|
||||||||
The Ratings Thread (Part 10) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1201 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 37,641
|
Quote:
Well of course we can but you know it goes much further than just talking about ratings as open_ended said. A few days there were quite a lot of posts about X Factor scheduling and it was tedious. The show doesnt start for 6 weeks and still wont have finished in 5 months time!
I have no real interest in the world cup apart from the England games - but I don't complain when that's dominating discussion, I just didn't read or post. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1202 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
But most discussion on here veers away from specifically ratings on a regular basis. I don't see how people can start objecting as soon as the topic turns to a show they don't like.
I have no real interest in the world cup apart from the England games - but I don't complain when that's dominating discussion, I just didn't read or post. |
|
|
|
|
#1203 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Personally I think ITV will enjoy an improved performance compared to last for this year's World Cup final.
Apart from the missed England goal on HD, which was obviously a huge mistake at the time, they have actually had quite a good World Cup to be honest. Arguably Chiles has helped bring some real credibility to ITV's football coverage and I'd be surprised not to see this reflected in the ratings tomorrow night, at least to some degree, even if it's only a smidgen higher. As bad as it was, the HD malfunction only affected around 1 million out of an audience roughly eighteen times that size. The type of person who went out of their way to watch it in HD are never going to choose ITV's coverage over the BBC anyway so I don't expect that to have an impact on ratings. |
|
|
|
|
#1204 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Glasgow,Scotland
Posts: 3,666
|
Quote:
Personally I think ITV will enjoy an improved performance compared to last for this year's World Cup final.
Apart from the missed England goal on HD, which was obviously a huge mistake at the time, they have actually had quite a good World Cup to be honest. Arguably Chiles has helped bring some real credibility to ITV's football coverage and I'd be surprised not to see this reflected in the ratings tomorrow night, at least to some degree, even if it's only a smidgen higher. As bad as it was, the HD malfunction only affected around 1 million out of an audience roughly eighteen times that size. The type of person who went out of their way to watch it in HD are never going to choose ITV's coverage over the BBC anyway so I don't expect that to have an impact on ratings. |
|
|
|
|
#1205 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,067
|
The ratio will be sizeable. Surely when given the choice of watching something with adverts or without, everyone would choose without?
Even if only a few million watch ITV's coverage, it is still a few million football viewers and all the advertisers that that brings to the channel, rather than Midsomer Murders viewers that are targeted every week. |
|
|
|
|
#1206 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,647
|
Quote:
The ratio will be sizeable. Surely when given the choice of watching something with adverts or without, everyone would choose without?
|
|
|
|
|
#1207 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,853
|
Oh, I guess no ratings yet
|
|
|
|
|
#1208 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
Quote:
Oh, I guess no ratings yet
![]() Don't forget BTW, on Sunday to get a total rating we'll have to add their HD conterparts - which I bet will be a new record. |
|
|
|
|
#1209 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
The ratio will be sizeable. Surely when given the choice of watching something with adverts or without, everyone would choose without?
Just to be clear though I will still be watching on the BBC tomorrow night. I haven't gone completely insane, don't worry.
|
|
|
|
|
#1210 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
First glimpse of yesterday's ratings, and Raoul Moat coverage peaked at over 1m on BBC News and Sky News: Quote:
LiamHamiltonDCD: Sky & BBC News channels provide 9 of 10 most watched digital programmes of Friday, all from 8.30pm onwards as Raoul Moat hunt goes 'live'. - 2 minutes ago via web
OK, it doesn't explicitly say that, but you'd have to assume that some parts peaked quite a bit over 1m based on the 9/10 statement.EDIT: Not quite it seems: Quote:
LiamHamiltonDCD: Sky News is top digital channel Friday, 2.6% all-time share, marginally ahead of BBC News. Sky News at 10 biggest individual audience, 900k - 2 minutes ago via web
It makes me wonder why people went to Sky News instead of BBC News. I guess their coverage was better, but considering how comprehensively BBC News beat Sky in the Election, I find that... surprising?EDIT 2: Actually, I guess combined would send it over 1m on reflection. |
|
|
|
|
#1211 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,742
|
Quote:
It makes me wonder why people went to Sky News instead of BBC News. I guess their coverage was better, but considering how comprehensively BBC News beat Sky in the Election, I find that... surprising?
|
|
|
|
|
#1212 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 837
|
Quote:
Because it is a completely different type of person watching last night versus the Election night. Last night was infotainment not hard news.
|
|
|
|
|
#1213 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,647
|
Sky News seems more popular the further north you go. Put 2 and 2 together, and well you can see why Sky was slightly ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
#1214 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,853
|
Quote:
Sky News seems more popular the further north you go. Put 2 and 2 together, and well you can see why Sky was slightly ahead.
Im sure most peoples first instict was to go to Sky News instead of BBC News looks like. Also Kay Burley is quite a contreversial newsreader, maybe people were looking out if she was doing any of the story. |
|
|
|
|
#1215 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,294
|
The whole thing was like a bizarre entertainment show. The BBC was very good until Jon Sopel clocked off and then they treated like just another news story. Sky on the other hand was very entertaining all night. Quotes like" Weve got OUR man" and "Its a standoff, its dramatic and its live on Sky" summed up Sky's mentality towards the event.
|
|
|
|
|
#1216 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
Quote:
Because it is a completely different type of person watching last night versus the Election night. Last night was infotainment not hard news.
Also, you say that, but on the day of the Cumbria shootings, BBC beat Sky News looking on BARB. Quote:
Sky News seems more popular the further north you go. Put 2 and 2 together, and well you can see why Sky was slightly ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
#1217 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,742
|
Quote:
I'm not saying it isn't, but just that BBC News tends to be ahead in 'big' events.
Also, you say that, but on the day of the Cumbria shootings, BBC beat Sky News looking on BARB. Guess this would be a more plausible explanation. |
|
|
|
|
#1218 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
Sky beat the BBC for Jades funeral and on Michael Jacksons death. Nutter shooting himself isnt that big an event really. I doubt anybody will remember him in 1 years time.
Was anyone else watching the BBC NEWS channel at around 2ish this morning (Just after the ending of the stand off)? The woman presenting was persistent that the bad turn in weather was a crucial in the ending of the stand off, and then she pestered anyone she spoke to, asking if they thought she was right... |
|
|
|
|
#1219 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
BBC News is always top for the run of the mill day to day stuff, so 95% of the time. For breaking news & quickly developing stories however viewers often flock to Sky News first. So I'm not surprised by last night's ratings.
Also the peak for Sky News came for Sky News at Ten, i.e. when the BBC News channel joined BBC One's bulletin and rolling coverage temporarily halted. |
|
|
|
|
#1220 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,647
|
What is the average age of a Sky News viewer in comparison to a BBC News viewer? That could also impact why Sky News sometimes goes ahead of the BBC for certain news events.
|
|
|
|
|
#1221 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,469
|
Quote:
I agree - different topics dominate the forum at different times. Even though there's a Soap Ratings Thread we've had EastEnders especially dominate the thread - even on a day when it's not aired - and then comparisons to Coronation Street, how characters coming in and out will affect the show etc. etc. etc. Not saying it's wrong, but certain shows dominate the thread and that's just the way it is.
|
|
|
|
|
#1222 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,670
|
Also remember that Sky has HD news and the BBC does not.
That will make it no contest in most HD homes. The difference in PQ from the crime scene was considerable. |
|
|
|
|
#1223 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
Also remember that Sky has HD news and the BBC does not.
That will make it no contest in most HD homes. The difference in PQ from the crime scene was considerable. Do those fidures include Sky News HD, or just the SD version? |
|
|
|
|
#1224 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,067
|
101 Ways is having a universally negative reaction elsewhere on the forum.
I expect after the initial viewing this week, only 101 viewers will tune in next week. |
|
|
|
|
#1225 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,948
|
Another BBC light entertainment disaster currently unfolding on BBC1.
101 Ways To Leave A Game Show is the slowest television programme ever and it's got ratings disaster writing all over it. It looked bad from the trailer but I never imagined it would be this bad. ![]()
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27.




