Originally Posted by Desert Rat:
“A lot of positive comments about GMTV now with the current state its in. Of course it could just be that its the FB fans (who 'likes' something they don't like?) so obviously they're going to feel that way, but in some ways its more an accurate representation than any focus group they may have held. The only way we will truly know how it is going down amongst the current audience is looking at the Daybreak audience and seeing the differences in demographics.
I do think ITV have been a bit hasty, they could have made all of these changes but kept the GMTV name (lets face it, if Kate and most of the other reporters/minor presenters are staying then theres no point in bothering changing it anyway) and it would have a fighting chance of not alienating as many people. It could also be worth having 2 sets of presenters e.g. Adrian & Christine Monday-Wednesday and Kate & John Thursday-Friday just for a bit of stability. Then again, Adrian throws fits when he doesn't get to work a 5 day week. But for every argument to keep it, theres an argument to get rid of it. Its a very hard one to call.
On the flip side- its the weakest of the three main ITV daytime shows on FB and only has about 10,000 fans compared to almost 50,000 for This Morning and nearly 60,000 for Loose Women.
ITV should scrap Dickinson's Real Deal, if not at the very least in the North East.”
To be honest i think the people that can be bothered to comment on the facebook page are the ones that dont like it! Most ordinary folk aren't going to think "I like that name , let me go on Facebook" and say so.
And there did need to get red of teh GMTV name tbh - it's assosiated with the Phone in scandal's etc and it GMTV has already been relaunched last January and that obviuoulsy didn't work as the viewing figures have stayed the same really at the most. So completey changing the name is what is needed!