Am I totally missing something?

The way I see it, Kitten got three warnings and now BB is going to evict someone from the house. She said in the dairy room that she thought BB was very clever for introducing this new rule, as it puts pressure on her to conform to avoid other people being evicted. BB obviously thought she may be happy to put her own neck on the line, but not others (does this mean BB has no inention of 'rewarding' her with her own eviction).

If it does .... and she doesn't get kicked out, does this mean that BB will reset the counter, and she if gets three more warnings, someone else will go (i.e. not her).

If she keeps this up, she will be the only one left!!!

I don't think BB are THAT stupid.

perhaps if BB was about the strict applicaiton of rules.

However the bottom line is that Kitten has brought publicity (and ratings) and they aren't ready to get rid of her yet - there is plenty of cannon fodder so they are going to keep Kitten in a little longer.

We all know how much they like the "bad girl made good" story so if Kitten sorts herself your you never know. However given she could start a fight in an empty room I suspect they will bin her when they have had their millage

Yes, because BB would just sit idly by thinking "damn, she's totally got us, there's nothing that we can do!"

When BB have the power to change the rules when they see fit, you can't win by abusing the rules.

I think BB trapped themselves by giving those 3 strikes to Kitten. Now they HAVE to chuck her out or she will have even less respect and become more of a nuisance than she already is.

That's what I was getting at - my original post was partially tongue in cheek (I know BB can do what he/she damn well pleases) but I didn't get my sarcasm across very well - sorry.

Will try harder...

I think they should disqualify her from the chance of winning the prize money because of the 3 strikes... not tell her and leave her in the house!