Will the housemate that is asked to leave be replaced I wonder. Like Nick was in the first BB. If they confirmed that the person leaving will leave like Nick did (via the back door), and will have their spot taken by someone else, then I'm sure things will kick off.
Will there be a replacement?
1 of 2
Like was said in the other thread, i think they'll pretend theyre kicking someone else out on fri but really its part of the whole thing theyve been planning all along to get 2 people to go in the secret room
its quite genius really
its quite genius really
Originally Posted by Emma Wroids:
“Yeah, but in the eyes of the viewers no one really is getting punished.”
“Yeah, but in the eyes of the viewers no one really is getting punished.”
Exactly and if BB want to be taken seriously buy the public and the housemates they have to evict someone as punishment not just pretend to and then put them back .
I think they should bring in another HM, (poor 13th HM!)
They are meant to be doing an unschelduled eviction, so that leaves a place free?
They are meant to be doing an unschelduled eviction, so that leaves a place free?
Originally Posted by sharonB:
“Exactly and if BB want to be taken seriously buy the public and the housemates they have to evict someone as punishment not just pretend to and then put them back .”
“Exactly and if BB want to be taken seriously buy the public and the housemates they have to evict someone as punishment not just pretend to and then put them back .”
I sooo agree with that, this is a punishment. NO 2nd chance.
I say, use this as an excuse to get Shell or Vanessa out (I can't see either doing much), bring in a new girl to clash with the others, and then still do the double/fake eviction.
It's important for a lot to happen in the first week.
It's important for a lot to happen in the first week.
Originally Posted by Emma Wroids:
“I say, use this as an excuse to get Shell or Vanessa out (I can't see either doing much), bring in a new girl to clash with the others, and then still do the double/fake eviction.
It's important for a lot to happen in the first week.”
“I say, use this as an excuse to get Shell or Vanessa out (I can't see either doing much), bring in a new girl to clash with the others, and then still do the double/fake eviction.
It's important for a lot to happen in the first week.”
To which the guys say, "No, get rid of Stuart, and replace him with a cute girl!"
Quoted from the Official Press Release, found here, page 12
http://www.hugsville.co.uk/bigbrother/news/61306.doc
Voluntary/ Involuntary Departure
If a housemate wants to leave they must first report to the Diary Room and give their reasons for leaving.
Big Brother may ask a housemate to leave the house if they behave inappropriately, for example, if they engage in violent or abusive behaviour, or damage the house or its contents.
Housemates leaving voluntarily or being asked to leave may be replaced at Big Brother’s discretion.
http://www.hugsville.co.uk/bigbrother/news/61306.doc
Voluntary/ Involuntary Departure
If a housemate wants to leave they must first report to the Diary Room and give their reasons for leaving.
Big Brother may ask a housemate to leave the house if they behave inappropriately, for example, if they engage in violent or abusive behaviour, or damage the house or its contents.
Housemates leaving voluntarily or being asked to leave may be replaced at Big Brother’s discretion.
It would be pointless to pretend you're taking one person out, only for them to rejoin the group the next week.
true emma-weve known all along about this but then again they didnt care last year when cameron was being shown in a pro-lite the whole series did they?
Originally Posted by sharonB:
“Exactly and if BB want to be taken seriously buy the public and the housemates they have to evict someone as punishment not just pretend to and then put them back .”
“Exactly and if BB want to be taken seriously buy the public and the housemates they have to evict someone as punishment not just pretend to and then put them back .”
there's obviously some angle we're missing on the putting back bit.
Originally Posted by hwirtz:
“To which the guys say, "No, get rid of Stuart, and replace him with a cute girl!"”
“To which the guys say, "No, get rid of Stuart, and replace him with a cute girl!"”
sorry, that is so funny, and I cant even tell you why! Just take my word for it.....and it's nothing against your post, honest!
Originally Posted by Emma Wroids:
“You can't get rid of Stuart. He's gorgeous.
”
“You can't get rid of Stuart. He's gorgeous.
”
And I'd say the same about Vanessa and Shell. I say ditch Michelle, if it's gotta be a girl.
On the upside for you, that'll get her paws off of Stuart for you!
Keep Nadia so she can hook up wif Da Slick.
They won't get rid of slapper Michelle... She's their only hope for sex this year. Well, straight sex anyway.
Originally Posted by hwirtz:
“And I'd say the same about Vanessa and Shell. I say ditch Michelle, if it's gotta be a girl.
On the upside for you, that'll get her paws off of Stuart for you!
Keep Nadia so she can hook up wif Da Slick.”
“And I'd say the same about Vanessa and Shell. I say ditch Michelle, if it's gotta be a girl.
On the upside for you, that'll get her paws off of Stuart for you!
Keep Nadia so she can hook up wif Da Slick.”
Nadia and Victor together would be THE moment of the series!!!
OK, keep Michelle and put in Fed as the replacement. See what he has to say about Geordie girls to one's face!
Nadia and Victor getting it on would be the funniest moment ever televised. Especially if Victor came in the diary room afterwards to announce "Yo, I nailed that bitch huh!"
I think they should evict Kitten and get someone to replace her. if they put her in the secret room she would probably bang on the walls n reaveal all to the others.
Originally Posted by browolf:
“there's obviously some angle we're missing on the putting back bit.”
“there's obviously some angle we're missing on the putting back bit.”
The series is a week longer. Having a first week with no real eviction may flow from that or you end up with too few HM. Once the secret room is no secret you can't have another false eviction. Question is why do it so early?
I think they will evict Kitten properly, but also "evict" another housemate to the secret bedsit, where they will be joined by Kitten's replacement.
However, as BB went to such lengths to keep the "evil" theme secret from the housemates, unless a group of replacements have been on standby they would be better off not sending anyone in. Possible they could leave it a few weeks to give Big Brother a mid-series boost.
However, as BB went to such lengths to keep the "evil" theme secret from the housemates, unless a group of replacements have been on standby they would be better off not sending anyone in. Possible they could leave it a few weeks to give Big Brother a mid-series boost.
Originally Posted by Brekkie Boy:
“However, as BB went to such lengths to keep the "evil" theme secret from the housemates, unless a group of replacements have been on standby they would be better off not sending anyone in. Possible they could leave it a few weeks to give Big Brother a mid-series boost.”
“However, as BB went to such lengths to keep the "evil" theme secret from the housemates, unless a group of replacements have been on standby they would be better off not sending anyone in. Possible they could leave it a few weeks to give Big Brother a mid-series boost.”
Don't they ALWAYS have standbys?
Originally Posted by TheDiaryRoom:
“Don't they ALWAYS have standbys?”
“Don't they ALWAYS have standbys?”
Josh (BB2) was kept in Portugal for the lead up to the show, before he was brought in. I'm sure Tim mentioned being isolated too. Maybe I'm wrong?
Come to think of it, every BB has had an extra housemate entering after the beginning - Claire, Josh, Tim, Lisa (& Gaetano). No reason for this year to be any different.
1 of 2
