Originally Posted by DVDfever:
“Ah, I didn't realise that was hers. I saw a few mins of Fish Tank on BBC HD a while back and turned it off, it was so dull. However, it does confirm that WH will be 4:3. She is clearly a very odd woman.”
'Odd', perhaps, in the sense that few people will see such films, yet they tend to be the ones covered most on movie sites and film magazines (buried beneath the Hollywood mainstream stuff, natch). There's a place for such films, but I can't see the point of something so screamingly dull. There again, I'm not the target audience (I'm in the auditorium next door, where there's a revival double-bill of ZOMBIE FLESH-EATERS and SWEDISH EROTIC SEXATIONS!).
As for the Academy (1.37:1) ratio, I think I would have preferred the retention of this in the early 1950's, rather than the introduction of cropped 1.85:1, since the difference between 1.37 and 2.35/9 is incredibly vast, and REALLY makes a visual difference, whereas there isn't that much of a difference between 1.85 and scope, especially nowadays with an overabundance of closeups and quick cuts which work against the scope frame. Japanese and Russian filmmakers continued using 1.37 well into the 1970's, alongside scope films, and they were no more or less visually inventive than their 1.85 counterparts.
By the way, one last point about Lionsgate's DVD version of THR3E: Not only is the image cropped, but the Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack heard in cinemas has been downmixed to 2-channel stereo. Talk about throwing away a DVD release!!