Yes, if they just genuinly evict one tonight, then as far as the hm's are concerned, someone was going to be evicted anyway. therefore the idea of kicking someone out for rule breaking has no substance at all, as far as the Hm's are concerned.

I agree, BB should have kept the original plan(two for the secret room), and genuinly evicted the one for rule breaking in a day or so.

bblb dernut confirmed an eviction tonight
yidaho are u going ! please report back

All this is really annoying me. I do not see what benefit there is from keeping kitten in. She has no moral integrity and has no conscience or guilt. The HMs may turn against her, but they aren;t that thrilled with her anyway so what is the point?

She broke the rules, she should go. It is OK for BB to get evil - but that should be with the HMs not with the public who deserve a fair gaime and as such we should be the only ones who decide who gets eviceted (other than those breaking the rules who should go).

There's not much point getting stories going or favourites emerging if you kick people out. You either evict a favourite or decide someone shouldn't be there which is the public's job. Picking completely undermines the show. Random selection just risks killing the key people. Remember people put money down on their favourites and will rightly scream fix.

You can evict Kitten for rule breaking but only if she is too dangerous as its your best story after people get bored with Michelle teaching Stuart tricks..

You could evict a plant - but its a waste. so early - unless you have lots.

You could do something with a twin if the stories about a twin are true. Who might have a twin? Can you see two Marcos oe Emmas? Shells or Daniels perhaps?

You could evict and then set a task that required another sacrifice to get the person back - that works and it means the HM made the choice and Kitten gets the blame for whatever it costs? Does that work?

[quote=thenetworkbabe]There's not much point getting stories going or favourites emerging if you kick people out. You either evict a favourite or decide someone shouldn't be there which is the public's job. Picking completely undermines the show. Random selection just risks killing the key people. Remember people put money down on their favourites and will rightly scream fix.

An excellent point.

I'm all for screaming fix....but you place bets at your own risk...betting is entirely independant of Endomol and is one thing I could never try to blame them for (although I might try if I could fond a link)....If their had been a phone vote then maybe I'd be ticked off if someone I'd spent money trying to keep in get kicked...but isn't voting on a week by week basis...And let's not forget Tickle got kicked by coming second in a vote...for a one off event...the suggestion that that was a little below the belt was soon washed over.....

Betting doesn't come into it, a hm can walk at anytime.

By throwing one out without a phone vote, they could possibly return at a later date and rejoin the game.

How can anyone POSSIBLY say Shell doesn't evoke feeling either way, when she's currently residing in 2nd place (by only 2 votes below 1st place) in the Most Popular Housemate poll on this site??????