6,572	It may have already been said, but, my understanding is that Apple were going to use the Super AMOLED but Samsung could not guarantee the numbers required.....

30-06-2010, 14:13	#41
alanwarwic Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: the wild world web Posts: 28,132	Could be right. Super AMOLED is very very new. And maybe as important for Apple they supposedly cost near double. 4 times the cost of the old iPhone screen? Unluckily for Samsung their Super AMOLED will no doubt have a 'Super AMOLED is crap' Californian Wave.

30-06-2010, 21:34	#42
KAC Forum Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: London Posts: 485	Quote: Originally Posted by call100 It may have already been said, but, my understanding is that Apple were going to use the Super AMOLED but Samsung could not guarantee the numbers required..... Link?

01-07-2010, 00:16	#43
Shot_gunN Forum Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Merseyside Posts: 583	Super AMOLED is exclusive to Samsung for 18 months I believe. Apple should have gone down the AMOLED route as this would have been the better option due to its energy saving results.

DS Forums

Super AMOLED vs. Retina